HTPC Credentials

The thermal solution on the NUC6i5SYK is the same as what we have seen in the previous NUCs. Since the Core i5-6260U is a 15W TDP processor, the acoustics are pretty decent (when compared to the fans on the units with 28W TDP processors). Subjectively speaking, the unit is silent for most common HTPC use-cases. Only under heavy CPU / GPU loading (such as stressful madVR configurations) does the fan become audible. Like the previous NUCs, the NUC6i5SYK retains CIR support, enabling use of IR remotes in a home theater setting. The unit definitely makes a good HTPC for folks who don't want to pay the premium for a passively cooled system - however, we didn't find too many improvements over the previous NUCs for HTPC workloads. There is still no HDMI 2.0 / HDCP 2.2 / 4Kp60 HDMI support in the unit.

Refresh Rate Accuracy

Starting with Haswell, Intel, AMD and NVIDIA have been on par with respect to display refresh rate accuracy. The most important refresh rate for videophiles is obviously 23.976 Hz (the 23 Hz setting). As expected, the Intel NUC6i5SYK has no trouble with refreshing the display appropriately in this setting. In fact, the NUC6i5SYK has the most accurate display refresh rates of all the PCs that we have evaluated so far.

The gallery below presents some of the other refresh rates that we tested out. The first statistic in madVR's OSD indicates the display refresh rate.

Network Streaming Efficiency

Evaluation of OTT playback efficiency was done by playing back our standard YouTube test stream and five minutes from our standard Netflix test title. Using HTML5, the YouTube stream plays back a 1080p encoding. Since YouTube now defaults to HTML5 for video playback, we have stopped evaluating Adobe Flash acceleration. Note that only NVIDIA exposes GPU and VPU loads separately. Both Intel and AMD bundle the decoder load along with the GPU load. The following two graphs show the power consumption at the wall for playback of the HTML5 stream in Mozilla Firefox (v 44.0.2).

YouTube Streaming - HTML5: Power Consumption

GPU load was around 24.27% for the YouTube HTML5 stream and barely measurable for the steady state 6 Mbps Netflix streaming case. Note that GPU usage reported by GPU-Z doesn't actually measure the load on the dedicated decoder engines in the GPU.

Netflix streaming evaluation was done using the Windows 10 Netflix app. Manual stream selection is available (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-S) and debug information / statistics can also be viewed (Ctrl-Alt-Shift-D). Statistics collected for the YouTube streaming experiment were also collected here.

Netflix Streaming - Windows 8.1 Metro App: Power Consumption

Decoding and Rendering Benchmarks

In order to evaluate local file playback, we concentrate on EVR-CP, madVR and Kodi 16.0. We already know that EVR works quite well even with the Intel IGP for our test streams. Under madVR, we used the DXVA2 scaling logic wherever available, and left the rest at default (as it is well known that the stressful configurations don't work even on the Iris Pro-equipped processors). We used the DXVA2 native decoder in the LAV Filters bundled with MPC-HC v1.7.10

In our earlier reviews, we focused on presenting the GPU loading and power consumption at the wall in a table (with problematic streams in bold). Starting with the Broadwell NUC review, we decided to represent the GPU load and power consumption in a graph with dual Y-axes. Nine different test streams of 90 seconds each were played back with a gap of 30 seconds between each of them. The characteristics of each stream are annotated at the bottom of the graph. Note that the GPU usage is graphed in red and needs to be considered against the left axis, while the at-wall power consumption is graphed in green and needs to be considered against the right axis.

Frame drops are evident whenever the GPU load consistently stays above the 85 - 90% mark. The NUC6i5SYK has absolutely no trouble with any of our test streams. Kodi is the most power efficient of the lot, while madVR with DXVA scaling is actually quite power efficient and comparable to EVR-CP.

Moving on to the codec support, the Intel Iris Graphics 540 is a known quantity with respect to the scope of supported hardware accelerated codecs. DXVA Checker serves as a confirmation. Recent driver updates have added VP9 decode support, but, only for 8b encodes.

Networking and Storage Performance Power Consumption and Thermal Performance
Comments Locked

95 Comments

View All Comments

  • ganeshts - Saturday, March 12, 2016 - link

    That is what I am saying - My understanding is that Intel's DisplayPort output is NOT HDCP 2.2 capable (but, I am open to correction, if someone can provide a credible source to back it up).
  • whitehat2k9 - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    NUCs have become excellent options for just about everything except (serious) gaming. If Intel released a gaming-class NUC that was capable of taking a full-size/double-slot GPU, that would be amazing.
  • ganeshts - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    Skull Canyon with external Thunderbolt 3 like the AMD XConnect is coming soon, just for consumers like you :)
  • gigahertz20 - Friday, March 11, 2016 - link

    I'm very interested in seeing a review on skull canyon with an external graphics card, might be the perfect little gaming machine. Once it's available, I hope to see a review Ganesh!
  • zodiacfml - Saturday, March 12, 2016 - link

    The last sentence in the article screams this feature. :)
  • zodiacfml - Saturday, March 12, 2016 - link

    I meant, the Thunderbolt 3 part.
  • Teknobug - Sunday, March 13, 2016 - link

    External GPU would ge a fantastic option.
  • fallaha56 - Saturday, March 12, 2016 - link

    obvious mistake: no thunderbolt 3 port for external graphics
  • Blindsay - Saturday, March 12, 2016 - link

    The Skull Canyon version should have it, not sure its really relevant on the i3 or i5 versions
  • AnnonymousCoward - Saturday, March 12, 2016 - link

    What do you need TB3 for?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now