Throughout the last couple of months AMD has been in the process of carefully and deliberately rolling out their latest generation of video cards. In a multi-staged process we have seen AMD engage in a what is best described as a drawn-out teaser and an early technical briefing, announcing their intention to roll out a new high-end video card this quarter, further teasing the public with pictures of the card, and then in the middle of all of that giving the technical press an in-depth briefing on AMD’s key next-generation memory technology, High Bandwidth Memory. While AMD did their best to make sure the details of the cards were kept under wraps – with varying results – AMD definitely wanted to make sure the world would know that their card was coming.

Catching up to the present, earlier this week AMD held their 2015 GPU product showcase, dubbed “The New Era of PC Gaming.” As the latest stage in AMD’s master plan, AMD held a public event in Los Angeles similar to their 2014 GPU product showcase in Hawaii, where the company announced their product lineup ahead of the full launch of the products in question. In the presentation we learned some (but not all) of the details surrounding AMD’s Radeon 300 series, including the numbered products from 360 to 390, and of course the company’s new high-end flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.

All told the showcase itself was something of a teaser itself – we got prices, but not complete specifications – but we also received confirmation of AMD’s rollout plans. The next stage, coinciding with today’s article, is the formal launch of the numbered members of the Radeon 300 series, which are product refreshes based on existing AMD GPUs, similar to what we saw with the 200 series in 2013. Meanwhile today is also the greater unveiling (but not the launch) of the Fury series, with AMD allowing us to share more details about the new card and its specifications. Following today’s announcements and launches, the Radeon R9 Fury X will be launching in just under a week from now, on June 24th, and then after that the R9 Fury (vanilla) will be launching on July 14th.

AMD R9 300 Series Specification Comparison
  AMD Radeon R9 Fury X AMD Radeon R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 390X AMD Radeon R9 390
Stream Processors 4096 (Fewer) 2816 2560
Texture Units 256 (How much) 176 160
ROPs 64 (Depnds) 64 64
Boost Clock 1050MHz (On Yields) 1050MHz 1000MHz
Memory Clock 1Gbps HBM (Memory Too) 5Gbps GDDR5 5Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 4096-bit 4096-bit 512-bit 512-bit
VRAM 4GB 4GB 8GB 8GB
FP64 1/16 1/16 1/8 1/8
TrueAudio Y Y Y Y
Transistor Count N/A N/A 6.2B 6.2B
Typical Board Power 275W (High) 275W 275W
Manufacturing Process TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Architecture GCN 1.2 GCN 1.2 GCN 1.1 GCN 1.1
GPU Fiji Fiji Hawaii Hawaii
Launch Date 06/24/15 07/14/15 06/18/15 06/18/15
Launch Price $649 $549 $429 $329

Overall AMD is launching an almost top-to-bottom refresh of its product lineup overnight. Between now and July 14th the company and its partners will introduce cards from $109 to $649, and while there are a few gaps that AMD is almost certainly purposely leaving in place to give them something to announce later this year, overall we’re seeing more or less AMD’s entire hand for 2015 and early 2016 in one go.

As for the subjects at hand today, there are really two stories to talk about. The first is of course the Radeon R9 Fury series, the products that will house AMD’s newest flagship GPU, Fiji. While I won’t butter up Fiji from an architectural standpoint at this time, what Fiji does bring to the table are two very big changes for AMD. The first of these is of course high bandwidth memory, which not only gives AMD more VRAM bandwidth than ever before, but it outright changes how GPUs video cards are constructed. The second big change is that Fiji is just very big. At 596mm2 AMD went right to the reticle limit, putting AMD squarely into the big GPU race.

But before Fury comes the rest of the 300 series. We'll take a look at Fury in due time - while we've been briefed on the subject and have been authorized to discuss it, we want to hold back for when we have the hardware in hand - so our focus for today will be on what's launching today, and that's the Radeon 300 series.

Being released today are five new cards from AMD’s partners, which will form the backbone of the Radeon 300 series from $109 to $429. To our regular readers these parts will be familiar – and to some, perhaps more familiar than they’d like – while for AMD the 300 series represents their 3rd generation of retail 28nm products.

Radeon R7 360, R7 370, & R9 380
Comments Locked

290 Comments

View All Comments

  • sabrewings - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    "I do love how you keep bringing the heat argument up regardless of the fact that most 290/X cards have aftermarket cooling solutions."

    It doesn't matter to me if they have aftermarket cooling solutions or not. Heat is heat and it has to go somewhere, usually out into the room I'm sitting in. A difference of 50-60w over the course of several hours is significant. Personally, if I'm going to buy a high power card, how much performance I'm getting to deal with that many watts is important to me. I debated getting the 980 Ti over the 980 because I game at 1080p on my 55" TV and it's 85w more at full chat. However, I do plan on having a VR headset (or various headsets, probably) and the 980 Ti is a great card for that.

    Why didn't I wait until later? My last PC was built in early 2008 and its last video card upgrade was a GTX 275. It was time and I was tired of waiting. No regrets on my purchase yet. I make custom water cooling loops and the AMD CLC looks like a child's toy to me.
  • chizow - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    Briefly read all that, none of what you wrote refutes the fact Maxwell sold incredibly well on the platform of effficiency and updated feature sets.

    FL DX12_1 > FL DX12_0
    HDMI 2.0 > HDMI 1.4
    HEVC encode > N/A
    Full DSR > hodgepodge VSR
    Maxwell ACEs > GCN 1.0 ACEs

    I think quite a few would buy Maxwell over AMD when they've said since September they would have full DX12 support with demos of games with Microsoft to back their claims. AMD's message about DX12 support however, has been much less clear.
  • fingerbob69 - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    RIP gtx480 :/
  • asmian - Saturday, June 20, 2015 - link

    Should be "pique", not "peak", ones interest. Curse those pesky homonyms. ;)
  • T1beriu - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    Vanilla Fury is missing from your price comparison table at $549. The price is official and it was announced by Dr. Su at AMD E3 keynote.
  • happy medium - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    " However it also puts AMD in an interesting position versus NVIDIA, who has stuck to a flat 2GB on their competing GTX 960"

    The gtx960 has had a 4gb card for months on Newegg for about 229$.
  • just4U - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    From my perspective the good news comes in the form of the 390 vanilla card.. It's on par with the 290X according to early benchmarks (1% faster..lol..) comes with 8G of ram and is a $100 less.. in Canada with some actual stock. Since the bit coin craze is over on the Radeons it will also hold it's resale value.. not bad..

    Prices look to be slightly cheaper than the 970 which it is comparable to. Not bad overall... but I'd have preferred the 390X to have come in at that price point. Oh well.
  • strike101 - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    Hope both Nvidia and AMD releases Mid-High Range power effecient GPU's.... less heat at more compact for us on ITX form factors... still stuck on 750Ti.... no alternatives
  • just4U - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    Hi Strike, Can't really speak for either side there as what you see is what you get for the next year or two Im guessing.. but Mid-High range? Nvidia has the 960 and 970 in mini-itx type solutions..

    I've been eyeing the MSI and Asus Variants for sometime especially on the 970.
  • FMinus - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    I wish, few years ago you had a lot more choice in that department, right now not that much. I'm still looking for a single slot solution in the mid-range segment.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now