Force Touch Trackpad

Along with Apple’s changes to their keyboard, the company has also gone in and significantly reworked their trackpad. The new Force Touch Trackpad represents the biggest change to Apple’s trackpad design since the creation of the capacitive, multi-touch pivoting trackpad introduced on the unibody MacBook Pro. In putting together the Force Touch Trackpad, Apple has significantly reworked the internals of the trackpad, creating a trackpad that behaves a lot like their traditional trackpad with some new features, but under the hood relies on some very different mechanisms.

The big change here is that Apple has done away with the traditional pivot and switch mechanism. With pivot and switch, the capacitive trackpad surface would act like a small touchscreen, and underneath it was a switch to register when the trackpad was pressed down. Mechanically the trackpad pivoted from the top (Apple likes to compare it to a diving board), with the trackpad inferring what action to take based on the combination of the capacitive readings and the switch reading. Multi-finger gestures would rely solely on the capacitive layer, primary/secondary clicks would be based on the number of fingers in use when the switch was actuated, etc.

The Force Touch Trackpad on the other hand eliminates the pivot and switch mechanism in favor of a combination of an electromagnet and force/pressure sensors. The pressure sensors essentially replace the physical switch, allowing the trackpad to tell when it has been pressed based on the amount of pressure, and thanks to the pressure sensors it can now tell how hard it has been pressed as opposed to the binary nature of the physical switch. Meanwhile without a physical switch in place to provide the clicking sensation and feedback of pressing down on the touchpad, Apple’s electromagnet – the Taptic Engine – activates to simulate the feeling and noise of pressing a switch.

Update 04/15/2015: iFixit has a great shot of the trackpad's internals, including a good look at just how big the electromagnet/taptic engine really is.


Image Courtesy iFixit

The end result is that the MacBook’s trackpad is among the first wave of devices that ships with Apple’s next generation trackpad and the enhanced capabilities that go with it. Ignoring the pressure sensitivity for a moment (we’ll get back to it), replacing the pivot and switch for an electromagnet works shockingly well. From a touch & feel standpoint the Force Touch Trackpad feels virtually identical to a traditional trackpad, to the point where it’s more than a bit uncanny. In practice you are not actually triggering a switch nor is the trackpad really moving (technically it’s deforming ever so slightly), but it sure feels like you’re working a switch. Apple has clearly done their homework on getting an electromagnet to emulate a switch, to great results. Meanwhile they don’t have the trackpad’s acoustics precisely matching a switch, but the resulting pinball-machine like plunk is close enough to a click that I don’t imagine anyone will mind the difference.

One side benefit of this change is that the trackpad feels the same throughout, and unlike the pivoting trackpad does not require more or less force depending on where you are relative to the pivot point. The variable force required has never been a major problem in my experience, but it is nice to no longer need to worry about where your fingers are relative to the top, and consequently how much force you need to use.

However the bigger deal is that by making the amount of force required to click consistent throughout the entire trackpad, Apple can now use the amount of pressure applied as another input, making the trackpad pressure-sensitive. The underlying pressure sensors and electromagnet are by default programmed to have two levels of feedback – a shallower press is equivalent to a click – and a deeper press brings about the pressure-sensitive “Force Click.” What force clicking does depends on the application, and right now it’s clear that Apple is still experimenting with what they can do with pressure sensitivity. The most obvious uses include line thickness in drawing applications, but the company is also using it for things such as variable speed fast forward and rewinding in QuickTime/iMovie. At times the force click is treated like a 3rd (tertiary) click, and other times the result is based on variable pressure. Since this is a new (and uncommon) feature there’s no global action assigned to the force click – nor does it behave as a middle click on a regular mouse – so what happens is up to the application.

In implementing force click and the Force Touch Trackpad, Apple does offer the ability to control the amount of pressure required and whether force click is active. With force click deactivated the trackpad behaves more or less identical to a traditional trackpad with a single click level. Meanwhile the click pressure setting is interesting, though I’m not entirely convinced it’s all that effective. Short of the tools to actually measure click pressure, I’m not so sure Apple is changing the amount of pressure required to trigger a click so much as they’re changing how hard the electromagnet vibrates. The feedback change is certainly very subtle going from light to firm, and if there is a change in the amount of pressure required then it is certainly equally subtle.

