The Mobile CPU Core-Count Debate: Analyzing The Real World
by Andrei Frumusanu on September 1, 2015 8:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Smartphones
- CPUs
- Mobile
- SoCs
Chrome - AnandTech Frontpage
Off the bat we see quite a large difference in the power state distribution graphs. Chrome seems to place much higher load on the little cores compared to S-Browser. When looking at the run-queue chart we see that indeed all cores are almost at their full capacity for a large amount of time.
What stands out though is a very large peak around the 4s mark. Here we see the little cores peak up to almost 7 threads, which is quite unexpected. This burst seems to overload the little cluster's capacity. The frequency also peaks to 1.3GHz at this point. The reason we don't see it go higher is probably that the threads are still big enough that they're picked up by the scheduler and migrated over to the big cluster at that point.
The big cores also see a fair amount of load. Similarly to the S-Browser we have 1 very large thread that puts a consistent load on 1 CPU. But curiously enough we also see some significant activity on up to 2 other big cores. Again, in terms of burst loads we see up to 3 big CPUs being used concurrently.
The total run-queue depths for the system looks very different for Chrome. We see a consistent use of 4-5 cores and a large burst of up to 8 threads. This is a very surprisng finding and impact on the way we perceive the core count usage of Chrome.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
157 Comments
View All Comments
nightbringer57 - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
Very interesting article, much more favourable to multi-core designs than I would have thought.Each article page must have cost an insane amount of time. However, I still feel like some more information could have been useful. This article is geared towards real-world use cases, but I think it would be interesting to repeat this analysis on a few commonly-used benchmarking apps. I feel like this would be interesting to compare them to real-world uses and may help understanding the results.
ingwe - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
Yes that would be very interesting. I am always curious about how synthetics actually compare to more real world applications.Azethoth - Thursday, September 3, 2015 - link
Every single synthetic I have ever seen vastly exaggerates the benefit. I would be interested in an actual real world use case that actually matches a synthetic. It would blow my mind if there are any.Andrei Frumusanu - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
I'll do a follow-up pipeline on this if the interest is high enough.bug77 - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
High enough +1.Please do the follow-up.
tipoo - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
I'd definitely be interested.Drumsticks - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
Yes! This would be neat. Also, great article!ThisIsChrisKim - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
Yes, Would love a follow-up.HanakoIkezawa - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
I'm not sure of the practicality, but I would love to see a follow-up with Denver k1 and the A8X to see how lower core count out of order and in order SoCs are handled.This seriously was a fantastic article Andrei!
kspirit - Tuesday, September 1, 2015 - link
Yes please! +1