Throughout the last couple of months AMD has been in the process of carefully and deliberately rolling out their latest generation of video cards. In a multi-staged process we have seen AMD engage in a what is best described as a drawn-out teaser and an early technical briefing, announcing their intention to roll out a new high-end video card this quarter, further teasing the public with pictures of the card, and then in the middle of all of that giving the technical press an in-depth briefing on AMD’s key next-generation memory technology, High Bandwidth Memory. While AMD did their best to make sure the details of the cards were kept under wraps – with varying results – AMD definitely wanted to make sure the world would know that their card was coming.

Catching up to the present, earlier this week AMD held their 2015 GPU product showcase, dubbed “The New Era of PC Gaming.” As the latest stage in AMD’s master plan, AMD held a public event in Los Angeles similar to their 2014 GPU product showcase in Hawaii, where the company announced their product lineup ahead of the full launch of the products in question. In the presentation we learned some (but not all) of the details surrounding AMD’s Radeon 300 series, including the numbered products from 360 to 390, and of course the company’s new high-end flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.

All told the showcase itself was something of a teaser itself – we got prices, but not complete specifications – but we also received confirmation of AMD’s rollout plans. The next stage, coinciding with today’s article, is the formal launch of the numbered members of the Radeon 300 series, which are product refreshes based on existing AMD GPUs, similar to what we saw with the 200 series in 2013. Meanwhile today is also the greater unveiling (but not the launch) of the Fury series, with AMD allowing us to share more details about the new card and its specifications. Following today’s announcements and launches, the Radeon R9 Fury X will be launching in just under a week from now, on June 24th, and then after that the R9 Fury (vanilla) will be launching on July 14th.

AMD R9 300 Series Specification Comparison
  AMD Radeon R9 Fury X AMD Radeon R9 Fury AMD Radeon R9 390X AMD Radeon R9 390
Stream Processors 4096 (Fewer) 2816 2560
Texture Units 256 (How much) 176 160
ROPs 64 (Depnds) 64 64
Boost Clock 1050MHz (On Yields) 1050MHz 1000MHz
Memory Clock 1Gbps HBM (Memory Too) 5Gbps GDDR5 5Gbps GDDR5
Memory Bus Width 4096-bit 4096-bit 512-bit 512-bit
VRAM 4GB 4GB 8GB 8GB
FP64 1/16 1/16 1/8 1/8
TrueAudio Y Y Y Y
Transistor Count N/A N/A 6.2B 6.2B
Typical Board Power 275W (High) 275W 275W
Manufacturing Process TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm TSMC 28nm
Architecture GCN 1.2 GCN 1.2 GCN 1.1 GCN 1.1
GPU Fiji Fiji Hawaii Hawaii
Launch Date 06/24/15 07/14/15 06/18/15 06/18/15
Launch Price $649 $549 $429 $329

Overall AMD is launching an almost top-to-bottom refresh of its product lineup overnight. Between now and July 14th the company and its partners will introduce cards from $109 to $649, and while there are a few gaps that AMD is almost certainly purposely leaving in place to give them something to announce later this year, overall we’re seeing more or less AMD’s entire hand for 2015 and early 2016 in one go.

As for the subjects at hand today, there are really two stories to talk about. The first is of course the Radeon R9 Fury series, the products that will house AMD’s newest flagship GPU, Fiji. While I won’t butter up Fiji from an architectural standpoint at this time, what Fiji does bring to the table are two very big changes for AMD. The first of these is of course high bandwidth memory, which not only gives AMD more VRAM bandwidth than ever before, but it outright changes how GPUs video cards are constructed. The second big change is that Fiji is just very big. At 596mm2 AMD went right to the reticle limit, putting AMD squarely into the big GPU race.

But before Fury comes the rest of the 300 series. We'll take a look at Fury in due time - while we've been briefed on the subject and have been authorized to discuss it, we want to hold back for when we have the hardware in hand - so our focus for today will be on what's launching today, and that's the Radeon 300 series.

Being released today are five new cards from AMD’s partners, which will form the backbone of the Radeon 300 series from $109 to $429. To our regular readers these parts will be familiar – and to some, perhaps more familiar than they’d like – while for AMD the 300 series represents their 3rd generation of retail 28nm products.

Radeon R7 360, R7 370, & R9 380
Comments Locked

290 Comments

View All Comments

  • zlandar - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    If that was true why didn't they just put a Fury and 980Ti card side-by-side and benchmark them in front of the world?

    I actually hope you are right as it's unhealthy for Nvidia to keep kicking AMD's ass year-after-year. Last thing we need is for AMD to fold and Nvidia to jack prices even higher.
  • AS118 - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    That's what I'm saying. If AMD goes out of business, who's going to compete with them? Intel APU's? With the US Government being the way it is, Nvidia may be able to claim that Intel's on-chip "HD5000" or whatever graphics is "competition", and use that as an excuse to operate as a monopoly.

    The best we could hope for is that Samsung or Intel or somebody else would buy the Radeon IP and launch some new GPU's to compete with NVidia.
  • royalcrown - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    Not Samsung, they'd keep promising it's finished soon, 3 years later...Samsung 270x 2 GB 2019 edition !
  • FMinus - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    If AMD goes down someone will buy them up and it will be business as usual.
  • tomc100 - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    If AMD folds then if Intel is very smart then they will buy off the ATI division for cheap and with their R&D they will dominate both cpu and gpu technology.
  • Senti - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    But we will cry with their prices then...
  • chizow - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    How so? My Intel CPU prices have enjoyed an unprecedented level of stability since Intel Conroe'd AMD in 2006.
  • Nagorak - Thursday, June 18, 2015 - link

    Unfortunately, CPU performance has also enjoyed an unprecedented level of stability since then as well.

    I'm still running with an i5 2500K bought back in 2011 overclocked to 4.6 GHz. Frankly once you take the OC into account it's basically up there with the newly released i5 CPUs.
  • chizow - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    Intel is innovating and improving performance where they are most deficient, we have a number of E5-2699v3 18-core CPUs in our data center at work that would certainly disagree with your assessement. ;) But just look at what they are doing on the GPU side of things (Broadwell-C just eclipsed and destroyed AMD's best APU) or on the low-end with mobile and Core M and you'll see Intel is still innovating.

    On the CPU side of things, I've had worthwhile upgrades all along the way and I've paid less for each of them than the $450 AMD wanted for their cheapest Athlon 64, which is coincidentally what made it easy to choose Intel again for the first time in years.

    E6600 $284
    Q6600 $299
    i7 920 $199! (middle of recession pricing)
    i7 4770K $229
    i7 5820K $299
  • silverblue - Friday, June 19, 2015 - link

    You don't "destroy" something by performing 25% better at double the price. In any case, we know that AMD's most powerful APU - the one powering the PS4 - is significantly faster at graphics, it's just that AMD haven't seen a point in bringing out such an APU for the computing market... yet.

    Intel has a far bigger wodge of cash to throw at these things, any way you look at it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now