SSD 2018 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Intel SSD 545s 512GB
Intel SSD 660p 1TB - Silicon Motion SM2263 - Intel 1Tb 64L QLC
Intel SSD 660p 1TB - Silicon Motion SM2263 - Intel 1Tb 64L QLC
Product Ratings & Comparisons
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
7702
1900
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3327
845
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
8463
2118
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
821.94
198.41
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
329.8
110.43
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1420.45
305.41
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
236.27
711.17
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1.29
1.56
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3112
740
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2895
690.71
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3165
761
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
407.86
86.79
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
367.9
95.63
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
440.25
79.62
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
292.43
1101.7
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
0.44
0.56
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
9635
22911
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
6736
14869
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
28347
41457.83
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1201.35
1872.57
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
543.55
394.31
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3527.46
7099.95
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
296.11
303.94
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
10.13
14.61
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1659
1660
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
49.7
52.87
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1425
1436
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1210
1215
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1440
1469
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
450.1
1399.1
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
378
1674
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
35.4
72.4
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
116.3
334.8
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
366.6
799.9
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
192.39
309.98
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
167.9
205.8
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
107.43
96.47
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
480.6
1547.8
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
313
510.31
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
391.7
1523.7
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
140.41
439.36
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
71.2
125.4
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
60.49
62.03
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
198
414.1
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
105.01
190.37
(Obsolete) Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
448
667
(Obsolete) Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
52
10
(Obsolete) Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better
Microseconds - Lower is Better
1506
55698
Facebook
Twitter
RSS