Display

Dell offers two displays on the XPS 15. The base model is a 1920x1080 IPS panel. It’s likely reasonable for most people, but for this review Dell configured out review unit with the upgraded 3840x2160 (UHD) display. This is more than just a resolution bump too. The UHD display also has a backlight which can cover 100% of the Adobe RGB color gamut, or so Dell claims. The standard offering is sRGB only, and the Adobe RGB color space is quite a bit larger, offering more saturation in colors.

However, the majority of the web and most consumer-grade applications are made for the sRGB color space only, so if you use an Adobe RGB display with sRGB as the expected color space, you’ll get an oversaturated image. Display manufacturers combat this by generally offering a way to pick which color space you want to work in. If you are browsing the web, you can choose sRGB, and if you are touching up photos that were captured in Adobe RGB, switch the display to that color space. Dell does this through their PremierColor application on the XPS 15

You can easily switch between the color spaces, as well as several others including DCI-P3 (though I would be somewhat surprised if it could hit it at 100%) and Rec. 709 (which is functionally identical to sRGB), depending on what you are working on. If you open the advanced features, you can tune the color temperature, gamma, and black levels as well. If you don’t have color calibration hardware, this is a quick and dirty way to adjust the display to make it more pleasing.

While we’re in here, Dell also offers another cool feature with this software. They call it the Display Splitter, and its basically an improved version of Windows Snap. You can pick how you want to segment your display, and then when you are dragging windows around, the Display Splitter image will appear. Put the window on the box you want, and the software automatically resizes it and snaps it to the correct location. This is pretty great, and Microsoft should take note of this and work with Dell to get it added to Windows.

Back to the display though, there is sometimes some misconceptions that a display that covers Adobe RGB is going to be more accurate out of the box than one that does not. In fact, it really has no bearing on accuracy at all. What Adobe RGB does is offer a wider gamut of colors, and its up to the laptop manufacturer to ensure that the correct calibration is done to map the correct colors to the display output. To test this, we use SpectraCal’s CalMAN 5 software with a custom workflow. Brightness and contrast are measured with an X-Rite i1Display Pro colorimeter, and color accuracy is tested with an X-Rite i1Pro2 Spectrophotometer.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The XPS 15 display can get up to 334 nits, which is plenty bright enough for most tasks, and impressive considering the resolution. Good black levels also lead to a contrast ratio over 1000:1, which is respectable. It’s not class leading anymore, but it’s still a good result. For those that are interested, the display will also go all the way down to 13 nits which should be dim enough for working in the dark.

Grayscale

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Display - White Point

sRGB Grayscale

Adobe RGB Grayscale

Out of the box, the grayscale is not very accurate in either the sRGB or Adobe RGB color spaces. The display has a definite blue cast to it as well, and that plays out in the high color temperature. Gamma is quite good though on both, but Dell should have provided an ICC profile at the minimum to help out with grayscale (or better yet, a calibrated LUT). The UHD display is over a $300 option, so it should be much better calibrated than it is. The color comparator shows how blue the images are.

Saturation

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The saturation tests show a better picture than the grayscale though. On both color spaces, the saturation sweeps track nicely all the way to the edges of the gamut. Really only the poor showing on 100% white throws these scores off, with both having an average under 3.0. The images show just how much wider the Adobe RGB space is, and it’s great to see accurate tracking in both modes.

Gretag MacBeth

Display - GMB Accuracy

The most comprehensive test is the Gretag MacBeth, which tests an assortment of colors all over the spectrum. It has quite a few flesh tones tested as well. The XPS 15 does ok here too, but is certainly let down by the inaccurate grayscale results.

Calibrated Results

Luckily the biggest issue with the XPS 15 display is grayscale, and that is the one thing that can be adjusted through calibration. I ran the calibration on both the sRGB space and the Adobe RGB space. This had a much bigger impact on the GMB and Saturation scores than normal, since it was the inaccurate grays that were impacting the scores the most.

In sRGB mode, the Delta E for grayscale dropped to 1.6, saturation accuracy was 1.33, and GMB was 1.61, all of which are much better scores than the uncalibrated results. Adobe RGB had an even better grayscale Delta E of 0.9, saturation of 1.0, and GMB of 1.2. Once calibrated, this display is highly accurate. It’s just too bad that Dell didn’t take the time to calibrate it at the factory.

Other than the grayscale issues, the UHD display in the XPS 15 is quite good. It’s great to see more devices starting to offer wider color gamut support, and Dell was good enough to include software to switch the color space as needed.

Compute and Storage Performance Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

152 Comments

View All Comments

  • Zak - Friday, March 4, 2016 - link

    All of these picture are below eBay quality. I'm not put off of a machine but I'm not going to waste my time reading the review either for its perceived lack of professionalism.
  • Beany2013 - Saturday, March 5, 2016 - link

    That's a staggeringly childish attitude to have, no matter how you cut it.
  • thesloth - Friday, March 4, 2016 - link

    Quit complaining - the pictures look fine.
  • XLNC - Friday, March 4, 2016 - link

    He's absolutely right. These pictures look amateurish. Flash photography with a wide angle lens? We should expect more from AT.

    Also, couldn't a better wallpaper been chosen for the display shot? One that fills the screen without black side bars, perhaps.
  • WhisperingEye - Sunday, March 6, 2016 - link

    It's like one of those fun houses, where the hallway has a door at the end, but when you try to walk down it, you realize it's only three feet long and the door is tiny. These pictures are all wonky, but I like this laptop which I didn't know about 10 minutes ago.
  • Daniel Egger - Friday, March 4, 2016 - link

    I totally agree. The images are a huge turnoff and it's very saddening to see that AT still cannot get around to improve the quality of the images.

    I don't even think that it would be necessary to produce studio quality photos. But some simple measures like making sure there no flares and reflections in the image when shooting and some basic preprocessing straightening out the lines (simple click on "Upright Auto" in Lightroom), doing a white balance and an automatic image adjustment would go a *long* way.
  • Chrisrodinis1 - Friday, March 4, 2016 - link

    Hi Euskalzabe! Can you please critique the video we just posted on the FX2 G13 enclosure? Thanks!
  • osxandwindows - Friday, March 4, 2016 - link

    took you long enough.
  • zepi - Friday, March 4, 2016 - link

    XPS 15.6" 16:9 screen : 357 x 235 x 11-17
    RMBP 15.4" 16:10 screen : 359 x 247 x 18

    I don't know if I buy the argument of this being 14" size device.
  • zepi - Friday, March 4, 2016 - link

    Though it is for sure smaller than your average 15" PC laptop, that much is sure.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now