The IBM POWER8 Review: Challenging the Intel Xeon
by Johan De Gelas on November 6, 2015 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- IT Computing
- CPUs
- Enterprise
- Enterprise CPUs
- IBM
- POWER
- POWER8
Multi-Threaded Integer Performance
Let's now take a look at multi-threaded workloads. Using all 18 cores causes the E5-2699 v3 to reduce the clock from 3.6 GHz to 2.8 GHz. Our POWER8 CPU on the other hand only has 10 cores.
The result is of course that the POWER8 cannot keep up with the 18-core Xeon, which runs most of the time at 2.8 GHz. But let's not forget that this is not the top-tier POWER8 CPU, which is the 12-core 3.5 GHz DCM inside the S824. All in all, this is solid performance as the POWER8 edges out a 14-core Xeon running at 2.8 GHz (E5-2695).
With LZMA decompression on the other hand, despite having only 10 cores the POWER8 almost keeps up with the 18-core Xeon running at 2.8 GHz. This is remarkable as it has been a long time since we have this kind of performance from a CPU that cost less than half as much as Intel's most expensive Xeons ($4000+).
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
146 Comments
View All Comments
LemmingOverlord - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
Mate... Bite your tongue! Johan is THE man when it comes to Datacenter-class hardware. Obviously he doesn't get the same exposure as teh personal technology guys, but he is definitely one of the best reviewers out there (inside and outside AT).joegee - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
He's been doing class A work since Ace's Hardware (maybe before, I found him on Ace's though.) He is a cut above the rest.nismotigerwvu - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
Johan,I think you had a typo on the first sentence of the 3rd paragraph on page 1.
"After seeing the reader interestin POWER8 in that previous article..."
Nice read overall and if I hadn't just had my morning cup of coffee I would have missed it too.
Ryan Smith - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
Good catch. Thanks!Essence_of_War - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
That performance per watt, it is REALLY hard to keep up with the Xeons there!III-V - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
IBM's L1 data cache has a 3-cycle access time, and is twice as large (64KB) as Intel's, and I think I remember it accounting for something like half the power consumption of the core.Essence_of_War - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
Whoa, neat bit of trivia!JohanAnandtech - Saturday, November 7, 2015 - link
Interesting. Got a link/doc to back that up? I have not found such detailed architectural info.Henriok - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
Very nice to see tests of non-x86 hardware. It's interesting too se a test of the S822L when IBM just launched two even more price competitive machines, designed and built by Wistron and Tyan, as pure OpenPOWER machines: the S812LC and S822LC. These can't run AIX, and are substantially cheaper than the IBM designed machines. They might lack some features, but they would probably fit nicely in this test. And they are sporting the single chip 12 core version of the POWER8 processor (with cores disabled).DanNeely - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
"The server is powered by two redundant high quality Emerson 1400W PSUs."The sticker on the PSU is only 80+ (no color). Unless the hotswap support comes with a substantial penalty (if so why); this design looks to be well behind the state of the art. With data centers often being power/hvac limited these days, using a relatively low efficiency PSU in an otherwise very high end system seems bizarre to me.