Camera: Photos and Videos

The number of users that use their tablet as their primary camera is far larger than anyone ever could have predicted when the tablet market was emerging. However, there are some obvious reasons why someone would opt for their tablet. It may actually be the best camera they own, and older users with aging eyes can definitely appreciate the fact that their tablet display turns into a giant high resolution viewfinder. The cameras themselves have also improved significantly from the dark days of the 1.2MP rear camera on the iPad 2.

Since the Tab S2 is extremely thin, Samsung has needed to allow for a camera hump in order to fit their 8MP sensor. The hump isn't very large, and although it's larger than that of the iPhone 6, it's not near as large as the camera hump on the Galaxy S6. It's honestly not really an issue, but some customers who are very serious about the design of their devices may take issue with it.

Below you can view the known specifications of the Tab S2's rear and front-facing cameras. Unfortunately I don't have data on the specific model of the rear-facing sensors used in the original Tab S series, so that info is omitted on the chart.

Camera Specifications
  Galaxy Tab S1 Series Galaxy Tab S2 Series
Front Camera 2.1MP
(1920x1080)
Front Camera - Sensor S5K6B2
(1.34 µm, 1/6")
Front Camera - Focal Length N/A 27mm eff
Front Camera - Max Aperture F/2.4 F/2.2
Rear Camera 8.0MP
(3264x2448)
Rear Camera - Sensor N/A
(1.12 µm, 1/4")
S5K4H5
(1.12 µm, 1/4")
Rear Camera - Focal Length 32mm eff 31mm eff
Rear Camera - Max Aperture F/2.4 F/1.9

While Samsung hasn't made any radical changes to the camera sensor specifications with the Tab S2, they have significantly widened the rear-facing camera's aperture. Changes to image processing and ISP improvements will also have an enormous impact on image quality.

As always, my photo testing begins with a scene during the day, followed by that same scene at night to test low light performance. While the low light test is still pretty brutal on current tablets, it's a very good indicator of the quality of an OEM's image processing.

During the day the Tab S2 performs very well. Detail is on par with the iPad Air 2, which isn't surprising given the similar sensors and Samsung's large improvements in image processing quality this year. My only complaint is that there is a bit too much sharpening going on which exacerbates the artifacting on the wall of the building caused by the limited effective resolution of the camera system. What's interesting is that the Galaxy S6 Edge processes the image with less sharpening, which is likely intentional on Samsung's part as the S6 has a much larger sensor with a higher resolution. Overall, I'm happy with the Tab S2's camera quality, and I'm glad Samsung decided to give the tablet a bit of a camera hump instead of crippling the camera quality to fit in the 5.6mm profile of the chassis.

Low light photography is where I started to have some issues taking photos with the Tab S2. For some reason it simply refused to run the autofocus, and I had to try and manually focus by tapping which is difficult on such a large device. Once I was able to focus and take the shot I took a few, and the best result is the one you see above. For a tablet it's actually a pretty good photo, although as you can see from the street lamps the photo is definitely overexposed to a degree. Compared with the iPad Air 2 there's actually not much more visible in the frame despite the overexposure, and the Air 2 has a better rendition of the grassy patch on the right side as well as the no parking sign. Both photos are still very good as far as tablets go, but I do think the iPad wins out by a little bit because of the exposure and slightly better detail preservation.

The Tab S2 can record video at 1080p30, and also at 1440p30 although the latter disables video stabilization and so I've opted to just use the 1080p recording mode. Looking back at all the tablets I've evaluated, it's clear that the Tab S2 has the best video recording quality by far. It's definitely not perfect, with some jiggle to the frames caused by the EIS and a bit too much saturation to the colors, but the overall quality, sharpness, and consistency of the frame rate is better than any other device I've tested.

WiFi Performance

Like the original Tab S, the Tab S2 ships with a 2x2 802.11ac WiFi implementation. I actually haven't been able to track down exactly which WiFi chipset they're using, which is unfortunate. The original Tab S actually had strangely slow WiFi performance given its peak theoretical bandwidth of 866Mbps, and I was hopeful that the Tab S2 would fare better.

WiFi Performance - UDP

As you can see, the WiFi performance on the Tab S2 is miles ahead of the previous models, and ends up having the highest peak bandwidth on record for a mobile device. Samsung did a great job improving on last year's WiFi implementation, and if there's going to be any bottleneck over WiFi it's not likely that t it will be the Tab S2.

Display Analysis Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

162 Comments

View All Comments

  • ET - Sunday, October 18, 2015 - link

    I'm a Tab S 8.4 user and my main complaints are only 16GB of storage and games compatibility. I'm glad to see S2 no longer offers 16GB, but I'm still worried about compatibility. All in all, I'm still tempted to move to an iPad Mini the next time I upgrade.
  • jackpom - Monday, October 19, 2015 - link

    I like Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 8.4 Because I'm fan SamSung :)
  • PC Perv - Monday, October 19, 2015 - link

    "in my experience users are far more likely to utilize Chrome based on their awareness of the Chrome brand than they are to use the included OEM web browser"

    What kind of experience of your own gives you an insight of other people's usage habit?

    You are a pathetic liar. If you stop 10 people who use Galaxy phones and ask what browser they use, you will get the answer. And it is not Chrome. Furthermore, on the stock browser users can use fingerprints for web log-ins, which is a convenience you probably did not even know (or care) because you just do not like anything Samsung.

    If I had time I would go over the article and point out how your bias and your abuse English language.. alas my time is not cheap. Consider yourself lucky.
  • nerd1 - Monday, October 19, 2015 - link

    That means most users are just fine with slower performance with mobile chrome, which makes the 'performance advantage' of iPad totall moot/
  • GreyFox7 - Monday, October 19, 2015 - link

    Anyone else disappointed that the S2 comes with an Exynos 5433 and not the better performing Exynos 7420 or 7430? A premium tab should have the premium guts.
  • altrent2003 - Monday, October 19, 2015 - link

    That is very disapointing. I got my Tab S 10.5 for $380. I don't see a single upgrade that is worth the price premium with the S2. The screen size is a big downside.
    And installing CM12.1 on the Tab S made it really useable.
    Thank you for making me save some cash Samsung.
  • UtilityMax - Sunday, October 25, 2015 - link

    Considering the obvious shortcomings of Tab S (poor battery life and poor CPU), I was hoping Samsung could improve in that areas. Nope.
  • lucam - Monday, October 19, 2015 - link

    Still no trace of iPhone 6s review...:)
  • lucam - Tuesday, October 20, 2015 - link

    No iPhone 6s review again yet..maybe we need to wait for iPhone 7 then?
  • GreyFox7 - Tuesday, October 20, 2015 - link

    Why are you deleting my posts and where is your feedback/support button so can ask you?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now