First Thoughts

Wrapping up our preview of the GeForce GTX 1080, I think it’s safe to say that NVIDIA intends to start off the 16nm/14nm generation with a bang. As the first high-end card of this generation the GTX 1080 sets new marks for overall performance and for power efficiency, thanks to the combination of TSMC’s 16nm FinFET process and NVIDIA’s Pascal architecture. Translating this into numbers, at 4K we’re looking at 30% performance gain versus the GTX 980 Ti and a 70% performance gain over the GTX 980, amounting to a very significant jump in efficiency and performance over the Maxwell generation.

Looking at the bigger picture, as the first vendor to launch their 16nm/14nm flagship card, NVIDIA will get to enjoy the first mover’s advantage both with respect to setting performance expectations and with pricing. The GeForce GTX 1080 will keep the performance crown solidly in NVIDIA’s hands, and with it control of the high-end video card market for some time to come.  NVIDIA’s loyal opposition, AMD’s Radeon Technologies Group, has strongly hinted that they’re not going to be releasing comparable high-performance video cards in the near future. Rather the company is looking to make a run at the much larger mainstream market for desktops and laptops with their Polaris architecture, something that GP104 isn’t meant to address.

The lack of competition at the high-end means that for the time being NVIDIA can price the GTX 1080 at what the market will bear, and this is more or less what we’re looking at for NVIDIA’s new card. While the formal MSRP on the GTX 1080 is $599 – $50 over what the GTX 980 launched at – that price is the starting price for custom cards from NVIDIA’s partners. The reference card as we’ve previewed it today – what NVIDIA is calling the Founders Edition card – carries a $100 premium over that, pushing it to $699.

GeForce GTX 1080 Configurations
  Base Founders Edition
Core Clock 1607MHz 1607MHz
Boost Clock 1733MHz 1733MHz
Memory Clock 10Gbps GDDR5X 10Gbps GDDR5X
Cooler Manufacturer Custom
(Typical: 2 or 3 Fan Open Air)
NVIDIA Reference
(Blower w/Vapor Chamber)
Availability Date June 2016? 05/27/2016
Price Starting at $599 $699

While the differences between the reference and custom cards will be a longer subject for our full review, the more immediate ramification is going to be that only the Founders Edition cards are guaranteed to be available at launch. NVIDIA can’t speak definitively for their board partners, but at this point I am not seriously expecting custom cards until June. And this means that if you want one of the first GTX 1080s, then you’re going to have to pay $699 for the Founders Edition card. Which is not to say that it’s a bad card – far from it, it’s probably NVIDIA’s finest reference card to date – however it pushes the card’s price north of 980 Ti territory, some $150 higher than where the GTX 980 launched in 2014. For those who can afford such a card they will not be disappointed, but it’s definitely less affordable than past NVIDIA x80 cards.

Anyhow, we’ll be back later this week with our full review of the GeForce GTX 1080, so be sure to stay tuned.

Spring 2016 GPU Pricing Comparison
AMD Price NVIDIA
  $699 GeForce GTX 1080 FE
Radeon R9 Fury X $609  
  $589 GeForce GTX 980 Ti
  $429 GeForce GTX 980
Radeon R9 390X $399  
Radeon R9 390 $289 GeForce GTX 970
Gaming Performance, Power, Temperature, & Noise
Comments Locked

262 Comments

View All Comments

  • dustwalker13 - Wednesday, May 18, 2016 - link

    kudos as always for being thorough. no overclocked cards, no gameworks, a balanced set of games that have an equal share favoring either nvidia or amd, that makes a balanced review, a rarity these days and highly appreciated.
  • stardude82 - Wednesday, May 18, 2016 - link

    You know, I'm still waiting for that complete GTX 950 review.
  • Sivar - Wednesday, May 18, 2016 - link

    Is it fair to publish relative power consumption in Crysis 3 of the 1080 vs other cards when the 1080 is pushing twice the frame rate of some of those cards?
    Seems like a better comparison would be to lock the framerate such that the lowest-end in the list can keep up, enable vsync, and test power consumption when the cards are doing the same amount of real work.
  • paulemannsen - Thursday, May 19, 2016 - link

    +1, do both
  • nick.evanson - Monday, May 23, 2016 - link

    Would it not still show the same relative differences though? The net power consumptions would obviously be different but the relative differences would simply reflect process size, transistor count, clock, etc; i.e. nothing that would be particularly surprising. Nor useful, I should imagine, even to the user for whom power consumption does matter - would such a user discount a product as being a potential purchase because it does not fit within a required power window or would they examine how best to deal with the additional power requirements and heat generation? Personally I only look at the power figures to gauge how hot my office is going to get :)
  • oobga - Wednesday, May 18, 2016 - link

    Glad all the details of the founders edition are out. Almost bought one. Fortunately was able to cancel my pre-order after finding out there is nothing special about it aside from the name.

    Fingers crossed a good closed system water cooled 1080 comes out soon!
  • Marucins - Thursday, May 19, 2016 - link

    Why is there no computing tests?
    Always Anandtech doing comp. tests and now, during the presentation of the new architecture of a sudden it disappears.
    Why?
  • HollyDOL - Thursday, May 19, 2016 - link

    Maybe because it is a _pre_view?
  • Marucins - Monday, May 23, 2016 - link

    I hope..... I count that the final test will be complete.
  • HollyDOL - Wednesday, May 25, 2016 - link

    my 2 cents bet would be it will come out together with 1070 in one big review

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now