Force Touch Trackpad

Along with Apple’s changes to their keyboard, the company has also gone in and significantly reworked their trackpad. The new Force Touch Trackpad represents the biggest change to Apple’s trackpad design since the creation of the capacitive, multi-touch pivoting trackpad introduced on the unibody MacBook Pro. In putting together the Force Touch Trackpad, Apple has significantly reworked the internals of the trackpad, creating a trackpad that behaves a lot like their traditional trackpad with some new features, but under the hood relies on some very different mechanisms.

The big change here is that Apple has done away with the traditional pivot and switch mechanism. With pivot and switch, the capacitive trackpad surface would act like a small touchscreen, and underneath it was a switch to register when the trackpad was pressed down. Mechanically the trackpad pivoted from the top (Apple likes to compare it to a diving board), with the trackpad inferring what action to take based on the combination of the capacitive readings and the switch reading. Multi-finger gestures would rely solely on the capacitive layer, primary/secondary clicks would be based on the number of fingers in use when the switch was actuated, etc.

The Force Touch Trackpad on the other hand eliminates the pivot and switch mechanism in favor of a combination of an electromagnet and force/pressure sensors. The pressure sensors essentially replace the physical switch, allowing the trackpad to tell when it has been pressed based on the amount of pressure, and thanks to the pressure sensors it can now tell how hard it has been pressed as opposed to the binary nature of the physical switch. Meanwhile without a physical switch in place to provide the clicking sensation and feedback of pressing down on the touchpad, Apple’s electromagnet – the Taptic Engine – activates to simulate the feeling and noise of pressing a switch.

Update 04/15/2015: iFixit has a great shot of the trackpad's internals, including a good look at just how big the electromagnet/taptic engine really is.


Image Courtesy iFixit

The end result is that the MacBook’s trackpad is among the first wave of devices that ships with Apple’s next generation trackpad and the enhanced capabilities that go with it. Ignoring the pressure sensitivity for a moment (we’ll get back to it), replacing the pivot and switch for an electromagnet works shockingly well. From a touch & feel standpoint the Force Touch Trackpad feels virtually identical to a traditional trackpad, to the point where it’s more than a bit uncanny. In practice you are not actually triggering a switch nor is the trackpad really moving (technically it’s deforming ever so slightly), but it sure feels like you’re working a switch. Apple has clearly done their homework on getting an electromagnet to emulate a switch, to great results. Meanwhile they don’t have the trackpad’s acoustics precisely matching a switch, but the resulting pinball-machine like plunk is close enough to a click that I don’t imagine anyone will mind the difference.

One side benefit of this change is that the trackpad feels the same throughout, and unlike the pivoting trackpad does not require more or less force depending on where you are relative to the pivot point. The variable force required has never been a major problem in my experience, but it is nice to no longer need to worry about where your fingers are relative to the top, and consequently how much force you need to use.

However the bigger deal is that by making the amount of force required to click consistent throughout the entire trackpad, Apple can now use the amount of pressure applied as another input, making the trackpad pressure-sensitive. The underlying pressure sensors and electromagnet are by default programmed to have two levels of feedback – a shallower press is equivalent to a click – and a deeper press brings about the pressure-sensitive “Force Click.” What force clicking does depends on the application, and right now it’s clear that Apple is still experimenting with what they can do with pressure sensitivity. The most obvious uses include line thickness in drawing applications, but the company is also using it for things such as variable speed fast forward and rewinding in QuickTime/iMovie. At times the force click is treated like a 3rd (tertiary) click, and other times the result is based on variable pressure. Since this is a new (and uncommon) feature there’s no global action assigned to the force click – nor does it behave as a middle click on a regular mouse – so what happens is up to the application.

In implementing force click and the Force Touch Trackpad, Apple does offer the ability to control the amount of pressure required and whether force click is active. With force click deactivated the trackpad behaves more or less identical to a traditional trackpad with a single click level. Meanwhile the click pressure setting is interesting, though I’m not entirely convinced it’s all that effective. Short of the tools to actually measure click pressure, I’m not so sure Apple is changing the amount of pressure required to trigger a click so much as they’re changing how hard the electromagnet vibrates. The feedback change is certainly very subtle going from light to firm, and if there is a change in the amount of pressure required then it is certainly equally subtle.

