SSD 2018 Benchmarks

BENCH Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking on product categories below!

Browse SSD18 Benchmarks

View Benchmark Results

SSD18 Product Benchmarks

Bench Results

  ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB - Silicon Motion SM2262EN - Micron 256Gb 64L TLC

  WD Black SN750 1TB - SanDisk 20-82-007011 - SanDisk 256Gb 64L TLC

Product Ratings & Comparisons

Idle Power Consumption - Laptop
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
3
2
Idle Power Consumption - Desktop
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
10
852
Idle Power Consumption - No PM
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
713
1146
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
385
1877
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
384
584
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
387
2124
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
71.29
137.64
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
78.81
93.09
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
62.15
191.83
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
906.01
746.69
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1.56
1.34
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
177
431
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
351
550
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
80
69
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
49.99
54.92
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
63.49
75.59
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
39.05
38.17
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1465.77
1272.99
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
0.55
0.51
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3974
1123
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2364
863
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
18742
3205
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
327.6
174.84
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
212.18
100.22
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
735.76
438.7
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
645.76
918.12
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
14.23
9.68
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1663
1659
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
51.78
52.51
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1446
1431
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1216
1213
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1494
1456
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2576.7
1610.4
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2499.8
2241.5
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
89.2
46.2
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
461.6
404
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
1575.5
1611.5
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
439.16
489.5
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
393.7
338.3
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
163.12
174.17
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2766.3
1586.3
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
631.39
551.43
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2420.7
1737.1
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
485.06
409.01
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
167.3
90.9
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
82.58
65.06
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
610.9
633.9
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
243.44
241.66

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now