Battery Life

Battery life, like the display, is one of the most important aspects to any smartphone. The Lumia 830 comes with a removable BV-L4A battery, which is a 2200 mAh, with 3.8-volt chemistry. This gives us a battery with 7.04 Wh of capacity. This is quite a bit smaller than the Lumia 930’s 9.20 Wh battery, but it also powers a lower resolution display which is much less power hungry than the Lumia 930’s OLED unit.

As with the performance comparisons, the graphs below are a subset of all of our devices which I chose to compare the Lumia 830 against other phones which are in the same market. Someone considering the Note 4 is likely not cross shopping with a Lumia 830 for instance. If there is a device that we’ve tested, you can use our online benchmark comparison tool Bench to compare any devices we have tested.

To compare battery life, we set all devices to the same brightness level (200 nits) in order to not penalize displays which have a higher maximum brightness. We then put them through several tests a couple of times each to ensure accurate results.

One note is a change to how I am testing Windows Phone battery life. Historically I have run a battery life test, and then done it again with Battery Saver enabled. Battery Saver on Windows Phone stops all background apps from syncing while it is running, and things like email will not work with push support. On our Android reviews, we already disable background syncing while doing battery life testing to ensure consistent results, so starting with the Lumia 830 I will be only showing battery life with Battery Saver enabled. Feel free to give me your feedback in the comments below, but this should give a more accurate result and a baseline we can work off of.

Web Browsing Battery Life (WiFi)

Our first test is web browsing over Wi-Fi. The Lumia 830 is very good here. When doing the Lumia 930 review, that device would actually get warm to the touch just from displaying a white background, but the Lumia 830 does not suffer any of those issues with its LCD display. The result of almost ten hours of screen on time is very good, and should allow almost anyone to easily get through a day of use before needing to charge. Please note that I have adjusted the Lumia 630 and 930 results in the above graph to show them with Battery Saver enabled so that this is an apples-to-apples comparison.

Web Browsing Battery Life (2G/3G)

Although the Lumia 830 does support LTE, it will of course fall back to HSPA if the LTE signal is not strong enough. HSPA battery life is not fantastic. I was unable to test LTE battery life on this phone due to the model shipped to me.

In addition to the web browsing test, we have also started to utilize the Basemark OS II Battery Life test.

BaseMark OS II Battery LifeBaseMark OS II Battery Score

The Lumia 830 does well in the battery life for Basemark, but that does not tell the entire story. The overall score is calculated based on the average battery life loss per minute, as well as the standard deviation and CPU usage during the test. Windows Phone is at a disadvantage here somewhat due to the nature of the benchmark. As it cannot get CPU usage information from the OS, it does not factor it into the final score. While the benchmark was running, the CPU usage was only at 10%.

Charge Time

The speed at which a device can charge can be fairly important if you travel a lot and need to top up. Generally devices charge quickly at the beginning and then ease back over time until they hit 100%, so this is more than just about the overall charge time to 100%. I will now include a graph with the charge percentage over time.

Charge Time

The Lumia 830 comes with a 1.5 Amp micro USB charger, which can fill the battery in about 2:40. This is a higher amperage charger than is included with a device such as the Lumia 630, and it makes a difference. The Snapdragon 400 SoC does support quick charge, at up to 9 volts at 1.5 amps, and Windows Phone does support this.

The Lumia 830 charge rate is fairly consistent all the way up until 90% where it starts to taper off.

For those that hate plugging in their phones, the Lumia 830 also supports Qi wireless charging out of the box.

Camera Wi-Fi, Cellular, GNSS, Speaker
Comments Locked

98 Comments

View All Comments

  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    "Lumia 830 that it did not jump up to at least the Snapdragon 600"

    Do you really understand what Snap 600 is?

    It is good they don't use it here.
  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    "Snapdragon 600 for sure seems like it would have been a perfect fit "
    again, NO
  • Brett Howse - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    They (Nokia/Microsoft) don't seem prepared to move to 610 yet, although the 800 would of course be a better chip with integrated baseband. Just anything better than 400 at this price range is needed.
  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    What "anything" exactly?
  • Laxaa - Saturday, November 29, 2014 - link

    They should have shipped it with a downclocked S800. When the 820 was released alongside the 920, the hardware was pretty much the same, aside from the lower res screen and the lack of OIS on the camera.
  • cheshirster - Saturday, November 29, 2014 - link

    And I had that 820.
    1650mah + top hardware is not really a good choise.
    Yes, it could run games and tests but with violent battery discharge rates at 40%-50% per hour.
    S800 + 2200mah would be the same sad story.

    I think L830 is perfectly balanced for non-gamers, basically for every grown up user.
  • Laxaa - Sunday, November 30, 2014 - link

    I guess I can agree with that. Still, I wish it was a step up from the 630 and 730.

    I tried one yesterday at my local store and it feels really good in the hand. They've done great job with the body and I'm excited to see where they go from here. Hopefully the 940 will build on that template.
  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    Galaxy A3 is the phone that beats price records for S400 hardware.
    L830, that is priced right on most markets.
  • jasont78 - Saturday, November 29, 2014 - link

    curious in alot (most) of the graphs iphones are at the top of the stack but at the same time alot of the phones that are in some graphs say lumia 930 are omitted. seems to me like iphones are getting propped up once again to look like the best shiz on the market. if you are going to run graphs keep the stacks fair and truthful and use the same phones in all of them or your just cheating the public and helping the apple marketing department which by the they dont need the help.
  • Brett Howse - Saturday, November 29, 2014 - link

    The only graphs that don't have the 930 are the Basemark X 1.1 graphs since the benchmark would not run on the 930.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now