Design

Samsung transitioned its Galaxy lineup to “premium” materials—glass and metal—last year, a trend many OEMs are following as they try to improve the perception of quality and luxury for their high-end and mid-range devices. LG, however, stuck with plastic for the G4; its only concession a series of optional leather-clad back covers. Despite being known for making plastic phones, LG is no stranger to metal: The G4 incorporated a metal alloy midframe to improve stiffness, and the sides of the V10 were stainless steel.

But the G5 is a radical departure from previous LG models in both material and design. Its (nearly) all-aluminum, unibody construction is a first for LG, and its iconic rear-mounted buttons are gone. It manages to be both completely new and totally familiar, ultimately transformed and regrettably unoriginal. Observing one important distinction, however, collapses this dichotomy into a unique state: This metal phone has a removable battery.

A removable back that allows easy access to the phone’s battery is a clear advantage for plastic construction. This approach is no longer possible with a unibody design, which, up until now, sealed the battery within a secure vault. LG’s novel solution approaches this issue from a different angle—specifically from the bottom rather than the back.

The portion of the phone below the screen separates after pushing a small button that sits flush with the left side to prevent accidental release. After rocking it back and forth a few times and giving it a good tug, the lower chin section and battery assembly slide out freely. Separating the battery and chin section causes some anxiety because it requires a fair amount of prying force, and the two hooks on the bottom of the battery, which lock the pieces together, are made of plastic. The chin section is mostly aluminum, but the front plate that includes the LG logo is plastic, as is the piece that holds onto the battery. I’m not convinced that this all-plastic attachment scheme for the battery will not wear out over time. If it does, it should not affect the function of the phone—the battery will still be held firmly in place once fully assembled—but will make removing and inserting the battery a bit trickier.

Combining an easily swappable battery with an aluminum unibody design is the G5’s defining feature and LG gets it mostly right. Besides my concern about battery retention mentioned above, I would like to see a rubber gasket incorporated into the chin section. Even though there’s a tight fit between it and the inside of the phone body, water could still find its way inside the phone. However, the catch that secures the chin section is made from metal and interfaces directly with the phone’s aluminum housing, which is a plus for durability. Also, considering this is a mass-produced, cost-sensitive device, LG does a decent job controlling manufacturing tolerances, minimizing the seam between the two pieces.

This design also enables an interesting possibility: modularity. The basic idea is to swap the G5’s chin section for a module that adds some new functionality. The first two modules include the LG CAM Plus (shown above), which gives the G5 a point-and-shoot form factor by adding a hand grip with dedicated shutter and video recording buttons and a wheel for controlling the digital zoom as well as 1200mAh of additional battery capacity, and the LG Hi-Fi Plus with B&O PLAY, which includes a 32-bit Hi-Fi DAC supporting 32-bit 384KHz HD audio playback. Neither is particularly compelling—Is carrying around an extra camera module that provides a better grip and some extra runtime any better than carrying around a small point-and-shoot camera that can take better pictures?—but LG’s HDK and SDK opens up the G5 to third-party modules; however, it seems unlikely that many companies will invest the resources to develop modules that will only work with one phone that’s unlikely to see the sales volume of an iPhone or Galaxy device. LG’s modular phone concept might take off, but we would not recommend buying the G5 on the hope that additional modules will materialize in the future. It’s also worth mentioning that swapping modules means removing the battery, resulting in a small time penalty as the phone reboots after snapping in the new module.

A more obvious, if less groundbreaking, change is the G5’s new, smaller screen. At 5.3-inches it’s only slightly smaller than the G4’s 5.5-inch unit but trims 2.2mm off the width, making it easier for your thumb to reach the opposite edge of the screen. Because of a larger upper bezel, the G5 is an imperceptible 0.5mm taller, giving it a tall, thin silhouette. Even though it’s less chunky than the G4, the G5’s frontal area (149.4 x 73.9 mm) is noticeably larger than the 5.1-inch Galaxy S7 (142.4 x 69.6 mm) and 5.2-inch HTC 10 (145.9 x 71.9 mm) and nearly the same as the 5.5-inch Galaxy S7 edge (150.9 x 72.6 mm).

The G4’s sharper corners tend to dig into the palm of the hand. LG addresses this issue by giving the G5’s corners a larger radius, which makes the G5 much more comfortable to hold. The rounder corners also make it easier to reach more of the screen; it’s still not possible to reach the top without changing your grip, though, so the G5 still requires two hands sometimes.

Unlike the iPhone 6s or several other devices we’ve seen recently, the G5 does not use 2.5D glass on the front. Instead, the G5 uses LG’s 3D Arc Glass that adds a large curve only along the top edge. At first this seemed like a superfluous design flourish. Curved sides make edge swipes feel smooth, but your thumb rarely swipes down from the very top edge. It was not until I made a phone call that I realized the utility of this curve: It makes the phone very comfortable to hold against your ear. The same is true for 2.5D glass as well, but the G5’s larger, more gentle curve rests more naturally against the ear, making it easier to position the earpiece correctly. It’s a design element that I’ve come to really appreciate.

The 3.5mm headphone jack migrates from the bottom of the G4 to the top of the G5. There’s also an IR blaster and a noise cancelling microphone. A USB Type-C port is centered on the bottom edge, flanked by another microphone and the single, mono speaker.

The sides of the G5 are slightly tapered and rounded, which improves grip compared to the perfectly rounded sides on the iPhone 6s. At the bottom of the left edge is the aforementioned flush-mounted button to release the lower chin section along with a single-piece volume rocker closer to the top. The volume rocker is held firmly in place so it does not rattle, and, because it’s nearly flush with the side, it’s difficult to press accidentally. There are no controls on the right edge, just a combo tray for the Nano SIM and microSD cards, which sit side by side.

