Gigabyte 7VAXP-A Ultra: The KT400A in Retail Action

Gaming Performance (continued...)

Gaming Performance Unreal Tournament 2003 Demo - Flyby 1024x768 ASUS A7N8X Deluxe (nForce2-Dual Channel DDR333) Gigabyte 7VAXP-A Ultra (KT400A-Single Channel DDR400) ASUS A7N8X Deluxe (nForce2-Single Channel DDR333) Gigabyte 7VAXP Ultra (KT400-Single Channel DDR400) 174.61 173.11 172.91 167.81 | 0 | 35 | 70 | 105 | 140 | 175 | 21

Gaming Performance Unreal Tournament 2003 Demo - Botmatch 1024x768 ASUS A7N8X Deluxe (nForce2-Dual Channel DDR333) ASUS A7N8X Deluxe (nForce2-Single Channel DDR333) Gigabyte 7VAXP-A Ultra (KT400A-Single Channel DDR400) Gigabyte 7VAXP Ultra (KT400-Single Channel DDR400) 70.92 69.12 68.46 63.68 | 0 | 14 | 28 | 43 | 57 | 71 | 85

Unreal Tournament 2003 shows similar results to our previous gaming benchmarks, just less dramatic. The largest gain the A7N8X Deluxe can claim over the 7VAXP-A Ultra is 2.46 fps, or 3.5%.

So far it's quite clear that the nForce2-based ASUS A7N8X Deluxe is the better gaming motherboard than the KT400A-based Gigabyte 7VAXP-A Ultra.