Camera

The Lumia 830 carries the PureView branding on the camera, which Nokia has saved for the heavy hitting cameras. As the line has evolved, the PureView brand appears to be for phones with Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), although as with any branding that may change in the future. The Lumia 830 is by far the lowest end PureView camera so far, with just a 1/3.4” sensor size attached to the OIS mechanism and the six lens optics. The 10.0 megapixel count results in the typical for Lumia 1.1 µm pixel size. The sensor is also a 16x9 native format. The flash is handled by a single LED. It is good to see OIS in a midrange device such as this but the small sensor and small pixel size is going to limit the amount of data that can be collected in dim lighting even with OIS allowing the exposure time to be a bit longer than normal.

To measure camera performance we start with the ISO12233 chart which allows us to test for spatial resolution as well as the amount of processing done by the ISP to get rid of aliasing.

ISO12233 Test Chart

With a smaller sensor size and the same small pixel size, the Lumia 830 cannot do the pixel binning of its PureView brethren. The ISO chart reveals that this is not the same PureView as other devices with the same branding.


Once we dig into the chart a bit, we can see that the Lumia 830 starts to struggle around the 13 mark on our chart. This is not all about pixel count either, as the lower resolution iPhone can capture up until the 15 mark. The Lumia 930, with its much larger 1/2.5” sensor can pretty much resolve the entire chart and the Lumia 1020 with the PureView 41 MP camera easily resolves the sagittal lines.


 

The tangential lines show a similar story, with the Lumia 830 unable to resolve after around the 13 mark. With a 10 MP sensor, I would have hoped to see it resolve at least the same as the iPhone.

Next we will take a look at some controlled scenes.

Controlled Scenes


The Lumia 830 does a good job on a well-lit scenes. The amount of detail is good, and the color balance is very good as well. These shots were taken in full auto, so while it would be possible to correct the Lumia 1020 white balance with the manual controls, most of the time people just leave the camera in auto so it is important for the device to get the right cast.


To stress the camera under poor lighting, we set the light box to 5 lux and leave the flash off. The Lumia 830 does a decent job here again, once again getting the white balance spot on. As compared to the Lumia 1020 photo, there is quite a bit more noise in the final image which is not surprising with the sensor size difference. If you were not going to crop this image it would be very usable.

Outdoor Scenes (Night)

Moving out of the comforts of home, I braved the elements to get some outdoor pictures. The first scene is a park bench which is lit by a low-pressure sodium-vapor light which has a distinctive yellow hue. This scene is dark enough that the image preview on the phone is pretty hard to make out.


The Lumia 830 does a good job with this scene. It keeps some of the yellow cast of the sodium light, but the result is a very usable photo. If you zoom in on it, there is more noise than the 1020 but the overall result is very good.


The picture of the grocery store tells a similar tale. The Lumia 830 gets a better white balance than the Lumia 1020 and the result is a good photo. The Lumia 1020 as always struggles to get the correct white balance when in auto mode even though the resultant picture has much less noise.

Outdoor Scenes (Day)

Moving to daytime, there is generally ample light that even small sensors have no issue getting a reasonable photo.


The Lumia 830 had no issues during daylight with any of the subjects. This picture makes a great comparison with the detail loss as compared to the Lumia 1020. Please ignore the color differences between the photos as the sun ducked behind a cloud, but instead look at the detail of a zoomed in image.

Lumia 830 (Left) vs Lumia 1020 (right) in Cropped comparison - view at full resolution to see full effect

The Lumia 830 is a good camera for basic point and shoot smartphone photography but it lacks the imaging power of the other PureView phones such as the 930 and 1020. A 1/3.4” sensor and the much lower pixel count removes the ability to do pixel binning to improve the overall result, and it also removes the ability to do lossless zoom.

Another missing feature from the Lumia 830 as compared to the other PureView cameras is the ability to capture in RAW format.

As a still photograph camera, we still need to look at one more feature that can impact camera use – latency.

Capture Latency

Being able to take a photograph quickly can mean the difference between getting a great shot and missing the subject altogether. We have seen a great push in the industry in the last while to improve the focus latency, with some cameras now using phase detection and other tricks to increase the focus speed. The other half of that is the capture latency of taking the photo and saving it so that the camera app is ready to go again. We will start with focus. As with the performance benchmarks, I sampled several phones that may be shopped against the Lumia 830. If you want to check out the 830 against any other device, please visit our benchmark comparison pages in Bench.

Camera Focus Latency (Shooting ISO 12233 Target)

The Lumia 830 is the fastest Lumia I have tested for focus latency, with it occurring in just over 600 ms. While not the outright fastest device for focus we have ever tested, improvement is always welcome. Next up, we will look at the latency to initiate a photo save it to disk.

Camera Shot Latency (Shooting ISO 12233 Target)

At IFA, Microsoft announced they were going to be launching a new camera app at the end of this year and it cannot come soon enough. The Lumia Camera app is especially slow, with a total capture latency of 2.4 seconds before it is ready for another shot. The default Windows Phone camera app is slightly faster at 2 seconds even. The Lumia 930 outperforms it here which likely means that it is being held back by the slower SoC onboard.

