Over the past year, ASUS have built a solid graphical UEFI interface which, personally as a reviewer, covers almost everything I want in a BIOS. Rather than break something that works, ASUS have worked a little on the implementation for X79 to improve the functionality. The main change here is the shortcut menu, found by pressing F3. Rather than requiring the user to navigate through menus and deciding what is a deeper menu or not, the most frequently used options in the BIOS are listed and are now only a click away. As a long time BIOS user, I do not find much need for this – I am fairly adept at navigating through the BIOS via keyboard at speed. However, for just wanting to flash a new BIOS (I always prefer doing it in the BIOS itself), I found it quite useful.

However, the user starts off in EZ mode – a simple to use screen full of information that any user or admin would want. For a start, telling us what board we are using, the processor, detected memory and speeds, CPU temperatures, voltages, fan speeds and the boot order is something every vendor should show on the front screen. ASUS has implemented this spot on. From this page, a user will be able to tell if memory is not detected, select an overall ‘faster’ or ‘greener’ mode, or arrange the boot order.

Inside the advanced mode, we have a more vintage feel of the BIOS options. Almost all the options here are selectable in a variety of ways – mouse and submenu, keyboard and submenu, or in the case of values, keyboard and typing. As a keyboard/typist sort of BIOS user, I feel frustrated when in an attempt to go graphical a motherboard manufacturer will force you to sift through a list going from 0.8 V to 1.65 V in the memory in 0.0075 V increments. There are no such problems here in ASUS’ implementation.

AI Tweaker modes come in Auto, Normal or XMP, which allows the user to define BCLK frequencies to the nearest 0.1 MHz, the CPU Strap (1.00x, 1.25x, 1.66x or 2.50x), target CPU ratios for per core usage, and the memory strap. Sub menus provide DRAM timings, where ASUS provide a seemingly endless level of detail on what users can select for their memory, control over the DIGI+ power delivery (also available in the OS), and a variety of CPU performance settings. Voltage adjustment is available underneath this, where most voltages are simple value selections, but the CPU voltage is also available in offset mode.

By pressing F5, the BIOS will revert to Intel defaults on all these values, but by pressing F6, the BIOS will default to ASUS values, which offer a change in performance. Personally, the only change I was able to discern is that this turned per core turbo ratios off, and put the i7-3960X (6C/12T, 3.3 GHz, 3.9 GHz Turbo) into a full turbo mode on any core operation. Actually, whenever I changed any part of the BIOS, this occurred. By changing any DRAM or memory timings/ratios, or setting XMP, or changing the BCLK/multiplier, rather than the CPU go into a normal mode (39x/39x/37x/37x/36x/36x ratios on 1/2/3/4/5/6 core usage), it implemented the max turbo for any CPU usage. This put a little spanner in the works regarding our benchmark suite, which as I will mention on the test setup page, I adapted the operation to standard.

One feature I have been pushing motherboard manufacturers on for Sandy Bridge is that AHCI mode is enabled be default. So far, as much as I can tell, only ASUS on their high end products have done this. So with X79, this is the time to make the change – which ASUS have done on their Pro board, which is not their high end board. Hopefully, when looking at some of the other vendors’ implementations, they have done likewise.

Under the Monitor heading are the BIOS fan controls, which allow almost full control over the fans (the OS software is better adapted to this). All four chassis fan headers are controllable individually, and the two CPU fan headers act under the same control.

Overclocking on X79

The realm of overclocking has changed in recent months, especially in the hands of Intel. If we take the previous enthusiast platform, X58 and LGA 1366, a full array of BCLK and multiplier adjustments were available. Personally, I moved from that platform (and my trusty i7-920 D0) to P67 and Sandy Bridge, where due to the clock generator arrangement, I had access to the multiplier and perhaps +/- 2-5 MHz on the BCLK. In terms of the joy of overclocking, this was a bit of a let down – but Intel has (sort of) met in the middle with X79.

On a basic level, we have a standard clock generator pumping out 100 MHz. This is split several ways, most notably one way to the CPU and memory through a buffer chip, and one way to everything else. Using this buffer chip, we can select four gears/ratios: 1.00x, 1.25x, 1.66x and 2.50x. As a result, we can send 100 MHz, 125 MHz, 166 MHz and 250 MHz to the CPU/memory, while restricting everything else to 100 MHz. The basic 100 MHz, like P67/Z68, can be adjusted – usually by +/- 2-5 MHz as Sandy Bridge was able. On top of all this, we also have multiplier adjustment.

With this in mind, I can already tell you that the majority of overclocks from system builders will be on the 1.25x ratio. It provides a simple 25% overclock if the multipliers are not changed, and providing they are using Intel’s all-in-one liquid cooling as a minimum (or a high end air cooler), temperatures should not be an issue. No doubt we will see motherboards that implement this as a one-button option on the motherboard – ASUS’ auto overclock option does something similar. In order to push the memory, users may opt for the 1.25x ratio, and then decrease the multiplier to a reasonable temperature level.

In terms of the ASUS’ board performance, I first had a go at the auto OC options.

Auto OC

ASUS offers a ‘Fast’ and an ‘Extreme’ mode in their software options. ‘OC Tuner’ in the BIOS, and activating the TPU switch on board, both default to the Fast mode. In this fast mode, we see a jump to the 1.25x CPU ratio, and a slight increase in the BCLK with a multiplier adjustment. Instantly, this equates to a 34x multiplier with a 126.4 MHz BCLK, giving 4296 MHz, which hits 68ºC in Cinebench (20ºC ambient max).

