Display

When Surface Pro 3 moved to a 3:2 aspect ratio, it made a lot of sense. 16:9 in a tablet makes for a very poor experience, and in a laptop, it is not much better. Almost everyone has moved to 16:9 in the laptop space and the lack of vertical height can make for a less than ideal experience. Most web content is vertical, and working in Office means you want vertical space as well. The widescreen does help with two windows snapped open at once, but I always find myself craving more vertical room.

On a tablet, I feel that 16:9 is even worse. Holding a 16:9 device in one hand can feel very heavy due to the length of the tablet, and turning it to portrait means that it is very tall and skinny. The move to 3:2 really squares up the device, and makes it a lot more balanced in either direction. Holding it in one hand is much easier, and finally portrait mode is usable on the Surface.

So the aspect ratio is a big improvement. The display size also has a slightly wider corner to corner of 10.8 inches versus 10.6 inch model that came before this. The actual width of the display is about 9 inches, compared to 9.2 on the outgoing Surface 2 model. The display height is now 6 inches, up from 5.2, so the total area of the display is almost 54 square inches, up from 48 inches on the outgoing model.

To fill this display, we have a Panasonic panel with a resolution of 1920x1280. This is roughly the same pixel density as the Surface Pro 3’s slightly larger 12 inch 2160x1440 display, coming in at 217 pixels per inch. It is not the highest PPI of a tablet, but it makes a good compromise between desktop and tablet use. Speaking of desktop use, I found that it makes a perfectly acceptable size for a small notebook, and even with touch it was not too difficult to work with the icons.

When Microsoft launched Surface 3, it said “with incredibly accurate colors and clarity from multiple viewing angles” and that would be excellent to see. The Surface Pro 3 has a decent display, but it was not the most accurate device we’ve tested.

To do our display testing, we use SpectraCal’s CalMAN 5 suite with a custom workflow. Brightness and contrast readings are taken with an X-Rite i1Display Pro colorimeter, and color accuracy is measured with an X-Rite i1Pro spectrophotometer. We target 200 nits brightness when doing our tests.

Brightness and Contrast

Display - Max Brightness

Display - Black Levels

Display - Contrast Ratio

The Surface 3 gets quite bright, coming in at 432 nits at maximum output. The black levels are a bit high, but overall contrast is a decent 920:1. This makes the Surface 3 almost 100 nits higher than the Surface Pro 3 that Anand reviewed last year, which is a good start for this less expensive version.

Grayscale

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Display - White Point

The grayscale average for the Surface 3 is very good, coming in just about at 2.5 as an average for the sweep. There is a bit of a spike at 25% but it is not indicative of the overall calibration. Gamma is a bit low, but the white point is fairly close to the ideal value.

Saturation

Display - Saturation Accuracy

The accuracy on our saturation tests is outstanding, with an overall average score of just 1.57. Looking at the individual colors, the red is a bit oversaturated at 100%, and blue tends to be undersaturated, but the amount of error is very small.

Gamut and Gretag Macbeth

Display - Gamut Accuracy

Display - GMB Accuracy

Once again the Surface 3 comes in with fantastic scores on these two tests, with the comprehensive GMB test under 2. When we are doing these tests, values under 3 are considered good, and the Surface 3 has passed with amazing scores. The best part of this is that all of this is done without the use of an ICC profile, so that means the hardware is being calibrated directly. ICC profiles can fix some issues, but not all programs respect them so having it done in hardware is a much better option.

Calibrated

Since this is a full x86 Windows operating system, we can also calibrate the display with the CalMAN software. Even though it was very good out of the box, the calibration pulls it even closer to perfection.

Surface 3 has one of the most accurate displays we have ever tested, which is great to see in what is considered the value member of the Surface family. Microsoft promised an accurate display and they have delivered.

GPU and NAND Performance Battery Life
Comments Locked

265 Comments

View All Comments

  • SpartanJet - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    I initially wasn't going to buy but if you purchase through the Microsoft store you can get a 10% .edu discount and also use the 5% Microsoft discount you get by texting. My total came out to be ~$675 which included the 4/128, Type cover, pen, and tax.
  • RBFL - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    Did you look at the Thinkpad 10, when Lenovo has one its sales you can get the 4/128 with a 'real' keyboard for about $550. Admittedly one gen behind this on atom but not bad and seems to aim at quite a similar usage.
  • RafaelHerschel - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    I use MS Office plus iTunes and Kindle on a cheap Windows tablet from Acer with 2GB ram plus a 32GB ssd and everything runs just fine. I specifically wanted a 2GB tablet for testing purposes and I'm impressed how well it works.
  • jabber - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    I think some folks haven't realised that you DON'T have to carry around all your software and data ALL the time. Some of us work pretty light. My work laptop has hardly any user data on it at all. It all goes up the cloud. Software wise it has Office 2013, Firefox/Chrome and a couple of other bits and bobs and that's it. All sits on around 25GB on a 120GB SSD. Folks are weighing themselves down far too much. Take a serious look at what you really need/use.
  • RafaelHerschel - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    True. I had to make the transition as well. I used to fill up hard drives with clutter. I changed my attitude for a variety of reasons. One of those reasons is that wanted to work more efficient.

    On my desktop games take up space, but games can be removed and later re-installed from Steam or another similar service.
  • Michael Bay - Wednesday, May 6, 2015 - link

    Have you ever used at least a baytrail tablet before spewing such nonsense?
  • hans_ober - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    The charge times are horrible. They should have added the Surface charging port + micro usb charge support (for emergencies). Or just used USB C.
  • Doroga - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    Would be a great thing to fix barrel distortion in product photos.
    Very easy to do it in full auto with modern software
  • duploxxx - Monday, May 4, 2015 - link

    The GPU in the Surface 3 is really not enough to play most games, and even on our value settings, the Surface 3 is not a great experience for DOTA 2. The higher TDP of Core M lets it do ok in this test, but overall the Surface 3 is a long way back of even the Surface Pro 3 Core i3.

    poor Intel, 2015 and still not able to provide a gpu decent to play a game, guess what Intel look at the market, all kids use tablets these days to play games, none will ask for a x86 based one...unless they have stupid parents still just going for the jingle. but then again the market of mobile games is flood by ARM based games, way to late for mobile windows based things..
  • Jon Tseng - Tuesday, May 5, 2015 - link

    Bay Trail runs Skyrim and Far Cry 3 fine. Cherry Trail with 4x the EUs should have no problem.

    I guess it comes down to your definition of "most games"...

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now