The 2015 Razer Blade was a nice evolution in the history of Razer’s 14-inch gaming notebook lineup. This 0.70”, or 17.8 mm thick notebook is built from a solid aluminum chassis, CNC milled and finished with a matte black finish. It is one of the thinnest and lightest gaming laptops around, and yet it still packs in a NVIDIA GTX 970M GPU. Today Razer is announcing an update to the Blade which brings some nice additions to one of the best built notebooks around.

The exterior is very much the same design, which is not a bad thing. It is not identical though. Razer has shaved a bit of weight off of the package, and it is now just 4.25 lbs / 1.92 kg, down from 4.47 lbs / 2.03 kg on the previous generation. The overall finish is the same, but closer inspection reveals the addition of a USB-C port with Thunderbolt 3 as well. With Razer announcing the Razer Core external graphics dock at CES, it was a sure bet that the next Blade would also be compatible, and right on cue, Razer’s lineup which supports their external graphics dock has doubled.

Keeping to the outside, another feature which Razer debuted at CES on the Razer Blade Stealth has also found its way to the Blade, and that is the Chrome keyboard. This anti-ghosting keyboard now supports 16.8 million colors on each individual key, and it supports the Razer SDK so that games and other applications can tap in to the Chroma software to customize the lighting effects on a per-application basis. I like Razer green, but user customization trumps that color any day, and this is a welcome addition.

On the inside, there are some nice updates as well. The CPU is now an Intel Core i7-6700HQ processor, which has a 2.6 GHz base frequency and 3.5 GHz turbo, and this quad-core model also supports hyperthreading. Last year Razer bumped the memory up to 16 GB on the higher end version of the Blade, and that is now standard across the lineup, and it is of course DDR4-2133 with the inclusion of Skylake. NVIDIA hasn’t released any new GPUs in a while, and as we wait for the new FinFET graphics cards to come sometime later this year, Razer has instead moved to the 6 GB GTX 970M option, up from the 3 GB version in the Blade last year. The wireless has also been switched to the Killer Wireless-AC 1535, which can help with latency when gaming. Finally, storage has been switched out to PCIe M.2 SSDs, and for 2016 there will only be 256 GB and 512 GB options, meaning the too small 128 GB version is thankfully no more. When games can be 50 GB on their own, that simply wasn’t enough storage for this type of system.

Razer Blade Comparison
  2015 Razer Blade 2016 Razer Blade
CPU Intel Core i7-4720HQ
quad-core 2.6-3.6GHz 22nm 47W
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
quad-core 2.6-3.5GHz 14nm 47W
GPU NVIDIA GTX 970M 3GB NVIDIA GTX 970M 6GB
Memory 8-16 GB DDR3L-1600 16GB DDR4-2133
Display 1920x1080 IPS matte
3200x1800 IGZO touch
3200x1800 IGZO touch
Storage 128/256/512GB SATA M.2 256/512GB PCIe M.2
I/O 3xUSB 3.0
HDMI 1.4a
3xUSB 3.0
HDMI 1.4b
USB-C Thunderbolt 3
Wireless Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7260 Killer Wireless-AC 1535
Dimensions 13.6" x 9.3 " x 0.70"
345mm x 235mm x 17.8mm
13.6" x 9.3 " x 0.70"
345mm x 235mm x 17.8mm
Weight 1080p Model:
4.19 lbs / 1.9 kg
QHD+ Model:
4.47 lbs / 2.03 kg
4.25 lbs / 1.93 kg
Battery 70 Wh 70 Wh
Keyboard Razer Green anti-ghosting Razer Chroma anti-ghosting
Price $1999-$2699 $1999-$2199

The display is pretty much unchanged. Razer is sticking with their Sharp IGZO 3200x1800 touch display, which we’ve seen on the Blade since 2014. It is a solid panel, offering great clarity, along with good color accuracy. When I say pretty much, the one change is that the short lived 1920x1080p matte offering which lost touch capabilities, but improved battery life, is no longer available. Razer didn’t say whether this would be coming back, but they only told me they would continue listening to customer feedback. It’s possible that this model just didn’t have enough sales to justify the extra SKU.

Possibly the biggest change though is the pricing structure. For 2015, the lowest cost Razer Blade was the 256 GB 1080p model, for $1999, and the touch version started at $2199 for 128 GB and $2399 for 256 GB. For 2016, the entry level Blade with the QHD+ touch display and 256 GB of storage is just $1999, and the 512 GB version adds $200 to that. At the same storage capacity, Razer has lowered the price $400, and it is $500 less for the 512 GB version. That’s a significant cut, although the Razer Blade was certainly a high priced offering before. With the aggressive pricing on the Razer Blade Stealth at $999, Razer seems to be making a move to be a bigger volume player than they were in the past.

The 2016 Razer Blade will be available for pre-order on RazerZone.com tomorrow, with shipments starting in April.

Source: Razer

POST A COMMENT

34 Comments

View All Comments

  • gw74 - Wednesday, March 16, 2016 - link

    no 1080p matte option, no sale Reply
  • steven4570 - Wednesday, March 16, 2016 - link

    Why? Reply
  • Worthymatt - Wednesday, March 16, 2016 - link

    The article comparing 2015 Blade panels mentioned the lack of much dimming capability on the QHD+ (I think the exact quote was something like looking into the sun). Was that ever resolved? If not, could they have fixed this on the 2016 model? I know it seems like an odd concern, but I have super light-sensitive eyes and work in dim light much of the time, so do not want an ultra bright panel I can't turn down to like 20-40% brightness. If that is the case I'll honestly opt for the 2015 FHD matte version (though seems a shame at only a $400 difference right now to take such a huge step backward in performance). My other gripe is they have yet to back-light the special characters on the Chroma keyboards. Again, working in dim light makes this a pain. Reply
  • rlkelly - Thursday, March 17, 2016 - link

    " When I say pretty much, the one change is that the short lived 1920x1080p matte offering which lost touch capabilities, but improved battery life, is no longer available. Razer didn’t say whether this would be coming back, but they only told me they would continue listening to customer feedback. It’s possible that this model just didn’t have enough sales to justify the extra SKU."

    As far as I heard the 1080p screen sold far better then the 4k screen.
    Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now