Instead of a curved back like the G4, the back of the G5’s unibody is flat, which makes it easier to use when it’s resting on a table. The back edges are slightly curved, similar to the Galaxy S7 edge, improving the in-hand feel. A polished ring around the perimeter adds a touch of flair, but the most prominent feature around back is the slightly raised, pill-shaped camera unit. Sitting between the two different camera lenses are the LED flash, color spectrum sensor, and laser autofocus module. Just below the camera unit is a circular touch-based fingerprint sensor that pulls double duty as a clickable power button. It's also slightly raised, which makes it easier to locate, and makes a solid click when pressed. Both the camera unit and power button are wrapped with a generous radius, blending them into the body and contributing to the phone’s smooth, rounded appearance.

One thing we do not see on the back are plastic antenna lines, which LG hid below the surface in a somewhat controversial manner. While the G5’s unibody is made from an aluminum alloy called LM201, some consumers are upset that their fingers never actually touch the metal. In order to hide the antenna lines, which are applied to the exterior of the aluminum case, the phone is coated with a gray primer and then painted with a pigment containing small metal particles in a process LG calls “microdizing.” This finish is quite convincing and looks very nice. Other than the plastic insert on the front of the chin section, the G5 is an all-aluminum phone, and to label it anything else based on the finish applied is rubbish. A car’s metal body panels are coated with primer and paint, but we do not say the car is made from plastic or that its body is not all-metal (although, most modern cars include body panels made entirely from plastic or composite materials so this might not be the best analogy). Our only concern about the G5’s painted finish is durability; will the paint scratch off easily? We have yet to drop or otherwise abuse our review units, so we cannot say.

The G5’s microdizing finish comes in four different colors: Silver, Titan, Gold, Pink. The image at the top of this page shows our Titan (gray) review unit next to the lighter Silver color, while the image below shows the (ubiquitous) Gold and Pink options. Some colors are not available in all markets or through all carriers. In the U.S., for example, both AT&T and Sprint offer all four colors, T-Mobile offers Silver and Gold, and Verizon offers Silver and Titan. The G5 is also available from the major Canadian carriers but apparently not in the Gold color.

I think the G5 is a decent looking phone; it’s not as flashy as the S7 nor as distinct as LG’s G4, but its smooth appearance has grown more appealing over time. Its most distinguishing feature is the dual camera unit on the back. While walking around a touristy spot in Shanghai randomly taking pictures, one local man knelt down on the ground in front of me just to see what phone I was using. Apparently the dual camera caught his eye.

Introduction Software: LG UX 5.0
POST A COMMENT

92 Comments

View All Comments

  • osxandwindows - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    finally!. Reply
  • zeeBomb - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    Damn... This review surprised me! Still won't get it, but nice to have itv finally done Reply
  • Alexey291 - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    As usual their reviews are so late that the devices of the current generation have been bought already by those who was planning to buy them.

    Unless it's an iPhone ofc. That shit gets a review in a week
    Reply
  • tuxRoller - Thursday, May 26, 2016 - link

    First, that's probably an exaggeration.
    Second, there are only a couple of iphone launches every year, at most. That's a much easier load to track compared to the swarm of android devices that dribble out over the year (with a plurality released around March, tbh).
    Reply
  • marcolorenzo - Sunday, May 29, 2016 - link

    So what? Why does it matter how many Android devices there are compared to iPhones? The OS has nothing to do with reviewing a phone, that kind of segregation makes absolutely no logical sense. Of course, during this period when several manufacturers decide to release their phones at the same time, the workload of reviewers would suddenly spike but it still doesn't excuse the delays they have during other times of the year. Let's just face facts. IPhones, like sex, sells. Of course they would double down and getting a review of the latest iPhones out the door, they get more viewers that way. Reply
  • tuxRoller - Sunday, May 29, 2016 - link

    It matters because the person I responded to mentioned how iPhone reviews come out relatively quickly. I responded by explaining my understanding of the situation, which is that phones are, in a practical sense, categorized by their OS. Specifically with regards to apple, they are there only ones who produce ios phones, and only make, at most, a couple of releases a year. What's more, those particular phones are the most purchased of any particular phone so interest is highest in them.
    For Android, the sales distribution is far more diffuse, and Samsung, for one, has at least a couple major releases every year.
    When you have a finite amount of man power you have to distribute it in a way that provides the most benefits.
    As for their delays during other times, there were, iirc, mitigating circumstances(reviewers were sick, schoolwork, etc). If you have actual knowledge that indicates otherwise I'd be interested.
    Reply
  • anoxy - Monday, May 30, 2016 - link

    Wait, are you really that dense? You answered your own question but you're still throwing a hissyfit?

    More phone releases = more workload = increased delays in using (adequately) and reviewing every phone.

    There are usually two iPhones, and they likely receive review units well in advance and thus have plenty of time to use them. And yes, there is a greater incentive to review an insanely popular device like the iPhone. Why does that upset you?
    Reply
  • Ranger1065 - Friday, May 27, 2016 - link

    Nicely written article, but even, "better late than never" barely applies. Anandtech takes another GIANT step, towards obsolescence... Reply
  • Alex J. - Friday, May 27, 2016 - link

    I agree, it's pretty disappointing how more and more "late" all of their reviews are becoming... At this rate, the HTC10 review would probably come at the end of the summer.

    And yea, "better late than never" phrase is also losing its relevancy - most of the people whom I personally know and who were planning to "upgrade" their Android phones this year have already done so, meaning the "late" reviews like this have lost all relevance to them. But whatever - if Purch Media wants to run Anandtech into the ground - it's their choice.
    Reply
  • DiamondsWithaZ - Monday, September 19, 2016 - link

    It did haha. The HTC 10 review literally just got posted... The phone has been out for almost 6 months. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now