The ASRock Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac Review

Test Bed and Setup

Readers of our motherboard review section will have noted the trend in modern motherboards to implement a form of MultiCore Enhancement / Acceleration / Turbo (read our report here) on their motherboards. This does several things, including better benchmark results at stock settings (not entirely needed if overclocking is an end-user goal) at the expense of heat and temperature. It also gives, in essence, an automatic overclock which may be against what the user wants. Our testing methodology is ‘out-of-the-box’, with the latest public BIOS installed and XMP enabled, and thus subject to the whims of this feature. It is ultimately up to the motherboard manufacturer to take this risk – and manufacturers taking risks in the setup is something they do on every product (think C-state settings, USB priority, DPC Latency/monitoring priority, overriding memory sub-timings at JEDEC). Processor speed change is part of that risk, and ultimately if no overclocking is planned, some motherboards will affect how fast that shiny new processor goes and can be an important factor in the system build.

The ASRock Z270 Gaming-ITX/ac is one of the few motherboards that we have reviewed recently that has multi-core acceleration disabled by default. The FCLK frequency is set to 800 MHz by default as well and all current/temperature limiters are enabled and set to their default settings.

Test Setup
Processor Intel Core i7-7700K (ES, Retail Stepping), 91W, $340
4 Cores, 8 Threads, 4.2 GHz (4.5 GHz Turbo)
Motherboards ECS Z270H4-I Durathon 2
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 240
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i Platinum PSU
Memory G.Skill DDR4-2400 C15 2x16 GB 1.2V
Memory Settings XMP @ 2400
Video Cards MSI GTX 770 Lightning 2GB (1150/1202 Boost)
Hard Drive Crucial MX200 1TB
Case Open Test Bed
Operating System Windows 7 64-bit SP1

Thank you to Crucial for providing us with MX200 SSDs. Crucial stepped up to the plate as our benchmark list grows larger with newer benchmarks and titles, and the 1TB MX200 units are strong performers. Based on Marvell's 88SS9189 controller and using Micron's 16nm 128Gbit MLC flash, these are 7mm high, 2.5-inch drives rated for 100K random read IOPs and 555/500 MB/s sequential read and write speeds. The 1TB models we are using here support TCG Opal 2.0 and IEEE-1667 (eDrive) encryption and have a 320TB rated endurance with a three-year warranty.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Crucial MX200 (250 GB, 500 GB & 1TB) Review

Thank you to Corsair for providing us with an AX1200i PSU. The AX1200i was the first power supply to offer digital control and management via Corsair's Link system, but under the hood it commands a 1200W rating at 50C with 80 PLUS Platinum certification. This allows for a minimum 89-92% efficiency at 115V and 90-94% at 230V. The AX1200i is completely modular, running the larger 200mm design, with a dual ball bearing 140mm fan to assist high-performance use. The AX1200i is designed to be a workhorse, with up to 8 PCIe connectors for suitable four-way GPU setups. The AX1200i also comes with a Zero RPM mode for the fan, which due to the design allows the fan to be switched off when the power supply is under 30% load.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Corsair AX1500i Power Supply Review

Thank you to G.Skill for providing us with memory. G.Skill has been a long-time supporter of AnandTech over the years, for testing beyond our CPU and motherboard memory reviews. We've reported on their high capacity and high-frequency kits, and every year at Computex G.Skill holds a world overclocking tournament with liquid nitrogen right on the show floor.

Further Reading: AnandTech's Memory Scaling on Haswell Review, with G.Skill DDR3-3000

Board Features and Overclocking BIOS
Comments Locked

41 Comments

View All Comments

  • jjj - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    6 months after launch and AT is yet to review a single Ryzen mobo.
  • nathanddrews - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    You should buy some and send them to AT.
  • sonny73n - Wednesday, September 20, 2017 - link

    "You should buy some and send them to AT."

    Without AT's permission or agreement to do a review? Or are you just being a foul mouth?
  • Oxford Guy - Monday, September 25, 2017 - link

    How about buying Asrock one of its 170 boards so it can fix the BIOS for it with the code Intel gave them in April.

    But, hey — who needs to worry about random crash bugs from a hyperthreading flaw?
  • Gavin Bonshor - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    You can expect a wave of them coming very soon :)
  • Ian Cutress - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    We've had zero dedicated motherboard reviewers at AT for most of the year, as I'm spending all my time on CPU testing (or perhaps you'd want me to forgo the CPU tests?). I've been building a team in the interim to take care of MB review duties. Should be in full swing from about this point on.
  • jjj - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    Interesting attitude and misleading statement.

    You had 4 mobo reviews after the Ryzen launch , staff or no staff and it's statistically significant that none is for a Ryzen mobo. If you add context like interest in the product, value offered, it becomes more than odd.
    What's the cause, that's for you to figure out and adjust but that seems unlikely given your attitude. - "or perhaps you'd want me to forgo the CPU tests?)"

    In the end, you lose money by not serving the market.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    All by a single reviewer - who also does all the case, PSU, and keyboard reviews too and thus has limited free time available - and on a single platform. The latter is because as a distributed team Anandtech doesn't have a single office to store all their stuff. Each reviewer needs his/her own set of parts to test with; and for consistency the same parts (particularly the CPU for OCing) need to be the same for everything done on the platform. To avoid spending large amounts on shipping and customs fees that means any part time mobo reviewers are probably only going to have a single platform. E. Fylladitakis is doing Z270. One or more of the newbies is working on Ryzen.

    There was a tweet a few days ago (don't recall if from Ian or Ryan) about having gotten 5 submissions from the new mobo reviewers that need edited. Since we haven't seen anything except the x399 overview article on the subject from a newish Author (Joe Shields started in July) they're presumably all still being revised to site standards. I'd imagine at least some of the Ryzen mobo reviews you're looking for are coming soon.
  • Gothmoth - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    since anand is gone it´s spiraling down the drain
  • realistz - Tuesday, September 19, 2017 - link

    Forum is a mess too. It's run by pro-AMD mods.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now