System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, POST time and latency. This can come down to the manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For Z590 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 20H2 update.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single MSI GTX 1080 Gaming configuration with a wall meter connected to the power supply. Our power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our testbed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 1080)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 1080)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 1080)

Compared to other models on test, the ASRock performs very well in our power testing, with some of the lowest long idle and full-load figures at test. In our full-load testing, the Steel Legend peaked at just under 237 W, which is very respectable.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows-specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

In our non UEFI POST time testing, the ASRock was slower than other Z590 models we've tested. It took us 25 seconds from cold boot to POST into Windows, which we managed to shave down to 23.6 seconds with non-essential controllers such as networking and audio disabled.

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

We test DPC latency out of the box with no manual optimizations, and as we find with ASRock models, the Steel Legend performed better than the majority of LGA1200 model's we've tested so far.

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

15 Comments

View All Comments

  • Leeea - Friday, August 6, 2021 - link

    I never forgiven AsRock & Intel removing overclocking from my "budget overclockers" H97M-ITX/ac with a BIOS update after the fact. A BIOS update required in order to upgrade to windows 10 or install patches.

    Nothing like having your product segmented after the purchase. -grumble grumble-
  • Spunjji - Friday, August 6, 2021 - link

    Don't think ASRock had much choice about that one - IIRC they were bypassing Intel's official guidance, and Intel have historically been quite brutal with companies that don't step back into line when asked.
  • Leeea - Friday, August 6, 2021 - link

    "IIRC they were bypassing Intel's official guidance" - So it was a hack job. How does that make AsRock any less scummy here?
  • Shlong - Friday, August 6, 2021 - link

    I like Asrock. They released bios updates (which angered AMD) to allow my X370 Taichi to work with Zen 3 5900X.
  • Lord of the Bored - Friday, August 6, 2021 - link

    It isn't that it was a hack job, it is that they weren't going to be able to buy anything from Intel ever again if they didn't change it.

    They were really between a rock and a hard place.
  • YB1064 - Friday, August 6, 2021 - link

    ASRock seem to be steadily sliding backwards. I think their last "good" offering was the z270 SuperCarrier.
  • edzieba - Friday, August 6, 2021 - link

    ASRock are still king when it comes to SFF systems, from bonkers ITX boards (X299? Yup. LGA-3647? Sure, we can cram one on there. Hell, we'll throw in quad-channel too! ITX NAS board hosting 12 drives without an add-in card? Why the heck not!) to just dreaming up new form-factors to fill a niche (e.g. Micro STX, a socketable 5x5 board with an MXM slot). With the vanishingly small difference between boards within a form-factor (PCB colour and flavour of RGB aside, basically any two ATX boards will do exactly the same thing within a margin of error) it's much appreciated having something out of the ordinary to offer.
  • HideOut - Friday, August 6, 2021 - link

    I just dont get th e 5 year old+ audio codec. Its like $2 for the 1200 series...
  • Destoya - Saturday, August 7, 2021 - link

    Yeah, part of the reason I ended up with a Z590 Aorus Elite AX ($220). The most well-rounded offering in this $200-250 range, in my opinion. ALC1200 audio, same Wifi6 module as this board, 4 more USB ports, neutral color scheme, decent bios for overclocking.
  • WaltC - Saturday, August 7, 2021 - link

    I don't usually comment on how a motherboard looks, as looks add nothing to performance or compatibility--but I'll make an exception in this case. That's the ugliest motherboard I've ever seen and I have seen a lot of motherboards...;)

    Also, cannot figure why with its latest chipset Intel still cannot deliver a system-wide PCIe4.x bus! Just one indicator of how far behind Intel still is. I mean, why buy a $230 Z590 motherboard when you can buy any number of x570 motherboards for that or less, with system-wide PCIe4 bus support? Doesn't seem rational, actually. (No need to mention the big differences between the latest Intel CPUs and AMD's, either.)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now