Intel Processors - Socket 478

Much like the AMD camp who has plenty of users not interested in buying a new motherboard, and various other components, but rather the latest and greatest processors offered, the 478-based P4 still has enough life left in it to be a viable option for upgrading or even building a new system. Unless you wish to fork over money for a new motherboard, and quite possibly a new video card and new RAM, then socket 478 is still the way to go.

Just short of the $200-mark is the Intel Pentium 4 (478) 3.0GHz 800FSB 512KB. $200 may be a somewhat high price point for a processor, which is going to have its socket decommissioned in a short period of time, but that price is still very much lower than the potential cost to adopt socket 775 in one fell swoop. There's also no difference in the processor architecture itself that really warrants moving to 775 right now and this makes 478 want to stick around a little longer while it still can.

Intel Pentium 4 (478) 3.0GHz 800FSB 512KB 120 Day Analysis



Intel Processors – Socket 775 Intel Processors – Celeron
Comments Locked

13 Comments

View All Comments

  • Chadder007 - Friday, November 19, 2004 - link

    "N'wood S478 3.4c $133 more than 3.4 Prescott. Unbelievable. You can see what people are buying. intel should continue with N'wood and S478. "

    I agree about Socket 478....Intel didn't care to give those users too much of an upgrade path and just jumped all over to the new socket way too soon with little justification to do so.
  • qballshalls2002 - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    Still waiting for the nForce4 boards to show before I go slurging again. Hehehe!
  • aw - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    Haha...sorry...I meant if you were trying to get to 1:1 DDR600 like a lot of Anandtechers are inclined to do. My DDR is bigger than your DDR

    ;-)
  • jmke - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    " The only thing that will hold it back is the quality of your RAM... "

    most A64 boards features excellent memory:htt(fsb) dividers, and the impact on performance versus running memory at 1:1 is minimal
  • aw - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    I agree with #8. My new 3000+ easily hits 2.4ghz which makes it $160 3800+. The only thing that will hold it back is the quality of your RAM...
  • arswihart - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    why get Athlon64 3200+ 90nm instead of 3000+? Can't they both overclock the same, as shown in Anand's own tests?
  • bofkentucky - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    In the 9xx board section, its is the intel 915 chipset, not 912.
  • Pumpkinierre - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    N'wood S478 3.4c $133 more than 3.4 Prescott. Unbelievable. You can see what people are buying. intel should continue with N'wood and S478.
  • PseudoKnight - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    The Athlon XP 2800+ is flipping me off. I'm scared.
  • slurmsmackenzie - Thursday, November 18, 2004 - link

    how come the 915 chipset isn't listed? it offers pci-e without the conversion to ddr2? anandtech always puts the emphasis on the fact that an upgrade to 775 is an entire system overhaul, when 915 offers the meager upgrade of processor/mobo, or cpu/mobo/video card without a performance drop from 925x. so why a 925x board is suggested for price/performance efficiency is beyond me.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now