SSD 2018 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Crucial MX500 1TB
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
Product Ratings & Comparisons
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
7131
33828
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3324
7060
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
7523.54
41071.54
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
804.47
1751.39
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
344.16
492.25
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1364.25
3282.66
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
245.85
149.22
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1.34
1.84
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3071
2873
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2751
2319.13
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3143.92
3006
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
385.53
314.76
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
433.61
299.78
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
346.56
326.9
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
262.6
344.27
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
0.46
0.55
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
7336
31965
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
5897
19401
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
13226
61206.83
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1023.73
4304.95
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
478.15
901.99
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2952.99
16338.41
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
329.04
173.44
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
10.7
16.42
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1656
1652
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
50.19
50.07
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1407
1396
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1207
1200
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1393
1373
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
428.7
368.8
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
426
420.2
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
40.5
25.3
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
114.9
127.9
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
349.3
277.2
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
181.93
155.48
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
148.7
127.5
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
97.39
81.05
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
485.7
478.2
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
233.62
258.14
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
420
159
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
187.18
78.39
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
70
41.2
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
53.06
29.77
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
205
125.5
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
132.75
66.77
(Obsolete) Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
545
1966
(Obsolete) Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
101
33
(Obsolete) Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better
Microseconds - Lower is Better
4118
1056
Facebook
Twitter
RSS