Civilization: Beyond Earth

Shifting gears from action to strategy, we have Civilization: Beyond Earth, the latest in the Civilization series of strategy games. Civilization is not quite as GPU-demanding as some of our action games, but at Ultra quality it can still pose a challenge for even high-end video cards. Meanwhile as the first Mantle-enabled strategy title Civilization gives us an interesting look into low-level API performance on larger scale games, along with a look at developer Firaxis’s interesting use of split frame rendering with Mantle to reduce latency rather than improving framerates.

Civilization: Beyond Earth - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality

Civilization: Beyond Earth - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

Though not as intricate as Crysis 3 or Shadow of Mordor, Civilization still requires a very powerful GPU to run it at 4K if you want to hit 60fps. In fact of our single-GPU configurations the GTX Titan X is the only card to crack 60fps, delivering 69fps at the game’s most extreme setting. This is once again well ahead of the GTX 980 – beating it by 31% at 4K – and 40%+ ahead of the GK110 cards. On the other hand this is the closest AMD’s R9 290XU will get, with the GTX Titan X only beating it by 23% at 4K.

Meanwhile at 1440p it’s entirely possible to play Civilization at 120fps, making it one of a few games where the GTX Titan X can keep up with high refresh rate 1440p monitors.

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Min. Frame Rate - 3840x2160 - Ultra Quality

Civilization: Beyond Earth - Min. Frame Rate - 2560x1440 - Ultra Quality

When it comes to minimum framerates the GTX Titan X doesn’t dominate quite like it does at average framerates, but it still handily takes the top spot. Even at its worst, the GTX Titan X can still deliver 44fps at 4K under Civilization.

Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor Dragon Age: Inquisition
Comments Locked

276 Comments

View All Comments

  • Antronman - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    The Titan has always been marketed as a hybrid between a gaming and graphics development card.
  • H3ld3r - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    Agree 100%
  • H3ld3r - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_Titan...
  • Evarin - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    For people thinking that VRAM is unneeded, you must not be heavy into modding. Especially with Fallout 4 and GTA 5 on the horizon, massive amounts of room for texture mods will come in handy.
  • Black Obsidian - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    6-8GB would seem to meet that requirement nicely.

    As is often the case with "doubled RAM" models, by the time that 12GB of VRAM is useful, we'll be a couple of generations down the road, and cards with 12GB of VRAM will be much faster, much cheaper, or both.

    Maybe at that point a Titan X owner could pick up a cheap used card and run them in SLI, but even then they're laying out more money than a user who buys a $500 card every couple of years and has the VRAM he/she needs when it's actually useful.
  • H3ld3r - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    I agree with you but don't forget how vram is used in sli and cf. Vram of gpu 1 mirrors vram of 0 so if have 2x 4gb you're only taking advantage of 4gb. Anyway i prefer fast ram than hughe amounts of it.
  • Evarin - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    We've already had a game which called for 6GB VRAM for an advanced texture pack. Imagine an Elder Scrolls or a Fallout where every single object in the game has a 4k resolution texture. I think it'd be a challenge even for the titan.
  • Antronman - Sunday, March 22, 2015 - link

    The way that RAM works is the worse your system is, the more RAM you end up needing.

    There are plateaus, but as GPUs get faster you need less VRAM to store the same amount of information.

    The Titan X is much faster than the Titan BE, and thus needs less VRAM, assuming that the application is the same.

    Then we get into Direct X 12 and Vulkan. They're supposed to increase efficiency all-around, reducing the demand for resources like RAM and cores even more.
  • Death666Angel - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    "the card is generally overpowered for the relatively low maximum resolutions of DL-DVI "
    So I can drive my 1440p 105Hz display with it and get above 105fps? No? So what kind of statement is that then. DL-DVI may be old, but to say that 1440p is a low maximum resolution, especially with 100Hz+ IPS displays which rely on DL-DVI input, is strange to say the least.
  • H3ld3r - Thursday, March 19, 2015 - link

    Based in what i saw in ryan's review 4k games aren't that much memory demanding. If so how can anyone explain R9 performance?

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now