SSD 2018 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 1TB - Silicon Motion SM2262EN - Micron 256Gb 64L TLC
Corsair Force Series MP510 960GB - Phison E12 - Toshiba 256Gb 64L TLC
Corsair Force Series MP510 960GB - Phison E12 - Toshiba 256Gb 64L TLC
Product Ratings & Comparisons
Idle Power Consumption - Laptop
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
3
2
Idle Power Consumption - Desktop
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
10
48
Idle Power Consumption - No PM
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
713
416
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
385
1530
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
384
543
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
387
2154
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
71.29
106.22
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
78.81
110.38
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
62.15
101.16
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
906.01
681.84
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1.56
1.64
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
177
288
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
351
396
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
80
59
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
49.99
54.34
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
63.49
77.19
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
39.05
35.82
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1465.77
1273.02
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
0.55
0.6
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3974
1154
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2364
1084
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
18742
1385
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
327.6
131.09
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
212.18
137.17
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
735.76
109.61
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
645.76
811.64
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
14.23
12.24
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1663
1662
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
51.78
52.62
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1446
1435
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1216
1214
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1494
1466
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2576.7
1965.6
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2499.8
2648.7
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
89.2
59.3
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
461.6
476
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
1575.5
1516
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
439.16
458.26
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
393.7
271.4
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
163.12
121.88
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2766.3
1681.3
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
631.39
515.64
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2420.7
1737.5
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
485.06
420.65
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
167.3
87.5
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
82.58
51.15
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
610.9
598.4
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
243.44
182.27
(Obsolete) Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
714
550
(Obsolete) Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
11
49
(Obsolete) Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better
Microseconds - Lower is Better
62599
1878
Facebook
Twitter
RSS