SSD 2018 Benchmarks
BENCH
Bench gives you access to our internal benchmark data so that you can compare the products without searching for an older review. Make reliable comparisons between products by clicking
on product categories below!
Bench Results
Intel SSD 600p 512GB
Silicon Motion SM2260 - Intel 384Gb 32L 3D TLC
Silicon Motion SM2260 - Intel 384Gb 32L 3D TLC
Product Ratings & Comparisons
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 21197
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 21197
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1736
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1736
ATSB - Heavy (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 43508
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 43508
ATSB - Heavy (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1166.25
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 1166.25
ATSB - Heavy (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 266.64
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 266.64
ATSB - Heavy (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2260.3
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2260.3
ATSB - Heavy (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 209.72
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 209.72
ATSB - Heavy (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 2.22
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 2.22
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2130
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2130
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 942
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 942
ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2673
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2673
ATSB - Light (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 196.65
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 196.65
ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 155.37
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 155.37
ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 230.11
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 230.11
ATSB - Light (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 531.73
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 531.73
ATSB - Light (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 0.59
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 0.59
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 20197
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 20197
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Read Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3163
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 3163
ATSB - The Destroyer (99th Percentile Write Latency)
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 61907.49
99th Percentile Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 61907.49
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2241.51
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 2241.51
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Read Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 440.61
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 440.61
ATSB - The Destroyer (Average Write Latency)
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 8609.83
Average Latency in Microseconds - Lower is Better 8609.83
ATSB - The Destroyer (Data Rate)
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 246.45
Average Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 246.45
ATSB - The Destroyer (Power)
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 20
Energy Consumed in Watt-Hours - Lower is Better 20
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Creativity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1660
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1660
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Energy Consumption
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better 53.28
Average of Five Runs - Lower is Better 53.28
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Overall Rating
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1426
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1426
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Productivity
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1209
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1209
BAPCo SYSmark 2018 - Responsiveness
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1444
Average of Five Runs - Higher is Better 1444
Burst 128kB Sequential Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 424.7
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 424.7
Burst 128kB Sequential Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 564.2
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 564.2
Burst 4kB Random Read (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 30.8
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 30.8
Burst 4kB Random Write (Queue Depth 1)
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 267.5
Data Rate in MB/s - Higher is Better 267.5
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 391.5
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 391.5
Mixed 128kB Sequential Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 125.02
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 125.02
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 151
Average of All Read/Write Distributions in MB/s - Higher is Better 151
Mixed 4kB Random Read/Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 56.89
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 56.89
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 726.4
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 726.4
Sustained 128kB Sequential Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 234.07
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 234.07
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 297.7
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 297.7
Sustained 128kB Sequential Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 72.68
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 72.68
Sustained 4kB Random Read
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 55.5
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 55.5
Sustained 4kB Random Read (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 24.88
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 24.88
Sustained 4kB Random Write
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 256
Average of QD1, QD2 & QD4 Data Rates in MB/s - Higher is Better 256
Sustained 4kB Random Write (Power Efficiency)
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 77.45
Power Efficiency in MB/s per Watt - Higher is Better 77.45
(Obsolete) Active Idle Power Consumption (No LPM)
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better 962
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better 962
(Obsolete) Idle Power Consumption
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
299
Power Consumption in Milliwatts - Lower is Better
SATA LPM Slumber state or NVMe Non-Operational Power State
(Obsolete) Idle Wake-Up Latency
Microseconds - Lower is Better 186561
Microseconds - Lower is Better 186561
Facebook
Twitter
RSS