Ultimately whether the Force Touch Trackpad is a major upgrade or not is going to depend on a user’s ability to make use of the force click features. Even turned off, the new trackpad is essentially an improved version of the old trackpad without the minor drawbacks of the pivot mechanism. But with the force click turned on, then it brings new (though not always useful) actions to the trackpad that in turn makes it a bigger upgrade over the old trackpad.

In any case, the MacBook along with the 2015 MacBook Pro 13” are the first wave of devices to implement the new Force Touch Trackpad. Given its expanded capabilities I would expect Apple to eventually replace many (if not all) of their trackpads with this new design. Certainly the 15” MacBook Pro is a likely candidate, as is a future version of the Magic Trackpad. What remains to be seen is whether the next MacBook Air also gets this new trackpad, or if Apple withholds it to keep the products differentiated and to keep the costs of the MacBook Air down.

Getting Thinner: New Keyboard, Keys, & Switches USB Type-C: Charging Power, Display, & Data All in One
Comments Locked

354 Comments

View All Comments

  • Kevin G - Wednesday, April 15, 2015 - link

    Correct but that adapter only provides a HDMI 1.4a connection. The 30 Hz refresh rate there is due to the lower bandwidth of that HDMI port.

    Straight USB Type-C to DisplayPort 1.2 should be able to provide nearly twice the bandwidth, and hence potential 60 Hz 4K resolution. You'll note that that Apple page makes no reference to the MacBook using such an adapter.
  • Kevin G - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Also what are the PCI device and manufacture IDs for that SSD? Anything interesting in ioreg from the command line regarding it?
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    VEN_106B&DEV_2001
  • Kevin G - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    That's Apple and looking at some of their other devices, they don't have a history of changing vendor IDs for rebranded products (the Mac Pro RAID card seems to be a recent exception). It points in the direction of a custom controller but it is not conclusive.

    With a bit of quick poking around, I couldn't find Anobit's vendor ID for PCI devices. Not too surprising considering that they focused on SATA and SAS storage controllers before. Still, with SATAe on the horizon, you'd think that they would have registered for a vendor ID before their acquisition by Apple.
  • DARBYOTHRULL - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Does anyone think that this would be an okay machine for a computer science student? The portability is very attractive to me
  • ws3 - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    There is no doubt that it is acceptable for a CS student. However if you plan on using it for 3+ years you might find yourself constrained in the future if you have a need/desire to run multiple virtual machines plus boat anchor IDE, etc.

    By constrained I mean that everything should still work but if the average laptop of 2019 has 32gb RAM and you are stuck with 8, then you'll be on the low end of average.

    On the other hand, when I was in CS, a 30Mhz cpu and 2Mb RAM was the bomb diggity ultra. And that kind of computer ran vi and cpp just as well as the MacBook does.
  • edhburns - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    That entirely depends on what kind of work your teachers have you doing.
  • Impulses - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Is it really THAT much more portable than cheaper ultrabooks (ASUS UX305 - $700) or faster ones tho? (Dell XPS13 for the same kinda money) If I wanted something ultra portable I'd go for a Surface, just being able to snap or fold back the keyboard and go over code with someone while standing up makes it rather flexible.

    Outside of that I'd just get as much laptop as I can for the money, the new MB isn't terrible in that sense (better than the Air in most ways) but I don't see it as the best compromise either. If anything, wait for the second one. :p
  • ws3 - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Those computers aren't running Mac OS X, which is pretty important for most people thinking of purchasing a Mac.
  • darwinosx - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Exactly. Comparing the two makes no sense as if the OS were interchangeable. Especially given how many people hate the current Windows iterations designed by committee more for Microsoft's needs than their customers.
    Also I have zero interest in owning a low quality laptop like Asus or Dell.
    The Surface is both a lousy laptop and a lousy tablet.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now