Battery Life

Lenovo has fitted a 60 Wh battery into the thin and light Yoga C930, which is a good-sized battery for a notebook such as this. Our review unit is also fitted with the 1920x1080 display, which is rated for much higher battery life thanks to the less-intense backlighting needs.

To test battery life, we run several tests. The 2013 Light test opens just four web pages per minute, which isn’t much work for a modern notebook. Our 2016 Web test is much more demanding and usually sees a significant reduction in battery life as a result. Finally, we test movie playback time from a local video. All of our battery life testing is at 200 nits brightness.

2013 Light

Battery Life 2013 - Light

At over 10.5 hours of battery life, the Yoga C930 did very well on this test. It’s not class-leading, but it still holds its own.

2016 Web

Battery Life 2016 - Web - Normalized

Here the Yoga improves against the competition, closing the gap to the Huawei significantly, and providing almost 9.5 hours of runtime on this much more demanding test.

Movie Playback

Battery Life Movie Playback

Likely thanks to a low-powered display, the Lenovo Yoga C930 sets a new record on movie playback, providing over 15.5 hours of movie playback. This test is where the Intel CPU really shines, since all of the media decode is offloaded to fixed function hardware that allows the rest of the CPU to sleep, and the runtimes prove how effective this is.

Battery Life Tesseract

Our Tesseract score divides the movie playback by the length of a long movie, to give you an idea how many movies you could watch before needing to charge. I hope you brought the popcorn.

Normalized Results

Battery Life 2013 - Light Normalized

Battery Life 2016 - Web - Normalized

By removing the battery capacity from the results, we can look at how efficient each device is. The Yoga C930 is helped out with the larger battery, supressing some slightly higher power draw than something like a Surface Pro 6.

Battery Summary

With a good-sized battery at 60 Wh, and good efficiency, the Lenovo Yoga C930 offers excellent battery life. In most cases, it’s not class-leading, but the usable battery time is still quite strong. The 1920x1080 display helps here though, and the optional 3840x2160 version would definitely cut into these efficiency results.

Charge Time

One area where Lenovo tends to do much better than the competition is in battery charge time. The Yoga C930 ships with a 65-Watt AC Adapter, with a USB-C connector making it pretty universal these days, and the proper way to charge an Ultrabook in 2019.

Battery Charge Time

As usually, Lenovo offers a bit more of the power to flow to the battery than most, which shortens the charge time nicely.

Display Analysis Wireless, Audio, Thermals, and Software
Comments Locked

32 Comments

View All Comments

  • Vitor - Friday, March 1, 2019 - link

    Wow, another dismal ips display. Better go TN for such awful results.
  • Death666Angel - Friday, March 1, 2019 - link

    Still better viewing angles for IPS. I've also seen 400:1 contrast ratio even on 1080p TN panels for laptops. Unless you are a hardcore, professional gamer, TN is never worth it.
  • Frenetic Pony - Friday, March 1, 2019 - link

    It isn't worth it even then. My Samsung CHG27 is great, and it's a VA panel. You really don't need TN at all today.
  • Beaver M. - Friday, March 8, 2019 - link

    While I think VA is the worst panel technology, you are right. TN really doesnt give you much more advantage. Fast IPS displays nowadays are fast enough with their 4-5 ms. And the real important thing for gamers is the input lag, not the response time.
  • qlum - Friday, March 1, 2019 - link

    Firstly lenovo's tn panels are certainly no better. Secondly tn and touch screens are not a great match. Just try pressing on a tn panel and yiu will know.
  • andy o - Friday, March 1, 2019 - link

    The 9260 has Bluetooth 5 according to Intel: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/w...
  • jeremyshaw - Friday, March 1, 2019 - link

    Lenovo typically makes the disclaimer in their spec sheets: HW supports BT5.0, Windows only supports BT4.1 (or something like that).
  • dirtperson - Thursday, March 14, 2019 - link

    Windows has supported BT5.0 since 1803 update
  • abufrejoval - Friday, March 1, 2019 - link

    Up to the point where he looked at the screen, I would have thought the author had found the love of his life: Superlatives beyond anything I had ever seen here before...

    But at €1800 for the 8/256GB variant and €2300 for the 16/512GB+4K screen I CHUWI over alternatives...

    These things can be mass produced and sold at $800, now that those insane flash and RAM prices are coming back down and Intel is facing competition.
  • Irata - Friday, March 1, 2019 - link

    Unfortunately, Intel's competition is most often not put in a premium chassis and delivered with a sub par configuration with few configuration choices but still at the same price as the Intel counterpart - with the rare exception.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now