Display

The review unit that arrived came with an upgraded display. Lenovo offers a 1600x900 panel, but for not very much more you can outfit the device with a 1920x1080 IPS panel. This is going to be a significant upgrade since the 1600x900 version is not IPS, and should therefore be avoided if at all possible. On the configuration page, Lenovo is charging just $60 to upgrade to the better panel which is a good enough deal that I have to question why they even offer the other one at all, but I’m sure there are very price conscious buyers out there. What is not quite as good of an upgrade offer is the $235 upgrade ($175 over the standard 1080p offering) for 1920x1080 with touch which is a lot to pay for touch, and considering the ThinkPad T450s is not a convertible notebook, it’s really not needed.

Because of a resolution that is fairly standard, there is no need for any sort of funky subpixel arrangement on the panel which is a good thing. Lenovo also has an anti-glare coating even on the touch model. The exact panel model is not known because of the way Lenovo overwrites the string, but it has good viewing angles, and consistent lighting levels on the display without any obvious signs of backlight leakage.

To test for color accuracy and display performance, we use SpectraCal’s CalMAN 5 suite with a custom workflow. Brightness and contrast readings are done with an X-Rite i1 DisplayPro colorimeter, and color accuracy is tested with an X-Rite i1Pro Spectrophotometer. Lenovo is one of the few companies that actually includes a default icc profile, so the display was tested with that profile set as active. Displays are tested at 200 nits.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The overall panel does not get very bright. At just 265 nits, it is on the lower end of the scale. This is not great for use outdoors, although the anti-glare coating should help this somewhat. The black levels though are very good, resulting in an excellent contrast ratio of 1263:1. For those that need to or want to work in very dark environments, the T450s has a display that goes all the way down to 2.2 nits output which is perhaps too extreme, but it should be no problem to find a level that is suitable for a dark environment.

Grayscale and White Point

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Display - White Point

Looking at the grayscale, we see an overall average that is under 3, which is a great result. The grayscale does creep up though higher in the range, and full white is closer to an error level of 5 which could be better. On the whole though the grayscale is quite good and the gamma is also decent, coming in at an average of 2.2. The display is a bit cool though, with the reds dropping off as the output gets higher.

Saturation Accuracy

Display - Saturation Accuracy

Saturations are once again very good, with an overall average error of just 2.2. Values under 3 are considered a good result in this test, and the T450s does very well. Even at 100% saturation the values are all very close to correct, and CalMAN shows that this display can do 96% of the sRGB color space.

Gretag MacBeth

Display - GMB Accuracy

The Gretag MacBeth colorchecker is the most comprehensive test, and it scores once again under 3 which is a good result. There is certainly some drift especially on magenta, but overall this is a well calibrated display with an icc profile which helps keep the grayscale in check.

Relative Color Comparator

This is something that we are bringing back to our display testing. The images show a relative color comparison between what the display is supposed to produce and what it actually does. You can see that there is certainly some blue in the whites due to the cool color temperature, but the colors themselves are very close to correct. Please remember that any inaccuracies in your own display will shift these results, so do not take them as absolute values but as relative results.

Display conclusion

Generally the testing would conclude with creating an icc profile and trying to get better results, but there is little need with the T450s. It already has an icc profile which really only helps out grayscale unless you have a 3D LUT which most notebooks lack. The T450s is an overall excellent display and really only has an issue with overall display brightness. If Lenovo could squeeze another 100 nits out of the panel, it would be right up there with the top displays. Just remember to avoid the base 1600x900 panel.

GPU Performance Battery Life and Charge Time
Comments Locked

108 Comments

View All Comments

  • Brett Howse - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    Hi George. Unlikely only because we get our samples out of the USA. I wasn't even aware they had a dGPU version of this but it looks like it has the docking connector removed to fit the 940M. Next time I get a chance to talk to Lenovo I'll try and find out why that's not available in NA as an option. It certainly would be interesting.
  • DanNeely - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    A pity it's either/or. Dell's managed to cram dGPUs and docking connectors into many of their Latitude's for years.
  • wicasapa - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    Hi Brett. Thanks for the comprehensive review.

    Could you comment on the subjective quality of the display compared to XPS FHD, in terms of graininess and fuzziness as a result of matte effect. I may be nitpicking, but XPS, despite its brilliant brightness and contrast, has a grainy quality on white background and web pages.
    Also, is there a difference in this regard compared to the non-touch version of T450s? (is the non-touch more grainy compared to touch version?)

    I look at the microscopic images of the two reviews on your web site, and the XPS looks considerably more fuzzy on those scales, was wondering how they look in real use.
  • kyuu - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    What you're referring to is almost certainly a result of an anti-glare coating. It's an unavoidable side-effect of those coatings. If you're going to be using it outdoors (or near a window during the day), it's worth the trade-off, though.
  • BMNify - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    A matte screen will always have more graininess than a Glossy display but is the only option if use a laptop daily outdoors, buy based on where you will use the laptop.
  • dsraa - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    Yep....better late than never with the review.....anyways, I do like the T450 alot more than the T440. The T440 touchpad or 'clickpad' was horrible. So glad they changed it back.
  • kgardas - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    Now, please Lenovo T460 + Xeon + ECC RAM. I really don't need all the feature of P50 and I really like symmetrical keyboard design.
  • iniudan - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    What your asking is a P series Thinkpad.
  • iniudan - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    Will teach me to read while tired, somehow missed that you mentioned P series in your own comment.
  • nerd1 - Tuesday, September 15, 2015 - link

    I still prefer think pad yoga which has 1080p IPS touchscreen and 940m.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now