AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer

The Destroyer is an extremely long test replicating the access patterns of heavy desktop usage. A detailed breakdown can be found in this review. Like real-world usage and unlike our Iometer tests, the drives do get the occasional break that allows for some background garbage collection and flushing caches, but those idle times are limited to 25ms so that it doesn't take all week to run the test.

We quantify performance on this test by reporting the drive's average data throughput, a few data points about its latency, and the total energy used by the drive over the course of the test.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Data Rate)

Both 950 Pros deliver great performance on the destroyer, but the 512GB is outstanding. Clearly the more bursty nature of this test allows the drive to avoid any thermal throttling and deliver the high peak speeds that the PCIe interface is supposed to enable.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

The NVMe drives deliver the lowest average service times, but the other PCIe drives are close behind. If there were any moments of thermal throttling like we saw with the performance consistency test, they would greatly inflate the average  service time.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

The very small number of performance outliers on this test is a good indicator that these drives don't sieze up under the pressure of an interactive workload.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Latency)

When looking at the more strict latency threshold of 10ms, the 256GB 950 Pro is not significantly better than the good SATA drives, but the 512GB has extremely good control over latency.

AnandTech Storage Bench - The Destroyer (Power)

Energy usage is not competitive with the high-performance SATA drives. As demanding as it is, The Destroyer still has opportunities for drives to scale back power consumption but the 950 Pro can't do that on our testbed.

Performance Consistency AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy
Comments Locked

142 Comments

View All Comments

  • Gigaplex - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    What you're proposing isn't actually booting the drive. It's chainloading. The assessment is accurate, and chainloading is a long standing practice for this type of problem. It's also a hack that has no business being used for general consumer usage.
  • R3MF - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    does the supplied samsung driver work with Win7, and is its use as simple as pointing the windows installer to a USB thumbdrive at the appropriate point?
  • Billy Tallis - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    The Samsung NVMe driver was provided as an installer program. After running the installer, there was no need to explicitly change which NVMe driver was used for the 950 Pro. I tested it on Windows 7, 8.1, and 10.
  • Badelhas - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    I have a Vertex 3 128GB SSD. Do you guys believe I will see real world gains if I upgrade to the Samsung 950 Pro 256GB?
  • MrSpadge - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    If your usage is "normal" for a desktop, I suspect "no" is the answer. Unless you're doing a side-by-side comparison. Watch the disk drive LED on your machine. If it's glowing constantly you're being limited by the storage, otherwise not. Or look at the drive load in task manager (shown since Win 8).
  • III-V - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    >For starters, the 950 Pro's power consumption increases as it heats up, and I've seen its idle power climb by as much as 4.5% from power on to equilibrium.

    Er, yeah, that's how typical transistors work... they get leakier as they heat up :\
  • boogerlad - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    What is the latency difference between having this ssd connected directly to the cpu, and through the pch? I'm very curious but no one has tested this.
  • TelstarTOS - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Performance is a bit of a mixed bag, but price/perf ratio is great.
    Waiting for intel countermove now :)
  • DIYEyal - Thursday, October 22, 2015 - link

    Does it suffer from similar thermal throttling issues as it's predecessors (SM951 and XP941)? I have seen people putting a heat sink on these and they report improvement in sustained performance.
  • theMillen - Saturday, October 24, 2015 - link

    http://www.legitreviews.com/samsung-ssd-950-pro-51... will answer any heat throttling questions you have, ie yes! but a simple fan solves them :-p

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now