Software: TouchWiz UX and Edge UX

In the case of Android, one of the perennial debates has always been the role of the OEM in regards to software experience. There are some that advocate for OEMs to do the bare minimum, only providing the necessary drivers and other bring-up work to enable a Google/AOSP experience similar to what we see on Nexus devices. On the other end of the spectrum, there are some in the industry that advocate for the use of Android as a base, with significant work on the part of the OEM to introduce their own unique user experiences like MIUI. There’s a ton of room here for personal preference, so it’s necessary to try a UI before deciding that you’re going to be okay with using it for at least the next two years.

 

In the interest of full disclosure, I’m not particularly enamored by “pure” AOSP experiences. In general, I find that AOSP is lacking in a lot of ways when it comes to out of the box experience. There are quick settings, but there’s no way to add or remove toggles. There isn’t a particularly good weather clock widget for the homescreen, and the Google Camera application is light on features to say the least. Basic features like a battery percentage display in the status bar are also missing. While there are people that want to run custom ROMs to personalize all of these things, for most people I think some additions are helpful.

 

In the case of the Galaxy Note5, we’re looking at something that tends a bit closer to a full conversion UI like MIUI. Samsung’s TouchWiz has often received a great deal of criticism, but for better or worse with the Galaxy S5 and S6 Samsung has been toning things down to be closer to Android in terms of overall design and less emphasis on the longest feature list possible. For the Note and Edge lines, Samsung continues to add new features designed to enhance the usability of the stylus and edge display, respectively.

Other than these features, the Galaxy Note5 and Galaxy S6 edge+ have effectively the same UI as what we saw with the Galaxy S6, so those interested in a deeper look at the changes in TouchWiz for everyday use should take a look at the Galaxy S6 review to learn more. For the Galaxy Note5 and Galaxy S6 edge+, the only major changes from the Galaxy S6 are mostly in the form of a new set of icons. In practice, this isn’t really a change if you use a custom theme to try and clean up the aesthetic like any of the material design themes. The vast majority of the differences are centered on the new stylus functions and edge display functions, respectively.

In the case of the stylus functions, the Galaxy Note5 is a definite step up from the Galaxy Note 4. Samsung continues to be one of the few OEMs in the mobile sector to actually take styluses seriously, and it shows with the Note5. There is the problem of damaging the phone if you insert the stylus backwards, but the actual functionality that the stylus provides is excellent.

Although not really a part of the software, the pen itself is well designed so that the tip of the stylus has enough friction so handwriting feels natural. The latency isn’t quite at the level of pencil and paper, but lines track quite closely compared to older models like the Galaxy Note 3 or 4. Even at extreme angles the stylus tracks accurately and inking occurs exactly at the tip of the stylus where it touches the display rather than where the point of the stylus nub is. The pressure sensitivity curve is definitely fine-grained, but I feel like where the lightest possible pressure starts and where the heaviest pressure ends isn’t quite right. If I lightly graze the screen with the stylus, inking doesn’t really work unless I put some downward force to compress the tip. At the high end, it feels a bit like the force needed might be a bit excessive as any normal pencil would have a broken lead if I applied as much pressure as I did with the S-Pen to get to the highest pressure level.

The software aspect of the Note5 is also very well executed for the stylus functionality. When you first take out the stylus with the display on, there’s nothing that immediately launches on the display which helps to reduce clutter. The Air Command display only opens up if you press the side button the stylus, which opens up Air Command. By default, you get shortcuts to pretty much anything you’ll ever use with the stylus, but there’s an option to add more shortcuts if you install extra applications that take advantage of the S-Pen. If you close the menu the Air Command button will remain in a translucent icon overlaid on the display, but it doesn’t react to any touches unless you use the S-Pen and can be removed by long-pressing the button with the S-Pen and dragging it to the top edge of the display. I personally ended up turning this feature off though, as I found it easier to just always press the side button to open up the stylus shortcut menu.

