SSD 2018 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Samsung 970 EVO 1TB - Samsung Phoenix - Samsung 256Gb 64L TLC
WD Blue 1TB 3D NAND
WD Blue 1TB 3D NAND
Product Ratings & Comparisons
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2739
6772
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
3891
3181.08
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
1603.54
7126
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
123.43
715.05
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
146.79
324.04
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
95.01
1190.56
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
537.25
263.6
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
2.74
1.27
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
172
2970
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
319
2709
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
72
3048
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
46.48
320.94
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
59.02
319.08
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
36.32
322.46
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1494.85
340.07
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
1.03
0.43
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2448
6631
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2424
5444
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
2654
10928
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
214.03
992.25
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
119.29
474.05
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better
549.05
2824.7
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
846.78
302.92
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better
19.48
10.63
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1663
1655
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better
54.07
50.19
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1440
1409
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1214
1203
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better
1478
1405
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
1965.2
451.5
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
2471
438.5
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
52.9
42.1
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better
297.7
121.3
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
1656.8
390.6
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
370.06
181.16
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better
379.3
130.4
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
123.66
78.61
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2338
500.2
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
486.76
219.67
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
2127.7
423.2
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
372.8
142.57
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
104
80.2
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
39.51
57.04
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better
589.5
179
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better
175.09
94.54
(Obsolete) Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
1416
405
(Obsolete) Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
72
64
(Obsolete) Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better
Microseconds - Lower is Better
13914
233
Facebook
Twitter
RSS