The IBM POWER8 Review: Challenging the Intel Xeon
by Johan De Gelas on November 6, 2015 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- IT Computing
- CPUs
- Enterprise
- Enterprise CPUs
- IBM
- POWER
- POWER8
Multi-Threaded Integer Performance
Let's now take a look at multi-threaded workloads. Using all 18 cores causes the E5-2699 v3 to reduce the clock from 3.6 GHz to 2.8 GHz. Our POWER8 CPU on the other hand only has 10 cores.
The result is of course that the POWER8 cannot keep up with the 18-core Xeon, which runs most of the time at 2.8 GHz. But let's not forget that this is not the top-tier POWER8 CPU, which is the 12-core 3.5 GHz DCM inside the S824. All in all, this is solid performance as the POWER8 edges out a 14-core Xeon running at 2.8 GHz (E5-2695).
With LZMA decompression on the other hand, despite having only 10 cores the POWER8 almost keeps up with the 18-core Xeon running at 2.8 GHz. This is remarkable as it has been a long time since we have this kind of performance from a CPU that cost less than half as much as Intel's most expensive Xeons ($4000+).
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
146 Comments
View All Comments
joegee - Thursday, November 19, 2015 - link
It was an awesome community. I learned so much from everyone. I remember the days when we'd write pages arguing whether AMD's new 64 bit extension to x86 was truly 64 bit. The discussions could be heated, but they were seldom rude. I wish there were something similar today. :/Kevin G - Saturday, November 7, 2015 - link
Aces brings back memories for me as well even though I mainly lurked there.A solid chunk of that group have moved over to RWT.
joegee - Thursday, November 19, 2015 - link
What is RWT?psychobriggsy - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
Get back to Aces Hardware you!JohanAnandtech - Saturday, November 7, 2015 - link
Like Ryan said, I have been working 11 years at Anand. In other words, it is great working at Anandtech. AT is one of the few tech sites out there that still values deep analysis and allows the editors to take the time to delve deep.joegee - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
And still writing as well as you ever did! Keep up the good work, Johan!rrossi - Saturday, November 7, 2015 - link
Dear Johan nice article. Did u ever consider sparse system solving (with preconditioning) as a sensitive benchmark? It is a crucial stage of most scientific applications and it is a bandwidth limited operation with a high degree of parallelism. It would be definitely interesting to see how the power 8 fares on such a test. If you are interested I think I could provide a pointer to a simple benchmark (to be compiled). If you feel it may be interesting just drop me an email.JohanAnandtech - Saturday, November 7, 2015 - link
Interested... mail me, I don't have your mail. See the author link on top of the article.Ian Cutress - Saturday, November 7, 2015 - link
I'd also like to be pointed to such a benchmark for workstation style tests on x86. Please email ian@anandtech.com with info :)MartinT - Friday, November 6, 2015 - link
Johan's been with Anandtech for more than a decade, and has been publishing on the subject since the late 90s.But I very much second your "Niiiiice!," as reading his name always reminds me of the old days over at aceshardware, and I'm always looking forward to his insights!