SSD 2018 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

Browse SSD18 Benchmarks

View Benchmark Results

SSD18 Product Benchmarks

Bench Results

  Samsung 970 PRO 1TB - Samsung Phoenix - Samsung 256Gb 64L MLC

  WD Black SN750 1TB - SanDisk 20-82-007011 - SanDisk 256Gb 64L TLC

Product Ratings & Comparisons

Idle Power Consumption - Laptop
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
5
2
Idle Power Consumption - Desktop
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
72
852
Idle Power Consumption - No PM
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
592
1146
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
267
1877
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
483
584
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
60
2124
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
54.2
137.64
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
71.05
93.09
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
33.7
191.83
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
982.18
746.69
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
2.56
1.34
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
170
431
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
339
550
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
64
69
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
44.35
54.92
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
56.6
75.59
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
34.43
38.17
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1573.18
1272.99
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1
0.51
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
683
1123
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
696
863
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
357
3205
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
72.03
174.84
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
71.89
100.22
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
72.52
438.7
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1261.24
918.12
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
17.88
9.68
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1664
1659
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
53.12
52.51
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1450
1431
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1217
1213
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1506
1456
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2098.1
1610.4
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2558.2
2241.5
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
69.5
46.2
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
312.5
404
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
1678.6
1611.5
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
417.67
489.5
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
420.4
338.3
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
141.49
174.17
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2945.7
1586.3
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
645.13
551.43
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2226.2
1737.1
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
433.18
409.01
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
139.4
90.9
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
53.99
65.06
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
622.9
633.9
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
193.09
241.66

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now