System Performance Cont'd

Now that we’ve covered some of the traditionally CPU-bound tests, we can start to look at tests that more strongly emphasize GPU performance. It’s worth noting here that while 3DMark is supposed to determine gaming and graphics performance, the overall score includes a CPU performance component in the form of a physics test that means it isn't much of a pure GPU test.

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Overall

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Graphics

3DMark 1.2 Unlimited - Physics

BaseMark X 1.1 - Overall (High Quality)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Offscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Dunes (High Quality, Onscreen)

BaseMark X 1.1 - Hangar (High Quality, Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

Overall, there's nothing really surprising about these results. The Exynos 7420 should continue to deliver great GPU performance for anyone interested in a high-end phablet or smartphone. There are some improvements in 3DMark in regards to graphics performance, but it's likely that we're just looking at newer drivers as the GPU doesn't heat up fast enough for throttling to be affecting these results.

NAND Performance

At this point, it’s probably not a surprise to know that NAND performance can have very real effects on user experience. If an OEM decides to skimp heavily on storage in order to drive the price down, it’s at least somewhat likely that the device will start to exhibit major IO pauses at some point in the device lifecycle. In order to test this, we rely on our standard storage tests which include Androbench with some custom settings to get more realistic test results along with StorageBench for iOS which is comparable to Androbench.

In the case of the Galaxy Note5 we’re still looking at a UFS storage solution similar to what was found in the Galaxy S6, but it looks like this is slightly newer as the storage is identified as a Toshiba THGLF2G8J4LBATDA chip rather than the Samsung variant that was found in the Galaxy S6. It’s unclear whether Samsung is now multi-sourcing UFS storage for their mobile devices or what distribution exists here.

Internal NAND - Sequential Read

Internal NAND - Sequential Write

Internal NAND - Random Read

Internal NAND - Random Write

Interestingly, the Note5 regresses a little bit in storage performance relative to the Galaxy S6, which is likely due to the shift to Toshiba's NAND. However, this difference is small enough that in everyday use it's unlikely that it will be noticed. Performance over time should be acceptable as well.

System Performance Software: TouchWiz UX and Edge UX
Comments Locked

225 Comments

View All Comments

  • nerd1 - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    And that will make apple look really bad. That's why.
  • nerd1 - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    Using stock browser for comparison will make apple devices look worse. That's why they keep using chrome for benchmarking samsung devices.
  • Pissedoffyouth - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    Why? At least Chrome being the same software actually means it shows true SoC power, because it doesn't have sneaky optimisations and shows real world use
  • lilmoe - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    "shows true SoC power".
    Wrong.

    "because it doesn't have sneaky optimisations"
    Not sure if hateful or biased... These "sneaky" optimizations do show in real world usage.
  • lopri - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    But they do not use Chrome on iPhones and iPads. If they have a different standard for those, I would hope they make it clear in every review applicable and remove those iDevices numbers from Android device charts.
  • kpkp - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    No display power consumption curve :-(
  • mpokwsths - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    Ridiculous NAND measurements.

    Purposely demoting Android phones: http://i-cdn.phonearena.com/images/articles/171432...

    Once again...
  • vanilla_gorilla - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    Thanks for the review, very thorough as always.

    I do have one suggestion. It would be really nice if you setup a nice image gallery for these devices when you do reviews. Maybe each picture could link to the gallery? That way we could click on an image and get to see all of the photos of the device.
  • mayankleoboy1 - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    Could we have a Motox Style and Motox Pure Edition review ?
  • JoshHo - Friday, October 2, 2015 - link

    It is coming although we won't be committing for an ETA.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now