Concluding Remarks

The Sony DPT-S1's feature set and pricing make it clear that business users are the primary target market. Posts on various e-reader forums indicate that the device is gaining popularity amongst academics and lawyers. Despite the business / enterprise focus, there is nothing preventing power users from using it as a standard e-reader. In fact, the device, when used in the landscape mode with a two-page thumbnail view (a feature introduced in firmware v1.5.50.1180 released on December 15, 2015), can simulate holding a real book with two pages side by side. The availability of a pen / stylus can also lend itself to some interesting applications for casual users. Writing on the plastic surface of the Sony DPT-S1 feels closer to writing on actual paper compared to glass surfaces in other tablets.


Sony DPT-S1 - Not Necessarily an 'all work, no play' Device

Even though I try to avoid printing out documents / papers and read them on a computer monitor or tablet, I can't totally avoid the usage of a printer. Since purchasing the Sony DPT-S1 a couple of weeks back, I haven't printed out a single document. One of the aims of the Sony DPT-S1 is to reduce paper clutter. I have to say that it succeeds nicely in this respect.

Coming to the business end of the review, we will analyze the pros and cons of the Sony DPT-S1 first.

On the plus side:

  • The unit is lightweight, yet solid. The experience is very similar to carrying a folder with a few sheets of paper.
  • The unit has great ergonomics and is perfectly size for technical documents
  • It is a great vehicle to bring out the advantages of E-Ink
    • No strain on the eyes, thanks to the absence of backlighting
    • Visibility under bright light / outdoor environments is perfect
    • The battery life is great - more than a couple of weeks between charges even with regular use (2 - 3 hours a day with a page or so of writing on each day)
  • Annotation capabilities with the pen input is great for note taking and other business uses.
  • It reads all PDFs - no messing around with DRM, no proprietary file formats, no 'cloud' accounts needed
  • Combination of features make it a very unique product in the market

On the other side:

  • The exorbitant pricing ($800) makes it unsuitable for personal use. There exists better value for money if an E-Ink screen is not a must
  • The PDF viewer could do with some more features to make it more versatile / suitable for non-business use-cases. (more zooming, adjustable cropping to remove white margins etc.)
  • Firmware, in general, could do with some extra features - such as providing additional options for network shares along with the currently existing WebDAV support.
  • Limitations of E-Ink
    • Low refresh rate can hamper user experience when redrawing the screen during document navigation / zooming
    • Absence of color capabilities
  • Adding audio capabilities could help expand the addressable market (targeting audiobooks, for example)
  • At the $800 price point, the presence of just 4GB (3GB usable) of internal flash is disappointing. Availability of a microSD slot alleviates this issue somewhat.
  • A more powerful processor could help in providing a better user-experience with graphics-heavy PDFs.
  • Absence of contrast adjustment (something possible in the Kindle-DX) is a bit disappointing
  • There is no built-in light for reading in the dark (something available in the Kindle Paperwhite)
  • Wear-out of the pen tips could be a worry for heavy users
  • Navigation buttons at the bottom could do with a more pronounced feel. The current design (flush with the rest of the frame) is more suitable for capacitive touch-based implementations.

Despite the list of potential improvements and drawbacks being longer than the positives, the Sony DPT-S1 gets my recommendation for being a unique product in a specific niche. Products based on the 13.3" E-Ink Mobius screen have also been shown at tradeshows by companies like Netronix and Pocketbook, but they remain vaporware.

If the characteristics of E-Ink screens fit your requirements and you need a size-for-size replacement for traditional paper documents, the Sony Digital Paper System DPT-S1 is the perfect fit. It does a surprisingly great job despite being the only such product in the market. We hope Sony continues to provide firmware updates for the product and bring the price down even further.

Software and UI Aspects
Comments Locked

109 Comments

View All Comments

  • AndrewJacksonZA - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    (Sony is not very liberal with review units unlike other manufacturers, btw)

    As someone who's a fan on Sony's quality and style, it totally baffles me why they don't give more people review units.
  • digiguy - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    Sorry Ganesh, I thought that a "featured review" was a review paid by the manufacturer. So of course, that means I misunderstood this. Please accept my apologies. Especially sorry that it happened with you. I had already said in the past on this website that you and (the now gone) Kristian Vatto were my favorite reviewers here on Anandtech (well Anand too, but he was already gone at that time). I highly appreciate that you paid this unit yourself in oder to review it. I have been researching this product since 2014 and have found very few reviews. So it was really a nice surprise to find one on AT.
  • phexac - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    Don't worry about people saying stuff like this. We greatly appreciate the initiative, the effort and the time you put into this review.

    There are always commenters on every board that claim the review must be paid for because they can't fathom someone with an opinion that differs from theirs.
  • digiguy - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    If you are referring to what I said I think you didn't read what I added... I was convinced that a featured review was a sort of a sponsored review (by the way what is a featured review?). And nowhere I said that this review wasn't welcome. On the contrary, if you had read what I posted today... So your assumption "claim the review must be paid for because they can't fathom someone with an opinion that differs from theirs" if referred to me, is completely wrong.
  • Ryan Smith - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    Just to be clear, "Featured Review" is the default subtitle in our system if we don't manually set a subtitle. And in that case, it just means it's the review we're deciding to feature today, hence the reason it's at the top of the site.

    We don't do sponsored reviews - we accept samples of things we want to review, but not any kind of payment for reviewing them. And if for any reason that changed, it's something I'd let you guys know about.
  • digiguy - Friday, December 18, 2015 - link

    Thanks a lot Ryan for clarifying that, and sorry for the misunderstanding... This is one of the things I really appreciate about this website, that the authors take the time to reply to readers and, what's more, do it quickly... I regularly follow and actively take part in several tech websites/blogs (in several languages) but yours is really one of the best if not the best in terms of both expertise and interaction with participants. And this has not changed after Anand left, nor after the takeover. Keep up the good work!
  • Tams80 - Sunday, December 20, 2015 - link

    So an iPad is best your use cases; great. Most of use aren't like you though, so maybe this Sony will be better. As you use your iPad mainly fro sheet music, I take it you don't often continuously stare at the display for any considerable length of time.

    (thats probably why Sony paid for this review)

    Ganesh as already put you down; but I suggest taking your tin-foil hat off.
  • digiguy - Sunday, December 20, 2015 - link

    Again another guy that doesn't read what's written after the first post, and writes absolute nonsense
  • digiguy - Sunday, December 20, 2015 - link

    And by the way, Ganesh only replied to a misunderstanding of what is a "featured review", without knowing I had misunderstood it. So nobody has put down anybody and the only meaningless thing here is what you wrote. Add to that, that you don't know more than anyone else what "most of use" are...
  • JoeMonco - Thursday, December 17, 2015 - link

    I used to read exclusively on an eink screen Nook. I then switched to an iPad haven't switched back because there was no difference. But as the others have said I adjusted the brightness of the screen appropriately to the room brightness.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now