With the Note5, the default applications that support the S-Pen remain. You get Action Memo, S-Note, Smart Select, and Screen Write. Action Memo and S-Note are similar, but Action Memo is more of a quick notepad rather than the full-featured notebook application that is S-Note. Screen Write allows you to directly annotate a screenshot with the stylus, and Smart Select allows you to only screenshot a part of the display that is selected with the stylus.

These apps aren’t new, but they come with new features. For example, the Note5 adds the ability to use Action Memo with the screen off is and it’s quite helpful for writing things down in the moment. Scroll capture is a part of the Screen Write functionality and is similarly useful, but I continue to question why Scroll Capture is embedded into this application instead of being integrated into the native screenshot function.

The final new feature for the stylus is PDF annotation, which is actually quite useful if you’re doing something like signing a contract in PDF form when the agreement requires a signature. More than once, I’ve had to actually print out the document and sign my name, then scan the document before sending the completed document back which is a pretty absurd waste of paper and ink.

The Galaxy S6 edge+ has none of these features, dropping the stylus in favor of the edge display. In practice, there are a few applications that exist for this display. When the display is off and the phone is flipped over, the edge will light up when calls or notifications come in. If a call is coming in and the phone is in this state, you can reject the call by holding your finger over the heart rate monitor. The color can also be set to change depending upon whether a call or text message is coming from a specific contact. The edge display can also be used as a night clock, showing the time and date along the edge of the display. It’s also possible to view some quick information along the edge of the display by swiping along the edge of the display to view some news headlines, the time, date, and weather. The final feature of the edge display is that you can swipe in on the edge of the display to open an app drawer or a quick contacts drawer.

For the most part, all of these features are forgettable. There just wasn’t any good reason to use any of these features. The edge display is a cool piece of technology, but the practical applications are almost nonexistent at this point in time compared to the stylus, which has very obvious and clearly valuable use cases by comparison. I’m trying to keep an open mind about this, but I strongly feel that the edge display is solely an aesthetic change rather than a functional one. The odd touchscreen behavior around the edge makes edge swipes difficult as well, which is also a poor user experience in my experience as Android heavily relies on edge swipes throughout applications.

Overall, TouchWiz continues to be a decent Android skin, but at its core isn’t necessarily a selling point for Samsung phones. In the past we saw that TouchWiz was amazingly performant, but in my experience the Note5 and Galaxy S6 lack a certain level of smoothness. I don’t know how to really quantify this, but using something like a Nexus 5 and comparing it to the Note5 back to back the Nexus 5 has a tendency to feel quicker and smoother for whatever reason. The stylus features of the Note5 are a selling point though, to the extent that it could make the Note5 the only option if you absolutely need a phablet with a stylus. The edge features are unfortunately not nearly as compelling, and the experience is pretty much identical to the Galaxy S6.

System Performance Cont'd and NAND Performance Camera Architecture, UX, and Still Image Performance
Comments Locked

225 Comments

View All Comments

  • The0ne - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    WTF, so you want him to voice on something that doesn't exist then? That's just stupid. I bet you use this argument all the time to feel good about yourself. lol. Be easier if you just tell him to not bother in your little fight at all. Makes much more sense.
  • Sttm - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    Go cry about your real world problems and leave the comments sections of a tech site to us! I'm sure there is a starving kid somewhere that can use your tiny violin services.
  • The0ne - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    He's not crying, he's laughing at you and the other people bitching about the two companies RATHER than enjoying the devices. You totally misunderstood and misinterpreted his comment. Tech sites needs smart people, please just leave. Take your fanboy arguments elsewhere.

    And thanks for sharing something a little about your selfish self, all from your stupidity.
  • melgross - Saturday, October 3, 2015 - link

    Oh, shut up!
  • kspirit - Saturday, October 3, 2015 - link

    No. >:(
  • generalako - Saturday, October 3, 2015 - link

    A more recognized source is the industry standard DisplayMate. Take a look at their tests of the newest Samsung flagships. Ever since the S5, they have been leading in the mark, and ever since the Note 4, their displays have been "considerably better" than the best LCD display (iPhone 6) out there, on virtually every category (contrasts, black levels, efficiency, color accuracy, brigthness, performance in bright lights, viewing angles, sharpness, etc.)

    http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note5_ShootOut_1...