Ultimately whether the Force Touch Trackpad is a major upgrade or not is going to depend on a user’s ability to make use of the force click features. Even turned off, the new trackpad is essentially an improved version of the old trackpad without the minor drawbacks of the pivot mechanism. But with the force click turned on, then it brings new (though not always useful) actions to the trackpad that in turn makes it a bigger upgrade over the old trackpad.

In any case, the MacBook along with the 2015 MacBook Pro 13” are the first wave of devices to implement the new Force Touch Trackpad. Given its expanded capabilities I would expect Apple to eventually replace many (if not all) of their trackpads with this new design. Certainly the 15” MacBook Pro is a likely candidate, as is a future version of the Magic Trackpad. What remains to be seen is whether the next MacBook Air also gets this new trackpad, or if Apple withholds it to keep the products differentiated and to keep the costs of the MacBook Air down.

Getting Thinner: New Keyboard, Keys, & Switches USB Type-C: Charging Power, Display, & Data All in One
Comments Locked

354 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Thanks! Fixed.
  • ppi - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Can the single USB port both charge and use some accessories?

    I mean, can I, assuming I have proper dongle, come to my desk and plug the dongle, that would charge the notebook and connect it to external monitor, keyboard, mouse and ethernet, all at once?
  • Tegeril - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Yes, and here's the dongle. USB type C, USB you're used to, HDMI: http://store.apple.com/us/product/MJ1K2AM/A/usb-c-...
  • TallestJon96 - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    "Moving on, as a Retina display Apple offers a range of scaled (virtual) resolutions, with the MacBook’s default resolution serving as a HiDPI version of 1280 x 800. The fact that the scaled resolution is not exactly one-quarter of the display’s physical resolution is an unusual first for an Apple device, but considering the size of the display and power requirements, not to mention the similar PPIs to the rMBPs, I suspect 1280 x 800 scaled on a 2304 x 1440 display was a tradeoff. In any case even without perfect 2:1 scaling Retina-enabled applications look great, and now nearly 3 years after started on Retina in the OS X ecosystem, the number of applications without Retina support are thankfully miniscule."

    "As far as desktop performance goes, we haven’t found any major problems for the MacBook’s Intel HD Graphics 5300 GPU. Even with Core M’s power limits it doesn’t show any issues holding 60fps at the default virtual resolution of 1280 x 800, though I would not suggest going any higher unless it’s necessary."

    Does this indicate that the desktop is rendered at 1280x800 instead of the native resolution? I would find that appallingly unacceptable for the graphics to not be able to handle the DESKTOP level graphics. Am I miss understanding the meaning of these paragraphs?
  • kyuu - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    You are misunderstanding. It is rendered at the higher resolution and then scaled down to emulate a 1200x800 resolution in terms of the size of the rendered elements.
  • TallestJon96 - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Thanks for clearing that up, seemed pretty strange for it to render at less than native resolution
  • kyuu - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    As Tegeril below explains, it actually renders at *higher* than the native resolution.
  • Tegeril - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    The laptop renders at 2560x1600 and scales it down to the 2304x1440 display as the "default". When referencing virtual resolution, the author is simply talking about what Apple says it "looks like" and essentially what the "1x" equivalent of what is actually being rendered is.

    The laptop can also render at 2880x1800 and display that on the 2304x1440 display, creating a virtual resolution that feels like 1440x900...and then some lower ones that are fairly unreasonably small unless you suffer vision impairment.
  • R0H1T - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Tell that to the millions who bought netbooks, back in the day, looking to do something mildly productive on it.

    Hell try selling that to anyone who uses Baytrail (& now Cherrytrail) with Windows on it that their device is best used just for surfing! Pretty sure a bunch of commentators here advocated why these convertibles are so much better for their productivity, than Android tablets, due to Windows & all that computing power at their disposal.
  • nyoungman - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Thanks for the in-depth review. I noticed a few typos along the way:

    > The performance of tablets is continuing to improve though faster CPUs (pg 1)
    Should this be "through" faster CPUs.

    > On the other hand though we’re talking about the MacBook Air coming within 20% of larger laptops
    I think you mean "MacBook" in this sentence. (pg 9)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now