Throughout the last couple of months AMD has been in the process of carefully and deliberately rolling out their latest generation of video cards. In a multi-staged process we have seen AMD engage in a what is best described as a drawn-out teaser and an early technical briefing, announcing their intention to roll out a new high-end video card this quarter, further teasing the public with pictures of the card, and then in the middle of all of that giving the technical press an in-depth briefing on AMD’s key next-generation memory technology, High Bandwidth Memory. While AMD did their best to make sure the details of the cards were kept under wraps – with varying results – AMD definitely wanted to make sure the world would know that their card was coming.

Catching up to the present, earlier this week AMD held their 2015 GPU product showcase, dubbed “The New Era of PC Gaming.” As the latest stage in AMD’s master plan, AMD held a public event in Los Angeles similar to their 2014 GPU product showcase in Hawaii, where the company announced their product lineup ahead of the full launch of the products in question. In the presentation we learned some (but not all) of the details surrounding AMD’s Radeon 300 series, including the numbered products from 360 to 390, and of course the company’s new high-end flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.

All told the showcase itself was something of a teaser itself – we got prices, but not complete specifications – but we also received confirmation of AMD’s rollout plans. The next stage, coinciding with today’s article, is the formal launch of the numbered members of the Radeon 300 series, which are product refreshes based on existing AMD GPUs, similar to what we saw with the 200 series in 2013. Meanwhile today is also the greater unveiling (but not the launch) of the Fury series, with AMD allowing us to share more details about the new card and its specifications. Following today’s announcements and launches, the Radeon R9 Fury X will be launching in just under a week from now, on June 24th, and then after that the R9 Fury (vanilla) will be launching on July 14th.

AMD R9 300 Series Specification Comparison
  AMD Radeon R9 Fury X AMD Radeon R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 390X AMD Radeon R9 390
Stream Processors 4096 (Fewer) 2816 2560
Texture Units 256 (How much) 176 160
ROPs 64 (Depnds) 64 64
Boost Clock 1050MHz (On Yields) 1050MHz 1000MHz
Memory Clock 1Gbps HBM (Memory Too) 5Gbps GDDR5 5Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 4096-bit 4096-bit 512-bit 512-bit
VRAM 4GB 4GB 8GB 8GB
FP64 1/16 1/16 1/8 1/8
TrueAudio Y Y Y Y
Transistor Count N/A N/A 6.2B 6.2B
Typical Board Power 275W (High) 275W 275W
Manufacturing Process TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Architecture GCN 1.2 GCN 1.2 GCN 1.1 GCN 1.1
GPU Fiji Fiji Hawaii Hawaii
Launch Date 06/24/15 07/14/15 06/18/15 06/18/15
Launch Price $649 $549 $429 $329

Overall AMD is launching an almost top-to-bottom refresh of its product lineup overnight. Between now and July 14th the company and its partners will introduce cards from $109 to $649, and while there are a few gaps that AMD is almost certainly purposely leaving in place to give them something to announce later this year, overall we’re seeing more or less AMD’s entire hand for 2015 and early 2016 in one go.

As for the subjects at hand today, there are really two stories to talk about. The first is of course the Radeon R9 Fury series, the products that will house AMD’s newest flagship GPU, Fiji. While I won’t butter up Fiji from an architectural standpoint at this time, what Fiji does bring to the table are two very big changes for AMD. The first of these is of course high bandwidth memory, which not only gives AMD more VRAM bandwidth than ever before, but it outright changes how GPUs video cards are constructed. The second big change is that Fiji is just very big. At 596mm2 AMD went right to the reticle limit, putting AMD squarely into the big GPU race.

But before Fury comes the rest of the 300 series. We'll take a look at Fury in due time - while we've been briefed on the subject and have been authorized to discuss it, we want to hold back for when we have the hardware in hand - so our focus for today will be on what's launching today, and that's the Radeon 300 series.

Being released today are five new cards from AMD’s partners, which will form the backbone of the Radeon 300 series from $109 to $429. To our regular readers these parts will be familiar – and to some, perhaps more familiar than they’d like – while for AMD the 300 series represents their 3rd generation of retail 28nm products.

Radeon R7 360, R7 370, & R9 380
Comments Locked

290 Comments

View All Comments

  • rtho782 - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    Please don't release that for the PC market. The GPU might be OK (no better than OK, it's a 7870, not made for high end gaming), but the CPU in it sucks balls. It's bobcat.
  • silverblue - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    No no, I don't mean the Jaguar cores, I just mean an APU with a large GPU in the same sort of vein. Throw a quad core Carrizo in there, or something.

    Even if it's "only" a 7870, that's still a lot faster than even Iris 6200.
  • chizow - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    I saw more than 25%, in some cases 50% uplift,, that is destroying especially given you also get MUCH faster CPU as you would expect from a full blown 4-core Intel x86 Core chip. 2x the price today, but that's just standard IGP tomorrow for Intel, all at lower power than their APUs. Fusion is officially dead.

    You can't compare PS4 either, higher TDP and much slower CPU than even AMD's APUs, so what they gain in graphics is lost in CPU and even then Broadwell isn't too far off. Sure Intel has more cash to throw at the problem, but they've basically proven AMD's acquisition to gain competitive advantage in integrated graphics was a complete and total failure that has effectively made 2 competitive companies uncompetitive in their core competencies.
  • OrphanageExplosion - Saturday, June 20, 2015 - link

    The reason you haven't seen the PS4 APU out in the PC space is remarkably simple - you'd get nowhere near its theoretical performance level owing to the DDR3 memory bottleneck. That's why Sony paired it with GDDR5 - something you can't do on PC.
  • Yojimbo - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    Yes did you see its game benchmarks, wow! (Maybe your message should have been scheduled to be released on the 24th instead?)
  • bill.rookard - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    Cautiously optimistic here. I'd love to see some testing of some actual hardware before breaking out the champagne.
  • Akrovah - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    If you have seen benchmarks, then please, link. Otherwise you are just spewing pointless pontifications with no backing.

    Fiji certainly SOUNDS impressive on paper, (though I'd like more than 4GB VRAM for GTA V and Shadows of Mordor) but I have yet to see what the real world result is.
  • fingerbob69 - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    Here you go...
    http://www.forbes.com/sites/jasonevangelho/2015/06...
  • fivefeet8 - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    Those are AMD provided internal benchmarks. Not that I think they are fake or wrong mind you. Probably best case scenarios.
  • masouth - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    I just want to see the actual benchmarks. I hope it all does play out well for AMD because competition is better for the market no matter which company you want to buy from. That said...

    On paper it certainly looks like it will have "unbelievable" performance in all games at 1080p or less and the majority at 1440 however my concern is that the 4gb of memory appears that it will result in a bottleneck at higher resolutions and settings. No matter how how powerful the processor or how fast the memory on the card is, if all the desired data cannot be loaded into the video memory at the same time then the card is going to be at the mercy of the rest of the other computer system's ability to feed it the required data. It may just end up being like driving a Ferrari in rush hour traffic. =/

    Again, that's not as huge of an issue right now but who is buying a video card for the games they wanted to play yesterday? Tomorrow is where it's at.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now