    Anandtech's test is hard to take seriously when they can't even rate the true peak brigthness of the Samsung phones. They don't even mention that they have left it out of their test! When put on auto brigthness, the Note 4, S6 and Note 5 all get far higher brightness than on manual. The Note 5 can reach 861 cd/m2. That's 50% more than Anandtech claim.

    Take a look at DisplayMate's review. They give a proper analysis of the display, which contradicts the Anandtech review on so many areas it's funny.
  • Peichen - Monday, October 5, 2015 - link

    DisplayMate is a Samsung marketing partner. I wouldn't trust it consider them never mention the lackluster AMOLED sub pixel arrangement.
  • MattL - Saturday, October 10, 2015 - link

    What the hell are you talking about... first of all read the DisplayMate Samsung review again and search for "Diamond" where they outline the Diamond sub-pixel arrangement. They also have a completely separate article detailing this arrangement (including a zoomed in picture):

    http://www.displaymate.com/Diamond_29.html

    Also in the review in their spec lists they list the sub-pixel count so you can fully compare resolution and sub-pixel counts... hell for their distance in which 20/20 vision can be resolved by the human eye they include stats for the different subpixel counts (which are different per color based on the Diamond arrangement).

    How you missed all that I have no clue other than you didn't bother to actually read it.

    Also on your first point, Displaymate has been a leader in screen calibration for a long time now... this is their specialty and not the speciality of Anandtech, hence why people take them far more seriously on that topic... it's also why it's a bit surprising Anandtech keeps coming up with different (and less detailed) results, especially when Anandtech doesn't include important values and analysis)... You should really know what you're talking about before you make such a bold response.

    Also Displaymate rates the iPhone screens *very* well, just not as a good as Samsung for the past couple generations. You do realize of course that Apple sources their screen manufacturing from a variety of companies... including Samsung, so it makes complete sense that Samsung is doing better when they finally decided to put the resources into it.
  • Kamus - Sunday, October 4, 2015 - link

    On par? You do realize that a Delta below 3 is very much unnoticeable when it comes to gamut and grayscale calibration right?

    This means that even the galaxy note 4 display smokes any iPhone display to date, because EVERY LCD that has ever been made has downright comical contrast ratio. And OLED on the other hand has the end game in contrast, as in, its perfect.
    The only reason this isn't more obvious is because most of the content viewed in smartphones is bright and viewed in very bright environments. Which sort of gives LCDs a free pass since its contrast ratio deficit isn't as obvious as in those situations.

    You should know that videophilies spend thousands of dollars on displays that offer even slightly better contrast ratios. And here we have a situation where we go from terrible contrast, to perfect. Watch any sort of dark content on both displays at the same time in a light controled environment and you'll immediately see how these Samsung displays are simply in a whole different league.

    Then there's is also the fact that the color gamut is also much wider on OLED, so if the day ever came that we finally decide to stop using the obsolete sRGB standard, OLED would also have an advantage there. (Somethg that had been ironically seen as a disadvantage before they started shiphing phones with color profiles, because the gamut is so wide it results in over saturated colors if a profile isn't is used for sRGB)

    I also have to question the brightness results that anandtech got from their unit. Displaymate stated that this is the brightest smartphone display they have ever tested, they get over 800 Nits on their unit. Making it by far the best display you can use under the sun.

    To meet it seems obvious that LCD has been surprised in most meaningful metrics, and its only going to get worse for LCD as OLED continues to evolve. LCD has never been good enough, but as it matured it got to a point where it became really good in a lot of ways compared to CRTs (never in contrast or switching times)

    TL;DR: these Samsung displays are the benchmark every other display has to be compared to.
  • thedons1983 - Sunday, October 18, 2015 - link

    Yeah, but it's made by Apple, and is pretty much exclusively sold, therefore, to sheep, whom generally have no idea what they are talking about. I'd rather not have a smartphone at all, than one of those ugly ass iphones. But then, that's probably because I actually have taste, and don't just buy whatever hipster rubbish is currently en vogue.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now