The 14nm tri-gate for process from Intel has currently been seen in both Core M (Broadwell-Y) and Broadwell-U, with some discussions at Mobile World Congress regarding Atom x5 and Atom x7 both featuring 14nm cores at their heart. For the mini-PC and laptop space, Core M fits nicely with a 4.5W TDP and the Core architecture, however Intel’s Atom line also occupies a similar segment but at a lower price point. The upgrade from Bay Trail is Cherry Trail, from 22nm Silvermont cores to 14nm Airmont cores. Technically it would seem that Cherry Trail is a catch-all name with the SoCs intended for mini-PCs will also ride under the name ‘Braswell’, using up to four Atom cores and Generation 8 graphics within a 4-6W TDP.

CPU World recently published details of four Braswell SKUs. For Braswell, similar to Bay Trail, Intel designs its Atom SoCs in terms of dual core modules, where each core is separate apart from a shared L2 cache. The SoC then puts one or two of these modules on die (for two or four cores) without an overriding L3 cache. The Braswell SoCs will support DDR3-1600 memory, with SIMD instructions up to SSE4 with support for VT-x and Burst Performance Technology offering higher clocks for extremely short periods when required.

The four SoCs are presented as follows:

Intel Braswell SKUs
SKU Cores /
Threads
CPU
Freq
CPU
Burst
L2
Cache
TDP Price
Celeron N3000 2 / 2 1040 2080 1 MB 4W $107
Celeron N3050 2 / 2 1600 2160 1 MB 6W $107
Celeron N3150 4 / 4 1600 2080 2 MB 6W $107
Pentium N3700 4 / 4 1600 2400 2 MB 6W $161

This is similar to elements of both the Bay Trail-M (Mobile) the Bay Trail-D (Desktop) product line, which would perhaps mean that we will see both inside mini-PCs as well as some laptop designs, such as Chromebooks. In the current Braswell list there are two dual core models and two quad core models, although in the Bay Trail-D line there are six in total with four Celeron and two Pentium. The Celeron N3000 from the Braswell line is an interesting element to consider, especially when we compare it against the similar TDP of the Core M 5Y10.

  Celeron N3000 Core M 5Y10
Architecture Airmont Broadwell
Cost $107 $281
Cores / Threads 2 / 2 2 / 4
Base Frequency (MHz) 1040 800
Turbo / Burst (MHz) 2080 2000
L2 Cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L3 Cache - 4 MB
TDP 4 W 4.5 W
GPU 'Gen 8' HD 5300
Execution Units Unknown ? 24
GPU Frequency / MHz 320-600 ? 100-800
DRAM DDR3-1600 DDR3/L-1600

Ultimately Intel’s differentiation lies with the architecture and price, meaning Core costs more, and historically this also correlates with performance. That being said, Core M is susceptible to both cTDP-Up and cTDP-Down depeding on how the OEM wants to use it. Braswell may be in a similar position, although we do not have confirmation of this as of yet.

It will be interesting to see what applications for Braswell will be released first. I would imagine everything we currently see in Bay Trail-D form should get an upgrade. We have already seen shots of ECS’ roadmap for the LIVA which states a Q2 2015 launch for example.

Source: CPU World

POST A COMMENT

30 Comments

View All Comments

  • witeken - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Take those prices with a grain of salt. For example, there are Chromebooks of $250 with a ~$200 Haswell Celeron CPU. Reply
  • psychobriggsy - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Indeed, it seems very few OEMs ever pay list price for Intel CPUs, the discounts are very deep in some cases.

    And that's before contra-revenue giveaways!
    Reply
  • Krysto - Tuesday, April 7, 2015 - link

    No, don't. Those FIRST "Haswell Celeron" Chromebooks were heavily subsidized. All the latest ones use Atom "Celerons" at the same price points. Intel tricked the market, because it showed the "powerful yet cheap Haswell Celeron Chromebooks", and now everyone wants an "Intel-powered Chromebook" for $200, even though it NOW uses an Atom chip...that's just as powerful, if not less powerful than the latest ARM chip. Reply
  • MrCommunistGen - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Don't joke about cookies. Reply
  • MrCommunistGen - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    aaaand I fail at life... responded to the article and not the comment Reply
  • MrCommunistGen - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Don't joke about cookies. Reply
  • Wardrop - Thursday, April 2, 2015 - link

    You failed twice. Impressive. Reply
  • En1gma - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    afaik, Airmont is name of CPU cores, Braswell is name of SoC and Cherry Trail is name of platform, like Silvermont - Valley view - Bay Trail Reply
  • Shadowmaster625 - Tuesday, March 31, 2015 - link

    Those prices are simply outrageous. Reply
  • Ammaross - Friday, April 3, 2015 - link

    New theory: maybe Apple pays list price for their CPUs, hence their prices.... Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now