Load Delta Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single MSI GTX 770 Lightning configuration with a wall meter connected to the OCZ 1250W power supply. This power supply is Gold rated, and as I am in the UK on a 230-240 V supply, leads to ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare both the power management of the BIOS and the board's ability to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency.

Power Delta (Long Idle to OCCT)

Each of the Broadwell-E SKUs are rated at 140W, however they vary between 6 cores and 10 cores and with different frequencies.  Normally one would assume that the core/frequency ratio would be adjusted to match TDP, but ultimately using more cores can consume more power. We see a distinct increase in power consumption moving up the product stack.

Prime95 Core Loading

For this review, we also looked into peak delta power draw when varying the number of cores using Prime95’s mode for peak power consumption. Prime95 identifies cores with multiple threads and adjusts its loading/pinning accordingly.

Prime95 Core Loading

Broadwell-E Overclocking

Methodology

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows. We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads. These stability tests aim to catch any immediate issues with memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, we start off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed. The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocols) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+). Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.

Overclock Results

Due to time constraints we were only able to overclock the i7-6950X using the MSI X99A Gaming Carbon motherboard. MSI has improved its overclocking options as of late on the Z170 platform to make it easier to use, but our BIOS did not have those most recent updates, particularly for load line calibration. However, our sample hit 4.1 GHz at 1.30 volts before the OCCT load temperatures were prohibitive to move up any further. We saw similar things when testing the mainstream Broadwell parts with Iris Pro, which shows that this sort of overclocking performance might be indicative of the silicon itself.

That being said, speaking with our contacts at various motherboard manufacturers, we're told that 4.1 GHz is a reasonably average processor result for Broadwell-E. Some processors will hit 4.3 GHz on air at around the same voltage, whereas others need up to 1.4 volts, and thus results will depend on the cooling setup used or the thermal characteristics of the silicon. I have also been told that AVX is a different story: for any peak frequency attained normally, AVX overclock stable frequencies will be around 200-300 MHz lower.

Gaming, Cont: GRID: Autosport & Shadow of Mordor Catching Up: How Intel Can Re-Align Consumer and HEDT
Comments Locked

205 Comments

View All Comments

  • hoohoo - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Single thread performance lower than previous generation, but more cores. Sadly the price is totally out of line.

    I want to upgrade from an i7-3820, these things do offer the bang but the buck is definitely missing.
  • hoohoo - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Shouldn't they be using their GTX 1080? The games do not seem to be CPU bound. Am I reading the charts wrong?
  • pavag - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    "For $1721, [...] can invest in either the 14-core E5-2680 v4 [...] or get double the cores in a 2P system and using the E5-2640 v4 processor: a 10-core 2.4 GHz/3.4 "

    Ok. You said it, you own it.

    Do the benchmarks and compare. I actually need it.
  • Seekmore - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Intel I7 6950x-Like it already? It is overpriced and is the most expensive in the history of processors till the date. An excellent Processor with excellent performance calculated for its price and features it supports. One of the fastest processor ranking high in the category.
    http://www.comparecpus.com/en/intel-i7-5960x-vs-am...
    Get other details of Intel I7 6950x Extreme Edition to find out why is everybody looking for it..
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    I saw the prices and threw up a little in my mouth. This is market capitalism at its nadir :(
  • Spunjji - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    ...specifically with respect to the tech industry, obviously - didn't to be that hyperbolic.
  • stimudent - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    I just need to do my banking and watch porn. 56 cores should do the trick.
  • Gothmoth - Thursday, June 2, 2016 - link

    multitasking is the word.

    i use lightroom, photoshop, autopano giga at the same time very often.. every core helps.
    or i render out a video with premiere while i edit a composition in after effects.
  • iGigaflop - Thursday, June 2, 2016 - link

    I'll keep my 5820k i was kicking myself for not waiting 2 months for the 6800k but broadwell might be a little faster per clock but it doesnt overclock as good as haswell. I run my 5820k at 4.7 at 1.313 volts i think mine in a great overclocker and it never goes above mid 70c. But for everyday use i keep it at 4.2 and it stays around 50c. Im using a h100v2 and a cm storm stryker case. I think pretty much every 5820k should go 4.3-4.5ghz. And im running it off a asus x99 deluxe board. I just hope they keep the x99 v3 socket for skylake e.
  • Jackie60 - Friday, June 3, 2016 - link

    Why do you bother with the pointless GPU limited benchmarks-it's a total waste of time and effort and tell us nothing.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now