Cooling

The main difference between the CS888CL and the CS888UV is the number of 80mm fans included. The CS888CL had 5 total fans: one at the front, one at the back, two on the side panel, and that extra fan at the top of the case, which interfered with our OCZ power supply. The CS888UV has removed the top fan altogether, bringing the total down to four 80mm fans, still at their original locations.




Click to enlarge.


We could call this change an improvement, since the fan was an issue while attempting to install our equipment. Alternatively, however, Logisys could have increased the size of the front or back intake fans to 90mm, or even 120mm, to make up for that lost airflow.




Click to enlarge.


In any case, any addition to the cooling system would have been a plus on the airflow side, but would have been a bigger hit to the noise factor. The side panel fans produced so much noise that we decided to unplug them for a while.




Click to enlarge.


Another thing that we noticed about the fans - probably the most essential part missing from this sample model - was that they were not LED fans. They were the plain, UV reflective, type fans. For this reason, we could not test the UV reflectivity of the case and be amazed at the pretty glow that it would produce.

Internal Design Construction
Comments Locked

17 Comments

View All Comments

  • Zepper - Monday, November 29, 2004 - link

    Clear cases are only for store and show displays - they have little or no EMI/RFI containment/rejection.
    .bh.
  • The Beave - Sunday, November 7, 2004 - link

    #7, I agree. And who reviews a UV reflective case and doesn't shine a UV light on it to see how it looks? I don't care if the manufacturer didn't include one, it's the main reason anyone would buy this case in the fist place, and the reviewer didn't even try to do it. One of the worst hardware reviews I've EVER read.
  • KristopherKubicki - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link

    WooDaddy: Dont forget Lian Li either.

    Kristopher
  • SMT - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link

    That's gotta be the most impractical case design ever. This case is to computers what the Peavey Dan Armstrong is to guitars.
  • stephenbrooks - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link

    Well... This case is clearly for novelty value and is probably not designed with competing with the best technically spec'd metal cases in mind. I think it achieves what it's supposed to do pretty well - kind of a cross between a PC and a lavalamp-like glowy room oddity.
  • Slik - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link

    meh, I don't like where the fans are placed on this case; but Acrylic cases in general are great looking if you set them up properly.
    I also wouldn't expect an acrylic case to crack on you, If you manage to crack it then you're already handling your computer case way too rough.
    Its a matter of personal preference, like steel and aluminum there are good looking cases and ugly cases; This being one of those ugly cases. :)
  • LoneWolf15 - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link

    The side fan design is simply horrible. It maximizes cable clutter, for one. Mounting two side fans in the middle? It doesn't take an engineer to understand that it would make a lot more sense to put one fan over the CPU area where it gets hottest, and one fan in a top blowhole as hot air rises to the top of the case. Routing cables for these would also be far cleaner. Logisys also had enough space to make front and rear 120mm fan mounts, and blew it. Just as much airflow with less noise, and less power consumption.
  • michael2k - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link

    #5
    But if Macs were half as good as PCs, Apple would have to lower their prices accordingly :P
  • WooDaddy - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link

    #1 Agreed...

    It looks like the only company to really come out with Apple like designs is SilverstoneTek. We should make a thread tracking the coolest (not by temperature) cases that break the norm for PC cases... including the demon/transformer/car looking cases. I'm a 28 dude and I don't want my case looking like a fisher-price, mattel reject.
  • bldckstark - Friday, November 5, 2004 - link

    Jeez. Leave the mechanical design to the mechanical guys. I am almost positive that the reason they have 10 screws in the panel is to minimize thermal distortion of the acrylic at operating temps. If they had used 4, you would have complained about the gaps and warpage (and EMI leakage) that occurred every time the case heated up. Also, no one wants to use the red washers I agree, but the washers are there to minimize the probability of cracking and to help with vibration and sound issues. These are all valid reasons NOT to buy an acrylic case, but not reasons to rip on them either. I've seen better $35 cases than this one.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now