Generational Tests on the i7-6700K: Legacy, Office and Web Benchmarks

Moving on to the generational tests, and similar to our last Broadwell review I want to dedicate a few pages to specifically looking at how stock speed processors perform as Intel has released each generation. For this each CPU is left at stock, DRAM set to DDR3-1600 (or DDR4-2133 for Skylake in DDR4 mode) and we run the full line of CPU tests at our disposal.

Legacy

Some users will notice that in our benchmark database Bench, we keep data on the CPUs we’ve tested back over a decade and the benchmarks we were running back then. For a few of these benchmarks, such as Cinebench R10, we do actually run these on the new CPUs as well, although for the sake of brevity and relevance we tend not to put this data in the review. Well here are a few of those numbers too.

Cinebench R10 - Single Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R10 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

x264 HD Benchmark - 1st pass - v3.03

x264 HD Benchmark - 2nd pass - v3.03

7-zip Benchmark

Even with the older tests that might not include any new instruction sets, the Skylake CPUs sit on top of the stack.

Office Performance

The dynamics of CPU Turbo modes, both Intel and AMD, can cause concern during environments with a variable threaded workload. There is also an added issue of the motherboard remaining consistent, depending on how the motherboard manufacturer wants to add in their own boosting technologies over the ones that Intel would prefer they used. In order to remain consistent, we implement an OS-level unique high performance mode on all the CPUs we test which should override any motherboard manufacturer performance mode.

Dolphin Benchmark: link

Many emulators are often bound by single thread CPU performance, and general reports tended to suggest that Haswell provided a significant boost to emulator performance. This benchmark runs a Wii program that raytraces a complex 3D scene inside the Dolphin Wii emulator. Performance on this benchmark is a good proxy of the speed of Dolphin CPU emulation, which is an intensive single core task using most aspects of a CPU. Results are given in minutes, where the Wii itself scores 17.53 minutes.

Dolphin Emulation Benchmark

WinRAR 5.0.1: link

Our WinRAR test from 2013 is updated to the latest version of WinRAR at the start of 2014. We compress a set of 2867 files across 320 folders totalling 1.52 GB in size – 95% of these files are small typical website files, and the rest (90% of the size) are small 30 second 720p videos.

WinRAR 5.01, 2867 files, 1.52 GB

3D Particle Movement

3DPM is a self-penned benchmark, taking basic 3D movement algorithms used in Brownian Motion simulations and testing them for speed. High floating point performance, MHz and IPC wins in the single thread version, whereas the multithread version has to handle the threads and loves more cores.

3D Particle Movement: Single Threaded3D Particle Movement: MultiThreaded

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

FastStone is the program I use to perform quick or bulk actions on images, such as resizing, adjusting for color and cropping. In our test we take a series of 170 images in various sizes and formats and convert them all into 640x480 .gif files, maintaining the aspect ratio. FastStone does not use multithreading for this test, and results are given in seconds.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.9

Web Benchmarks

On the lower end processors, general usability is a big factor of experience, especially as we move into the HTML5 era of web browsing.  For our web benchmarks, we take four well known tests with Chrome 35 as a consistent browser.

Sunspider 1.0.2

Sunspider 1.0.2

Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Kraken 1.1

WebXPRT

WebXPRT

Google Octane v2

Google Octane v2

Comparing IPC on Skylake: Discrete Gaming Generational Tests on the i7-6700K: Windows Professional Performance
Comments Locked

477 Comments

View All Comments

  • MrSpadge - Friday, August 7, 2015 - link

    It works, of course, and is OK for bursty load (like any regular desktop system sees). I'm interested in energy efficeint 24/7 load, however, that's why I said specifically "more than I would give...".
  • royalcrown - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    How much for that sweet board on page 2 of the article ? Please paint in 4 more ram slots, I'll be mailing in a check today. Also, please paint me a 6 ghz processor with 30% OC to go with it and I'll mail another check !
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    "Here’s a suggestion: bring back the old turbo button on a chassis. When we saw 66 MHz become 75 MHz, it was the start of something magical. If Intel wants to grow overclocking, that’s a fun place to start."

    *BAH*

    The turbo button turned my 486 into an 8086 so I could run old games; pushing it certainly didn't give an OC.
  • Teknobug - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    Don't forget the math co-processor
  • DanNeely - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    I had a 486SX, so no hardware FPU in either state.
  • royalcrown - Saturday, August 8, 2015 - link

    Yeah, 80387 FTW !!
  • ant6n - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    I remember hitting that button accidentally on my 33Mhz 386 (it had no MHz display). It took me a couple of days to figure out why the fuck the computer was so slow all of the sudden.
  • zShowtimez - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    So here I am, still going to stick with my 4.8Ghz i7 Sandy Bridge.

    Just going to replace my SLI GTX 670s next year when Pascal comes out...

    I can't rationalize upgrading the CPU when all I use it for is gaming.
  • postem - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    See my other comment. When i switched to 4790K from 950, i through it would be minimal; in some scenarios, yes, but on vastly everything else, its paying off. Comming from 950 @ 4.2 ghz i saw around 20-30% frame increase, in some heavy titles like total war even more.
  • eek2121 - Wednesday, August 5, 2015 - link

    Yes, but you have to realize that the 4790k is not that much faster than the 2600k. Definitely not worth replacing all the components. The 2600 was significantly faster than your 950.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now