Alien: Isolation

If first person survival mixed with horror is your sort of thing, then Alien: Isolation, based off of the Alien franchise, should be an interesting title. Developed by The Creative Assembly and released in October 2014, Alien: Isolation has won numerous awards from Game Of The Year to several top 10s/25s and Best Horror titles, ratcheting up over a million sales by February 2015. Alien: Isolation uses a custom built engine which includes dynamic sound effects and should be fully multi-core enabled.

Alien Isolation on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

Alien Isolation on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Total War: Attila

The Total War franchise moves on to Attila, another The Creative Assembly development, and is a stand-alone strategy title set in 395AD where the main story line lets the gamer take control of the leader of the Huns in order to conquer parts of the world. Graphically the game can render hundreds/thousands of units on screen at once, all with their individual actions and can put some of the big cards to task.

For low end graphics, we test at 720p with performance settings, recording the average frame rate. With mid and high range graphics, we test at 1080p with the quality setting. In both circumstances, unlimited video memory is enabled and the in-game scripted benchmark is used.

Total War: Attila on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

Total War: Attila on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Grand Theft Auto V

The highly anticipated iteration of the Grand Theft Auto franchise finally hit the shelves on April 14th 2015, with both AMD and NVIDIA in tow to help optimize the title. GTA doesn’t provide graphical presets, but opens up the options to users and extends the boundaries by pushing even the hardest systems to the limit using Rockstar’s Advanced Game Engine. Whether the user is flying high in the mountains with long draw distances or dealing with assorted trash in the city, when cranked up to maximum it creates stunning visuals but hard work for both the CPU and the GPU.

For our test we have scripted a version of the in-game benchmark, relying only on the final part which combines a flight scene along with an in-city drive-by followed by a tanker explosion. For low end systems we test at 720p on the lowest settings, whereas mid and high-end graphics play at 1080p with very high settings across the board. We record both the average frame rate and the percentage of frames under 60 FPS (16.6ms).

Grand Theft Auto V on ASUS GTX 980 Strix 4GB ($560)

Grand Theft Auto V on MSI R9 290X Gaming LE 4GB ($380)

Professional Performance on Linux Gaming, Cont: GRID: Autosport & Shadow of Mordor
Comments Locked

205 Comments

View All Comments

  • jwcalla - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    No time for a 1070 review but a dozen-page day-one review for a platform nobody is going to buy.
  • rhysiam - Wednesday, June 1, 2016 - link

    Different authors. It's Ryan Smith who tackles the GPU reviews.
  • GreenReaper - Thursday, March 2, 2017 - link

    It is just as important to write the reviews for things people should not buy as it is for those they should. Perhaps more-so, so that people avoid making a mistake!
  • ex_User - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Haven't you forgotten to change the following line on overclocking page: "MSI has improved its overclocking options as of late on the Z170 platform(...)"?
  • jardows2 - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Little confused. The chart shows the i7-6950X as 10 core/ 20 threads, but you state it is"a full $634 more than the 8-core i7-6900K"

    I thought the i76900K was 4 core - 8 threads. Am I missing something here?
  • GTRagnarok - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    6900K is 8C/16T. Maybe you're thinking of the mainstream Skylake 6700K?
  • jardows2 - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    That would be my confusion! Thanks for setting me straight!
  • mapesdhs - Thursday, June 9, 2016 - link

    Don't blame yourself, Intel's product naming is really dumb.
  • zeeBomb - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    Golly...dreams money CAN'T buy.
  • maxxbot - Tuesday, May 31, 2016 - link

    I've been easy on Intel these past few years but they deserve nothing but ridicule for this launch, the fact that you still need a spend a full $1000 for any 8-core CPU is a disgrace.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now