GRID: Autosport

No graphics tests are complete without some input from Codemasters and the EGO engine, which means for this round of testing we point towards GRID: Autosport, the next iteration in the GRID and racing genre. As with our previous racing testing, each update to the engine aims to add in effects, reflections, detail and realism, with Codemasters making ‘authenticity’ a main focal point for this version.

GRID’s benchmark mode is very flexible, and as a result we created a test race using a shortened version of the Red Bull Ring with twelve cars doing two laps. The car is focus starts last and is quite fast, but usually finishes second or third. For low end graphics we test at 1080p medium settings, whereas mid and high end graphics get the full 1080p maximum. Both the average and minimum frame rates are recorded.

GRID: Autosport on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560) 

GRID: Autosport on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Middle-Earth: Shadow of Mordor

The final title in our testing is another battle of system performance with the open world action-adventure title, Shadow of Mordor. Produced by Monolith using the LithTech Jupiter EX engine and numerous detail add-ons, SoM goes for detail and complexity to a large extent, despite having to be cut down from the original plans. The main story itself was written by the same writer as Red Dead Redemption, and it received Zero Punctuation’s Game of The Year in 2014.

For testing purposes, SoM gives a dynamic screen resolution setting, allowing us to render at high resolutions that are then scaled down to the monitor. As a result, we get several tests using the in-game benchmark. For low end graphics we examine at 720p with low settings, whereas mid and high end graphics get 1080p Ultra. The top graphics test is also redone at 3840x2160, also with Ultra settings, and we also test two cards at 4K where possible.

Shadow of Mordor on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

Shadow of Mordor on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Shadow of Mordor on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Gaming Performance: Alien Isolation, Total War Attila, & GTA V Power Consumption and i7-6950X Overclocking
Comments Locked

205 Comments

View All Comments

  • jwcalla - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    No time for a 1070 review but a dozen-page day-one review for a platform nobody is going to buy.
  • rhysiam - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Different authors. It's Ryan Smith who tackles the GPU reviews.
  • GreenReaper - Thursday, March 2, 2017 - link

    It is just as important to write the reviews for things people should not buy as it is for those they should. Perhaps more-so, so that people avoid making a mistake!
  • ex_User - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Haven't you forgotten to change the following line on overclocking page: "MSI has improved its overclocking options as of late on the Z170 platform(...)"?
  • jardows2 - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Little confused. The chart shows the i7-6950X as 10 core/ 20 threads, but you state it is"a full $634 more than the 8-core i7-6900K"

    I thought the i76900K was 4 core - 8 threads. Am I missing something here?
  • GTRagnarok - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    6900K is 8C/16T. Maybe you're thinking of the mainstream Skylake 6700K?
  • jardows2 - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    That would be my confusion! Thanks for setting me straight!
  • mapesdhs - Thursday, June 9, 2016 - link

    Don't blame yourself, Intel's product naming is really dumb.
  • zeeBomb - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Golly...dreams money CAN'T buy.
  • maxxbot - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    I've been easy on Intel these past few years but they deserve nothing but ridicule for this launch, the fact that you still need a spend a full $1000 for any 8-core CPU is a disgrace.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now