In Extreme mode, ASUS uses a series of algorithms and stress tests to determine the maximum frequency. Usually, I am underwhelmed by this option in my previous reviews, providing no real insight into the depth of the CPU. Despite this, the Extreme mode did run tests, BSOD and eventually reach a final speed without any intervention. A simple 35x multiplier and 127.9 MHz BCLK (4476 MHz) is good enhancement over the Fast auto OC option. However, it may worry some people that the CPU registered an 88ºC temperature when stress tested.

Manual OC

In terms of manual adjustment, my main focus here was the multiplier. Booting at 45x, with auto voltages and the CPU fan/pump set at 100%, the board was stable. However, it was pulling 1.496 V at load, resulting in 90ºC under full OCCT stress – far too hot for my liking, and this is outside a case! But setting the voltage manually to 1.4 V, the board still booted happily at 45x, giving only 82ºC under stress. The board would boot at 46x, but was unstable at 47x.

At the 46x multiplier, at 1.4 V, with load line calibration at auto, the CPU would hit 82ºC under OCCT or Blender Stress, and only 73ºC for the 3DPM multithreaded (3DPM-MT) benchmark. At this speed (4.6 GHz, 6 cores, 12 threads), our 3DPM-MT gave a score of 1145.66, up from 914.76 at stock.


Of note with this BIOS (0709), is that when I populated the memory slots with 4x4GB DDR3, the board would default to the nearest JEDEC speed timings of the kit to 1600 MHz – in this case, my G.Skill kit has a JEDEC of 1676 MHz at 11-11-11, so the board defaulted to 1600 11-11-11. When I selected 1866 MHz memory, it shifted to 9-9-9, disregarding JEDEC vales.

The XMP profile was easy enough to enable with the XMP mode. For more performance, I pushed the board on to the 2400 MHz strap, which booted at auto values of 10-11-10 2T, and was completely stable. Moving towards the 2666 MHz strap caused failed boots. The nearest strap while on the 1.25x ratio was only at 2333 MHz, suggesting that 2400 MHz on the 1.00x strap is a safe memory overclock.

ASUS P9X79 Pro - Overview and Visual Inspection Board Features, In The Box, Software
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • buildingblock - Monday, November 14, 2011 - link

    Amongst all the other goodies, the outstanding feature for me is the BIOS fan control. Well done to Asus, this board has probably the best PWM based fan control yet. Other board makers, particularly GigaByte, please take note.
  • ASUSTechMKT - Monday, November 14, 2011 - link

    Thanks so much for the feedback. We have been working hard to consistently improve in the quality of fan controls. Kudos to Ian for taking the time to detail it as well. This is somethign we have to take more time in the development ( Super I/O controller and frmware and software ) but any serious enthuiast can appreciate the additional functionality and increased usability.

    Thanks again!
  • jigglywiggly - Monday, November 14, 2011 - link

    am i the only one kind of dissapointed? No integrated gpu is lame, also not that much faster.
  • Kougar - Monday, November 14, 2011 - link

    Holy moly, $330 for just the Pro?

    Given the extreme prices involved here, I'd especially like to know the key differences between the Pro and the Deluxe models, and even the Pro and the vanilla model as well.
  • ASUSTechMKT - Monday, November 14, 2011 - link


    Offers BT3.0 with Wifi, Additionally USB3, Dual Lan, A more advanced VRM heatsink assembly,

    In regards to the pricing it is important to remember many of the additional items incorporated have a higher cost ( such as the hardware required to allow for UEFI flashing with CPU, Memory or a Graphics card this required a hardware level IC, the more advanced super I/O controller with more advanced fan controls for all the headers ) These additional touches add to the total cost of the board.
  • Kougar - Monday, November 14, 2011 - link

    Thank you for the reply!

    For anyone else curious, after some digging I can say that in addition to the above, P9X79 Vanilla also loses the Marvell controller and associated SATA 6Gb/s ports. The Realtek sound chip also changes from a 898 to the 892, not sure what the difference is. The PWM phase design appears to remain unchanged between the vanilla and PRO models, while the Deluxe doubles the CPU & uncore phases.

    Somewhat oddly, the P9X79 also gains a firewire port over the PRO model.
  • ASUSTechMKT - Wednesday, November 16, 2011 - link

    Yes as you go up the boards you will also have more USB 3 (as the PRO has more USB which makes sense as 1394 is a legacy standard). Main reason it is offered on the Standard is that this model is adopted by sometimes business or professionals you still need some legacy connections.

    In regards to the overall VRM design we use the same high quality dual N mosfet package on all three boards and advanced driver this aligns with the high amperage rated choke. While the "phase" is increased on the Deluxe this only helps to slightly improve balancing of the VRM otherwise the performance for overall power delivery is rated the same. (Although the advanced heatsink design as you move up will help to ensure a cooler operating temperature for the VRM assembly.

    Hope it helps!
  • Filiprino - Monday, November 14, 2011 - link

    There was a rumour saying ASUS would release a dual socket LGA2011 motherboard to compete with EVGA SR-3. Any news?
  • Kougar - Monday, November 14, 2011 - link

    The board exists, but I haven't seen anything about it so far. Very curious to see it and the EVGA SR-3 compared, even if just to drool over!
  • ASUSTechMKT - Wednesday, November 16, 2011 - link

    Sorry cannot comment on that one......

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now