AnandTech Storage Bench - Light

Out Light storage test has relatively more sequential accesses and lower queue depths than The Destroyer or the Heavy test, and it's by far the shortest test overall. It's based largely on applications that aren't highly dependent on storage performance, so application launch times and file load times are what dominate this test. Details of the Light test can be found here.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Data Rate)

The Light test starts to show a distinct advantage for NVMe, and the Samsung UBX controller is performing much better than Intel's SSD 750.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)

The three Samsung NVMe drives have the lowest average service time and the SATA drives are all looking quite slow by comparison.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Latency)

The PCIe drives are all very good about keeping latency outliers to a minimum, but none have yet managed to complete the entire test without any request taking more than 10ms.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Light (Power)

Despite stellar performance, the 950 Pro's power efficiency is poor. If our system could make use of some power management capabilities this situation could be very different, but for many consumers this is just the way things are for PCIe drives. The lack of power management support may be slightly helping some of the latency scores, as transitioning between power states usually requires a short interruption in service.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy Random Performance
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • herbc - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    How fast do you really need to be happy with using a computer is my question , my computer is faster now than i actually need it to be and all it has is a current SSD .
  • Woff - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    I have a system with Asus X99 DeLuxe motherboard and a I7-5960X cpu. I use a Samsung 850 EVO 500GB SSD connected to one of the SATA ports, but I want to upgrade this device to a M.2 Samsung 950 Pro. The motherboard offers two ways to connect a M.2 but I don't know witch is the best alternative. The X99 has a on-board M.2 (socket3) but is also delivered with a expansion card, a 'HYPER M.2 x4' card. Anyone who can help me with the best (fastest) solution to my problem?
  • Redstorm - Friday, October 23, 2015 - link

    You should be OK to use the Onboard M.2 slot as the manual says "32Gb transfer for the onboard M.2" page 'x' so 4 x PCIe 3.0
  • cjelliott - Tuesday, November 17, 2015 - link

    How did you get on with this 950 Pro SSD on the X99 Deluxe? Can you boot from it? I am tempted to buy this SSD but have seen a lot of forums where people are having trouble. I want to install and boot Win 10 Pro from it.
  • l_d_allan - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    Hmmmm ... the Samsung Galaxy review was at the top for 5 days, then one day for an ASUS mother board, and only one day for the Surface 4, and now several days for the Samsung PCie SSD.

    Seems unbalanced. Or just "the luck of the draw"?
  • Kristian Vättö - Sunday, October 25, 2015 - link

    Usually content is only released on weekdays, so reviews that go up later in the week (e.g. on Thursday) may get several days of page time. Oftentimes the content release is dictated by an embargo lift, so the time of publishing isn't on AnandTech's hands.

    I can assure you that this is just a coincidence - there's no rule or contract that a certain company must get X number of days at the top. Frankly, it wasn't even something we thought about during my time at AnandTech as content always went up when it was ready and free for publishing.
  • Craig234 - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    "The Intel SSD 750 clearly needs to come down in price to be completely sidelined by the 950 Pro. "

    I think you mean to AVOID being completely...
  • TheBeagle - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    I case anybody is interested, Amazon.com has this lovely items for sale (pre-order) right now. The Amazon web site says the product will be released for sale on Thursday, October 29th. Hurry up before they're all gone - LOL! Beagle
  • FXi - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    I know it's not a lot of space but some degree of power loss protection would have been proper for a "pro" device in this price category.
  • Kristian Vättö - Sunday, October 25, 2015 - link

    The 950 PRO, just like all Samsung client SSDs, do journaling to protect the FTL against sudden power losses. Protection for cached user data is not really needed since modern file systems have been designed to withstand minor data losses (HDDs also use DRAM to cache writes, so SSDs are no different in that sense).

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now