Conclusion

With the Carbide 400Q, Corsair wanted to create a compact and elegant case that also offers good thermal performance and very low noise levels, all for a reasonable price tag. These are just too many eggs for one basket and a single design cannot possibly excel on all five of those areas. It is the balance between them that matters and we feel that Corsair did a fine job balancing their design to the best possible extent.

The Carbide 400Q is one of the most compact cases currently available that can support an Extended ATX motherboard, as well as top tier graphics cards and liquid cooling systems. It cannot support many drives but these are more than enough for the majority of home and office users, most of which own a maximum of two or three drives. There is no support for external drives, forcing users who want to work with optical media to go for an external device. This can be a problem for professionals, especially for those that need to receive or share digital material with their customers. Most home users and gamers will not mind, as the bulk of digital material is being transferred online nowadays.

In terms of quality, the Carbide 400Q is very good overall. The mechanical strength of the steel chassis is excellent. It is next to impossible to bent or twist the chassis, even if a lot of force is applied. The paint job is excellent, highly resistant to fingerprints and scratching. Our only concern lies with the plastic frame of the faceplate. The plastics are thick and of very good quality, but it is very tightly attached to the metallic frame of the case, requiring a lot of force to remove it.

With the stock configuration in mind, the balance between thermal performance and acoustics is towards the latter, but the Carbide 400Q still offers thermal performance comparable to that of most ATX tower cases and can easily support a relatively powerful system. If the user wants to, the Carbide 400Q can support even systems with triple graphics cards and liquid cooling, but that would require the removal of the top panel cover and the installation of more and more powerful fans. This would defeat the purpose of buying the Carbide 400Q in the first place, as the end result would probably be a cramped, noisy setup.

In conclusion, the Carbide 400Q is finely balanced between thermal performance, size and acoustics. It currently retails at it MSRP price of $99, which is reasonable for such a case but, in our opinion, if it could have been a little lower it would be more competitive in a crowded market. Nevertheless, the Carbide 400Q can be a very good choice for a typical gaming PC, allowing for relatively low noise levels and good thermal performance using the stock configuration with the case fan thermally controlled by the motherboard. 

Testing and results
Comments Locked

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • BrokenCrayons - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Agreed! I love the can for size comparison too. It makes me laugh a little when I see it.
  • jardows2 - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    I would have been better with a Dr Pepper can!
  • Holliday75 - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    I'd prefer to see a beer can and some surly language in the view. In vino veritas.
  • just4U - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Hey E,

    You guys getting a review sample of Carbide Series 88R mATX?

    In my opinion the 350D is probably the best matx case on the market.. it's climbed in price (at least here in canada) since launch but still very popular... and my go to case. The 88R looks very similar to it.. kinda curious to see what Anantech thinks of it.
  • lehtv - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    "If it could have been a little lower it would be more competitive in a crowded market."
    This is not the correct way to use the second conditional. The conditional clause needs to be past tense: "If it had been...". It is sad to see a basic mistake like this in the concluding paragraph which pretty much everyone will read.a
  • lehtv - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Oh, and it's either "had been" -> "would have been", or "was" -> "would be".
  • Murloc - Saturday, April 30, 2016 - link

    what about "Had it been a little lower, it would be more competitive in a crowded market"?

    I'm no native speaker but this sounds less convoluted to me than if "If it had been".
  • SpetsnazAntiVIP - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    @Anandtech - There are plenty of companies that will professionally edit your articles for spelling and grammar. I have a friend that does it for edanz. He could probably work something out with your site, if you are interested.
  • zeeBomb - Friday, April 29, 2016 - link

    Best cases that are reasonably cheap?
  • Magda Merz - Saturday, April 30, 2016 - link

    Thoughtful writing . I learned a lot from the insight . Does anyone know if my company could possibly find a sample IRS 5329 example to edit ?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now