Final Words

When the Lumia 830 launched as an “affordable flagship” at IFA 2014, I thought it would be just another midrange phone. But the Lumia 830 has some great features that make it feel like a flagship. The device has a premium feel in-hand, and is much nicer to carry and hold than the actual 930 flagship due to the thickness of the device. It is reasonably light, and keeps the distinctive Lumia polycarbonate back. A real bonus over the 930 is that the back is removable as well, which also allows the device to more easily gain microSD support, which it has.

But the SoC inside the Lumia 830 can detract from the flagship feel. Windows Phone has always had great support for low end phones, so the Snapdragon 400 has no issues with basic animations. It is when you launch apps and do work inside of apps where you can see it struggling for performance. My biggest complaint with the Lumia 830 is that it is too slow to be marketed where it is. There is a huge chasm in performance between the low end Lumias (530, 630, 730, 830) and the high end Lumias (930, 1520). It would be nice to see a progression in speed at some point in the lineup but it is just not there. The SoC does not cripple this device in any way, but after using the Lumia 930 for a while it sure shows that Cortex A7 at 1.2 GHz is pretty pokey.

But the package as a whole is very good if you can overlook the couple of extra seconds it takes to open Skype. The fit and finish of this device is right up there with the high end Lumia phones despite the removable back. It takes a bit of work to get it snapped on, but once it is there it has no flex or creaking of any kind. The camera on the Lumia 830, although a far cry from the 930 and 1020 as far as pure performance, is quite good and has decent low light performance due to the OIS.

I am a bit surprised how much I do like the 830 overall, despite the SoC. The combination of the metal band, a thin chassis, a light weight, a decent display, and a decent camera make for a phone that is very good for the right price.

And with the price we get to the crux of the issue. The Lumia 830 is a great phone for the right price, but it seems that the pricing for it is too high for most locations. As an on-contract phone, the Lumia 830 needs to be at or around $0 on contract. AT&T has it for $99 on contract, which is simply too much for this device. In Canada, it is a different story though with the 830 being $0 on a 2-year contract from all carriers. For an outright price, we are seeing some pretty powerful phones coming in at or around the $400 mark where the 830 is around. Once again, AT&T is a bit higher, but this device needs to be around $350 or so. It has a premium feel, but clearly there were some corners cut so the price should reflect this more.

If you are looking for a midrange Windows Phone today though, the Lumia 830 is certainly one you want to check out.

Software
Comments Locked

98 Comments

View All Comments

  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    "Lumia 830 that it did not jump up to at least the Snapdragon 600"

    Do you really understand what Snap 600 is?

    It is good they don't use it here.
  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    "Snapdragon 600 for sure seems like it would have been a perfect fit "
    again, NO
  • Brett Howse - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    They (Nokia/Microsoft) don't seem prepared to move to 610 yet, although the 800 would of course be a better chip with integrated baseband. Just anything better than 400 at this price range is needed.
  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    What "anything" exactly?
  • Laxaa - Saturday, November 29, 2014 - link

    They should have shipped it with a downclocked S800. When the 820 was released alongside the 920, the hardware was pretty much the same, aside from the lower res screen and the lack of OIS on the camera.
  • cheshirster - Saturday, November 29, 2014 - link

    And I had that 820.
    1650mah + top hardware is not really a good choise.
    Yes, it could run games and tests but with violent battery discharge rates at 40%-50% per hour.
    S800 + 2200mah would be the same sad story.

    I think L830 is perfectly balanced for non-gamers, basically for every grown up user.
  • Laxaa - Sunday, November 30, 2014 - link

    I guess I can agree with that. Still, I wish it was a step up from the 630 and 730.

    I tried one yesterday at my local store and it feels really good in the hand. They've done great job with the body and I'm excited to see where they go from here. Hopefully the 940 will build on that template.
  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    Galaxy A3 is the phone that beats price records for S400 hardware.
    L830, that is priced right on most markets.
  • jasont78 - Saturday, November 29, 2014 - link

    curious in alot (most) of the graphs iphones are at the top of the stack but at the same time alot of the phones that are in some graphs say lumia 930 are omitted. seems to me like iphones are getting propped up once again to look like the best shiz on the market. if you are going to run graphs keep the stacks fair and truthful and use the same phones in all of them or your just cheating the public and helping the apple marketing department which by the they dont need the help.
  • Brett Howse - Saturday, November 29, 2014 - link

    The only graphs that don't have the 930 are the Basemark X 1.1 graphs since the benchmark would not run on the 930.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now