Miscellaneous Aspects and Concluding Remarks

Networking and storage are aspects that may be of vital importance in specific PC use-cases. The ASRock NUC BOX-1360P/D5 comes with the Wi-Fi 6E AX210 WLAN card that also include Bluetooth 5.3 support. On the wired front, we have a couple of 2.5 Gbps ports backed by the Intel I226-LM and I2260V controllers. The system only supports vPro Essentials - so the full extent of remote management over a dedicated LAN port that can be obtained with vPro for Enterprise is sadly absent.

On the storage side, some applications require wide-temperature range and/or high endurance SSDs. The ASRock Industrial NUC BOX-1360P/D5 supports PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSDs (and we used one in our configuration). However, cooling those within the space constraints imposed by the form-factor of the NUC is very challenging, as we saw in the SSD temperature graph in the previous section. In the absence of an effective thermal solution, it might be a better option to stick with a PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe SSD for this unit. From a benchmarking perspective, we provide results from the WPCstorage test of SPECworkstation 3.1. This benchmark replays access traces from various programs used in different verticals and compares the score against the one obtained with a 2017 SanDisk 512GB SATA SSD in the SPECworkstation 3.1 reference system

SPECworkstation 3.1.0 - WPCstorage SPEC Ratio Scores

The graphs above present results for different verticals, as grouped by SPECworkstation 3.1. The storage workload consists of 60 subtests. Access traces from CFD solvers and programs such as Catia, Creo, and Solidworks come under 'Product Development'. Storage access traces from the NAMD and LAMMPS molecular dynamics simulator are under the 'Life Sciences' category. 'General Operations' includes access traces from 7-Zip and Mozilla programs. The 'Energy' category replays traces from the energy-02 SPECviewperf workload. The 'Media and Entertainment' vertical includes Handbrake, Maya, and 3dsmax. Given that the comparison is between a wide range of SSDs in the systems - including both Gen 3 and Gen 4 / DRAM-equipped and DRAMless NVMe, the relative numbers for most workloads are not surprising. The Samsung SSD 980 PRO was a high-end flagship model, and the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 is able to bring out its performance capabilities (despite the SSD overheating concern, which is an orthogonal issue)

Closing Thoughts

ASRock Industrial has one of the most comprehensive Raptor Lake UCFF PC lineups in the market today. The company has a wide variety of options to choose from this year - in addition to the NUC(S) BOX-13xx/D4 and the NUC BOX-13xx/D5 reviewed here, the AMD-based 4X4 BOX-7735U is also a very credible contender. In fact, the AMD system fares much better than the Intel one over a number of different benchmarks, thanks to the presence of eight high-performance cores (compared to the 4P + 8E configuration of the Core i7-1360P). Even on the I/O front, the presence of two USB4 ports (compared to 1x USB 4 / Thunderbolt 4, and 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2x2) is also an advantage for the AMD system. It is frugal in terms of peak power consumption while delivering largely similar performance numbers when averaged across multiple workloads.

DDR5 support does give the edge in many of the workloads for the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 over the NUCS BOX-1360P/D4. However, many AMD mini-PCs with DDR5-5200 and DDR5-5600 support have already started appearing in the market. Under such circumstances, the DDR5-4800 support in the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 appears a bit dated. That said, the inclusion of USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 support in the Type-C ports is a very welcome update over the NUC BOX-1200 and the NUCS BOX-13xx/D4 series.

ASRock Industrial is no stranger to UCFF PCs, and that shows in the robust build and performance profile of the NUC BOX-1360P/D5. The system is an excellent Intel option in the mini-PC space, and the feature set and performance profile have been optimized under the constraints imposed by the form-factor. On the pricing front, the company has decided to introduce the NUC BOX-1360P/D5 at $670. The NUC BOX-1340P/D5 with similar features (based on the Core i5-1340P instead of the Core i7-1360P) is available for $540.

The only areas of concern that we had from our evaluation are the absence of a proper thermal solution for the SSD and the inability of the thermal solution to sustain a 40W PL1 indefinitely while maintaining a safe temperature for the processor package. The form-factor adopted by the system is usually meant for 28W TDP systems, and is hence not a big surprise. Despite these minor quibbles, we have to say that ASRock Industrial's NUC BOX-1360P/D5 presents consumers with a credible alternative to the DDR4-only Arena Canyon NUC in the mainstream class.

Power Consumption and Thermal Characteristics
Comments Locked

21 Comments

View All Comments

  • Grapple - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 - link

    Would love to see an Intel T-series (35W) processor SFF/UCFF in the comparison mix, such as the Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny or its predecessor, the P360 Tiny.
  • meacupla - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 - link

    It seems like it is only worth it, if it cost less than a 7735U or 7740U
  • nandnandnand - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    You mean 7840U. There is no 7740U.
  • meacupla - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    yeah, that one. I hate AMD's naming scheme. It's so confusing.
  • fallaha56 - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    Yes but the Zen4 7840U will destroy the Intel chip

    Odd not to see one of the many models of equivalent AMD NUC here…
  • sjkpublic@gmail.com - Thursday, July 20, 2023 - link

    The Intel version is roughly $200-300 more than a 7735U which is roughly equal in performance.
    I got tired of all the Intel microcode patches and went AMD. On top of that Intel has the ME which is not really needed for the single user and is another security hole.
  • Samus - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 - link

    It's good to see they took Thunderbolt into consideration here. That's a real oversight to this day on professional and enterprise products that annoys the crap out of me, ie, the Probook 450 G9 and 650 G9 are identical down to the case and internals except for one IC (Burnside) that adds TB4. PCIe 4.0 storage is nerfed in firmware on the 450 (limited to 3.0) but easily reactivated with a hex editor.

    The 650 model sells at a $300 MSRP markup over the nerfed 450. It's ridiculous.

    That said, if this thing has full TB4, it's strange they are using so much real estate for display ports when they could put 2x TB4 Type-C ports in their place offering substantially more capability. Throw in a $5 dongle for DP.
  • meacupla - Tuesday, July 18, 2023 - link

    USB-C to Displayport adapters are usually $15~20
  • Samus - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    $8 on Amazon, $10 for Lenovo branded one, and those are retail price. An OEM buying thousands in bulk will get them for a few bucks a pop. Not to mention the ports are cheaper and simpler to implement on a PCB over the higher pin count (and license requirements) or HDMI. The whole thing stinks like yesterdays diapers.
  • fallaha56 - Wednesday, July 19, 2023 - link

    Come on guys

    Any Zen4 7840U NUC will destroy the ‘cutting edge’ Intel chip here

    Let’s see one of the many models of equivalent AMD NUC reviewed…

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now