Battery Life

A phone is only good to the user when it's charged, so having sufficient battery life to last throughout the day is of the utmost importance. Due to various factors of both hardware and software, it's impossible to determine how long a device will last based solely on the battery capacity. Even still, a device's battery capacity can provide some degree of insight into how long a device should last when also considering the hardware it has to power. In the case of the P8 Lite, the hardware runs off of an 8.36Wh battery, which is actually smaller than a phone like the 2015 Moto E with a smaller display. This is due to the more limited space afforded by the P8 Lite's 7.7mm thick chassis.

In order to characterize the P8 Lite's battery life in various scenarios I've run it through our standard battery tests. First up is the WiFi web browsing test to test battery life in a more display bound workflow, followed by BaseMark OS II, GFXBench 3.0 to test a GPU heavy workflow, and ending with PCMark which is a fairly balanced test of all components.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

In our WiFi web browsing test the P8 Lite falls somewhat short of the median. It's surrounded by the Lumia 640 and the Google Nexus 6, with the ASUS Zenfone 2 sitting further below it but not by that much. In my view OEMs should really be targeting somewhere around 9 to 10 hours of battery life for web browsing at 200 nits, and at 7.8 hours the P8 Lite doesn't make that mark. What concerns me is that the Zenfone 2 isn't that far behind, and it's both $50 cheaper, significantly faster, and has a much sharper display. Better web browsing battery life definitely would have given the P8 Lite a much needed advantage over the competition.

BaseMark OS II Battery Life

BaseMark OS II Battery Score

In BaseMark OS II's battery test the P8 Lite does not perform well at all. Not only is the battery life the shortest device on the chart, but sustained performance throughout the test is much lower than many other devices which leads to it also receiving the lowest battery score of our listed devices.

GFXBench 3.0 Performance Degradation

GFXBench 3.0 Battery Life

With its smaller battery and much higher sustained performance than devices like the Moto G, Moto E, and Lumia 640, it's not a surprise that the P8 Lite lasts a significantly shorter time in the GFXBench battery life test. However, the result doesn't sit far behind many other devices on the chart, and the P8 Lite achieves similar performance at its native resolution. What I can say about battery life in GPU intensive scenarios on the P8 Lite is that it's decent, and it's not at all unexpected given the device's hardware and battery capacity.

PCMark - Work Battery Life

The P8 Lite demonstrates disappointing battery life in PCMark's battery benchmark. This benchmark consists of running through all of PCMark's standard tests in a loop, which gives a good idea of what battery life will be when the phone is subject to various different use cases over a period of time. At 4.68 hours, the P8 Lite falls well behind our other smartphones, and considerably far behind the 2015 Moto E which is a less expensive device.

It's clear from our battery tests that the battery life of the P8 Lite is quite short. This was fairly evident when using the device throughout the day. Something that isn't explicitly shown here is that there appears to be a large amount of battery drain when the device is idle. I often found the battery in need of a charge even during times when the device had only been laying on my desk for the night after minimal use during the day. As far as both active and idle battery life is concerned, the P8 Lite is disappointing.

Charge Time

Charge time isn't often thought of when considering what device to buy, but it can have a substantial impact on the user experience. If a phone lasts a short time and takes a long time to charge then a user can be without a usable device for a much longer period than the battery life alone would imply. On the flip side, a short charge time can improve the experience on a device with shorter than desired battery life by making it quick to get it back to a usable state.

Charge Time

The P8 Lite ships with a 5W charger in the box. Unfortunately, with its stock charger the P8 Lite has the longest charge time of all recent devices. This is a problem when coupled with the P8 Lite's short battery life, as it means the device will run out of power quickly and then take a long time to get back to a 100% charge again.

Camera and WiFi Final Words
Comments Locked

45 Comments

View All Comments

  • Pissedoffyouth - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    Why would you do that though, considering the A53 is so low power anyway. It makes no sense at all. Instead of second cluster put a single A57 core in or something
  • Samus - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    Every little bit helps.
  • protomech - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    4.5 hours to charge a 8.4 Wh battery at 5W is ludicrously bad.

    Is the issue that the wall plug isn't actually delivering 5W (5V 500 mA only maybe?) or that it simply takes an age to go from nearly full to 100%?

    While the 100% charge time test has its uses, it may be more useful to report 0% to 80% charge time, as this should avoids charge taper near the top and is a better indication of how much charge can be recovered in a short period (airport, etc).
  • webdoctors - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    Zenfone 2 at $200 makes this phone a flop, especially considering its not even coming with lollipop, wut?!

    The last paragraph in this review is gold and nicely sums up the entire article:

    The P8 Lite wouldn't be a bad recommendation if it was priced a bit lower and received an update to Lollipop. While I don't know if it would be possible for Huawei to reach a price of $150, I would need the P8 Lite to be priced somewhere below $200 before I could really recommend it. At this time there are simply better options in the $200-300 range, and so at its current price point the P8 Lite is a phone I find difficult to recommend.
  • utmode - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    'Kitkat?'
    Gee, I began to hate this company
  • zodiacfml - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    I have a problem with this company. Most of the phones they're selling these days are not in tune with the market based on specifications, build, and/or branding. They're an adequately sized company selling communications equipment but I doubt they are big and experienced as ASUS or Motorola. Gigabyte also makes phones and laptops but they're reasonably priced as they are not a big brand.

    Anyway, for the specs and review, I'd put this on par or even below a Moto G (2015 and 2014). Yes, it is a thin phone but it ends there.
  • Buk Lau - Wednesday, July 29, 2015 - link

    Nah that's a huge misconception. Huawei if anything is many times bigger than Asus and Motorola combined. They provide equipment and build cellular structures for EUs and they are a government company, and hold enough patents in mobile network that can almost compete with Qualcomm. Smartphone is only a one sector of their business and they are just not taking it seriously enough
  • ToTTenTranz - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    I wonder why Huawei hates having a decent wifi connection in their models.
  • ultimatebob - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    Hey Anandtech, the forums are down again. Can you get someone to look at that when you get a chance?
  • Setec - Monday, July 27, 2015 - link

    Actually, the OnePlus One price was dropped to $249 a few months ago.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now