Display

When Surface Pro 3 moved to a 3:2 aspect ratio, it made a lot of sense. 16:9 in a tablet makes for a very poor experience, and in a laptop, it is not much better. Almost everyone has moved to 16:9 in the laptop space and the lack of vertical height can make for a less than ideal experience. Most web content is vertical, and working in Office means you want vertical space as well. The widescreen does help with two windows snapped open at once, but I always find myself craving more vertical room.

On a tablet, I feel that 16:9 is even worse. Holding a 16:9 device in one hand can feel very heavy due to the length of the tablet, and turning it to portrait means that it is very tall and skinny. The move to 3:2 really squares up the device, and makes it a lot more balanced in either direction. Holding it in one hand is much easier, and finally portrait mode is usable on the Surface.

So the aspect ratio is a big improvement. The display size also has a slightly wider corner to corner of 10.8 inches versus 10.6 inch model that came before this. The actual width of the display is about 9 inches, compared to 9.2 on the outgoing Surface 2 model. The display height is now 6 inches, up from 5.2, so the total area of the display is almost 54 square inches, up from 48 inches on the outgoing model.

To fill this display, we have a Panasonic panel with a resolution of 1920x1280. This is roughly the same pixel density as the Surface Pro 3’s slightly larger 12 inch 2160x1440 display, coming in at 217 pixels per inch. It is not the highest PPI of a tablet, but it makes a good compromise between desktop and tablet use. Speaking of desktop use, I found that it makes a perfectly acceptable size for a small notebook, and even with touch it was not too difficult to work with the icons.

When Microsoft launched Surface 3, it said “with incredibly accurate colors and clarity from multiple viewing angles” and that would be excellent to see. The Surface Pro 3 has a decent display, but it was not the most accurate device we’ve tested.

To do our display testing, we use SpectraCal’s CalMAN 5 suite with a custom workflow. Brightness and contrast readings are taken with an X-Rite i1Display Pro colorimeter, and color accuracy is measured with an X-Rite i1Pro spectrophotometer. We target 200 nits brightness when doing our tests.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The Surface 3 gets quite bright, coming in at 432 nits at maximum output. The black levels are a bit high, but overall contrast is a decent 920:1. This makes the Surface 3 almost 100 nits higher than the Surface Pro 3 that Anand reviewed last year, which is a good start for this less expensive version.

Grayscale

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Display - White Point

The grayscale average for the Surface 3 is very good, coming in just about at 2.5 as an average for the sweep. There is a bit of a spike at 25% but it is not indicative of the overall calibration. Gamma is a bit low, but the white point is fairly close to the ideal value.

Saturation

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The accuracy on our saturation tests is outstanding, with an overall average score of just 1.57. Looking at the individual colors, the red is a bit oversaturated at 100%, and blue tends to be undersaturated, but the amount of error is very small.

Gamut and Gretag Macbeth

Display - Gamut Accuracy

Display - GMB Accuracy

Once again the Surface 3 comes in with fantastic scores on these two tests, with the comprehensive GMB test under 2. When we are doing these tests, values under 3 are considered good, and the Surface 3 has passed with amazing scores. The best part of this is that all of this is done without the use of an ICC profile, so that means the hardware is being calibrated directly. ICC profiles can fix some issues, but not all programs respect them so having it done in hardware is a much better option.

Calibrated

Since this is a full x86 Windows operating system, we can also calibrate the display with the CalMAN software. Even though it was very good out of the box, the calibration pulls it even closer to perfection.

Surface 3 has one of the most accurate displays we have ever tested, which is great to see in what is considered the value member of the Surface family. Microsoft promised an accurate display and they have delivered.

GPU and NAND Performance Battery Life
Comments Locked

265 Comments

View All Comments

  • Brett Howse - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    The battery in the Surface Pro 3 is 50% larger. 28 Wh vs 42 Wh
  • chizow - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    That gulf will probably grow as well with the rumors SP4 may have a Core M variant. Cherry Trail is a bit disappointing though, not a huge increase in performance and this S3 actually has worst battery life than some of its Bay Trail predecessors like the Asus T100.

    Even more telling is the next slowest device in most of your tests is the $79 HP Stream 7, and while the Surface 3 certainly has more going for it in terms of form factor and functionality, a sub-$100 device is going to get a lot of passes where a $500 might not.
  • Shadowmaster625 - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    That battery is the ultimate symbol of greed. Like they couldnt eat an extra $6 to give the thing a respectable battery. We need some explanation as to what exactly is the bottleneck in a game like DOTA 2. The <20 fps is extremely disappointing. but is it the GPU or the anemic CPU cores that hold it back? And why didnt they at least double the L1? Talk about greed.
  • dullard - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    "I’m not sure if we have found a “perfect” aspect ratio for a tablet"

    One aspect ratio would be nearly perfect for almost every use, if only tablet manufacturers would make a tablet at that aspect ratio. That nearly perfect ratio is 2^0.5 : 1 (about 1.414 : 1).

    1) A program designed to fill the screen at 2^0.5 : 1 would also perfectly fill half the screen at 1 : 2^0.5/2 (which is still 1.414 : 1 when rotated). Finally, we could have distortion-free multi-tasking with no extra programming needed, an issue that no tablet has really yet solved.

    2) It is a natural-feeling aspect ratio, not too tall or too narrow. No "narrow video" warnings needed. Webpages that haven’t been converted to mobile would still work well. It would have good hand feel.

    3) It is almost exactly A4 paper ratio (1 : 1.41421 vs 1:1.41428). A4 is the standard paper for 2/3rds of the world. Thus a Word document, PDF, or similar would fill the screen uncropped. It isn't far off from from the US 11:8.5 paper standard either.

    4) It is pretty much in the middle of the 4:3 digital camera and 3:2 DSL camera aspect ratios. That means when using the camera to see photos, it will look good with minimal cropping or black bars.

    I could go on and on.
  • Jon Tseng - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    >Having the third position really helps in a lot of situations, and while I would have liked the
    >final one to open as wide as the Surface Pro 3,

    There is actually a fourth position. Give it a good shove and it collapses even flatter. Not sure if this is a genuine position or a manufacturing fail safe though!
  • Jon Tseng - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    More details herehttps://www.reddit.com/r/Surface/comments/33rxja/s...

    I tried it on a demo unit in curry's. It works the stand is def engineered to open this far (whether its engineered to do it regularly I don't know)
  • gsusx - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    Wtf. Curry's have them in stock. . Where?
  • Jon Tseng - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    The big Curry's on Tottenham Ct Road has a demo unit out. Had stickers on saying "property of Microsoft not sale stock" so presumably its a pre-release date demo unit. Yeah I was surprised to see it too!
  • beggerking@yahoo.com - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    micro usb type-c would be better , but a standard micro usb charging is still a huge leap forward vs any proprietary charging port.

    reversibility is for idiots. PERIOD.
  • kmmatney - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    I take it you haven't used a reversible charging plug? It is a much better solution. Period.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now