Hard Drives: SATA

While there aren't any truly compelling reasons yet to buy a SATA drive over a PATA one, some may find the small differences to be convenient or useful. The smaller cables used can help with internal cable routing quite a bit if you are working with a cramped case or even a small form-factor system where getting air flow to critical components can be a major challenge. Additionally, many older power supplies do not come with connectors for SATA power, which would create the need for an adapter, a new power supply, or one of the fairly numerous SATA drives that still sport the classic Molex connection with which everyone is familiar. Otherwise, there really isn't too much to push SATA to the average consumer except for a few situations.

With the above in mind, one of the biggest reasons why many power users and enthusiasts may want to switch to SATA is because of the Western Digital Raptors. These drives rival many of the best SCSI devices in overall performance and, in some cases, actually outperform them. This is fairly impressive considering the price tag that is commonly associated with SCSI drives. Unfortunately, with this heightened level of performance comes a heightened price tag. Raptors cannot be had yet for even as low as $1 per gigabyte and the price hasn't really trailed off much since their launch. If performance is of utmost importance, a 74GB Raptor is definitely a great choice, albeit somewhat costly.

Western Digital U150 74GB 10000 8MB 120 Day Analysis

Outside of Raptors, Maxtor also has what appears to be their performance line-up of SATA drives, which sport a 16MB cache. While this does help, and the price is not overly steep for this feature, we have heard of some people having issues with the drives. Most reports appear to be heat related, but nothing that appears to cause any actual problem. (If you have these drives, let us know about your experiences - good, bad, or mixed.)

Right now, the best value in SATA lies in your basic, run-of-the-mill 8MB, 7200RPM models. One drive worth looking at is the Samsung U150 160GB 7200RPM 8MB. Feedback from current owners of this drive seems to be a sea of positives as customers point out the very low noise and heat output as positives, and the 3-year warranty is definitely welcome when most drives are lucky to come with a single year (of warranty).

Samsung U150 160GB 7200RPM 8MB 120 Day Analysis


Hard Drives: Parallel ATA Hard Drives: SCSI
Comments Locked

8 Comments

View All Comments

  • bofkentucky - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    I was pointing out an obvious error in the price guide, not commenting on your high performance SATA rant. And kogase is right, everyone else has a lucrative SCSI market to protect. WD needs a more dense solution tough, 74GB is getting tight in an age of HomePVR's and HD Video.
  • Gnoad - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    and that would be a scsi drive, which doesn't interest the normal consumer too much. I was talking about sata drives.
  • bofkentucky - Monday, November 8, 2004 - link

    Seagate Ultra320 146GB 10000RPM 8MB for 159.99

    I don't think so
  • Live - Sunday, November 7, 2004 - link

    The Samsung drive exists in 2 versions one with a very good motor with low noise and heat as a result. But lately the have started to use a different and louder motor on at least some of there drives. They are named the same so no way telling the differences by the name of the drive you have to check the actual printing on the drive.
  • mongoosesRawesome - Sunday, November 7, 2004 - link

    No mention of the fact that SATA drives can limit your OC. That would be my main reason to stay with PATA. I wouldn't mind seeing this phenomenon investigated in an article...
  • drifter106 - Sunday, November 7, 2004 - link

  • kogase - Saturday, November 6, 2004 - link

    I think it has something to do with the fact that those companies have high performance SCSI lines, and don't want to throw away their investment in that field with a similar performing SATA drive.
  • Gnoad - Saturday, November 6, 2004 - link

    Very good article. It seems nobody is really trying to compete with the Raptor drives. Maxtor tried with 16mb cache, but what we really need is more 10k drives. I figured we would be seeing other drives like the raptors within months after they were released. Why aren't seagate, maxtor, samsung going with 10k drives? Are they just giving the high end market to WD?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now