Camera Latency (Shooting ISO 12233 Target)

Total latency is the time to focus and the time to capture and save the image. The Lumia 830 is a very slow camera. It is hard to say anymore other than hopefully the new camera app improves this situation.

Video

The 830 has four microphones which allow it to capture video in Dolby Digital surround sound, which is a nice bonus. The video resolution and frame rate options are fairly sparse though, with the only options being 1080p or 720p at 24, 25, or 30 frames per second.

I did two videos with the first one being during the day and the second one at night.

The video during the day was during very high winds (50 km/h+) and with the default low pass filter enabled on the video the amount of wind noise was pretty good.

The night video shows the limits of the sensor quite clearly. OIS helps with the camera shake, but on still photography it allows for an increased exposure time to combat a small sensor. On a video, the sensor gets no such bonus and as such there is quite a bit of noise.

Display Battery Life and Charging
Comments Locked

98 Comments

View All Comments

  • kspirit - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    In addition: I am aware that the design of the 830 probably hadn't started at the time of the acquisition. But I can't believe the same Nokia who put glance and camera buttons on even the 620 two years ago wouldn't do it in the x30 refreshes. Especially considering that those were unique, signature capabilities that competing manufacturers don't offer. MS must have had some input in this phone. I'm sure they would have cared about cost cutting on the company they were just on the brink of acquiring. No?
  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    Glance and camera button obviously presented on L830 :)

    You should be really high on something to blame it for having features that 730 and 630 are missing.
  • retrospooty - Monday, December 1, 2014 - link

    Yeah, I dont think he is grasping the Tiered model#'s and the concept of price points. He seems to be assuming newer is always higher end, even on a lower end model.

    Now if the 925 replacement came out and was lesser than the 925 he would have a great point. But the 830 is NOT the 925 replacement model.
  • Sabresiberian - Tuesday, November 25, 2014 - link

    Keep in mind that Microsoft/Nokia hasn't released anything intended to be more than a midrange or low-end phone since the Icon/930. It may look like they are cutting back to those of us interested in flagship devices - but it isn't really the case. :)
  • close - Tuesday, November 25, 2014 - link

    Well... they are using the same low-end SoC on 4 of their product lines which is disappointing (5xx, 6xx, 7xx, 8xx). And for a smart phone some CPU performance is a must otherwise the experience is really frustrating. More so than not having some niche features like glance. I'm not talking about intensive 3D games, but it should allow the user to comfortably run applications without feeling the performance hit. I was expecting the 830, maybe even the 730, to have the 600 series SoC. MS/Nokia have skipped the mid-range and went from low-end to high-end. Although the premium build and other features don't really compensate for the distinct lack of snappiness in applications.

    It's like building a premium sedan with a 1l engine.
  • melgross - Tuesday, November 25, 2014 - link

    I imagine they're trying to save money. Considering g how small sales are, they need to buy fewer parts in larger quantity to have any hope of a profit, which, from looking at Microsoft's financials shows isn't likely happening.

    They are also concentrating on lower priced models in order to attempt to get sales in China, where they've fallen to 0.6%, and India, where sales are down as well. Samsung seems to be working on the same strategy, from their last announcement.
  • PubFiction - Tuesday, November 25, 2014 - link

    They need to stop thinking about making money and start thinking about releasing an attractive product and actually getting people to buy their stuff. Nickel and diming right now is not going to work.
  • cheshirster - Friday, November 28, 2014 - link

    Their sales are two-three times larger then HTC and larger then Moto for many quarters (if you think moto g's and e's are selling in BIG quantities you a wrong)
  • Alexvrb - Tuesday, November 25, 2014 - link

    Doesn't sound like you've really used one. :/ Don't get me wrong, I do game and I wouldn't buy one as a result. But you specifically said "I'm not talking about intensive 3D games". So, taking those out of the equation... even with the "slow" CPU, it does everything you're talking about just fine. They really run great, and the OS has superb SD card support - which negates the only major drawback I could hurl at this phone, the lack of storage.

    But again, since I do game occasionally on my phone, I would want a flagship. The Icon and M8 are both very nice models. However even those are going to need replacement in the not-so-distant future, and I hope Verizon stops being a Big Red Baby and works hand in hand with MS on future phone releases and updates alike.
  • close - Wednesday, November 26, 2014 - link

    Actually I did get the chance to test drive one of these (I do some hardware compliance so I get to test drive most relevant devices on the market, at least to get a rough idea about them). The OS itself is more than snappy on this CPU. But try to use it as any normal person would use a smartphone and it starts to choke. Loading applications or switching between application takes a long time. It's just not the experience I was expecting. Don't get me wrong, the device doesn't become unusable. It's just that at this price point at given the 8xx series position in MS's product lineup I have some higher expectations when using the phone.

    MS was careful to create an OS that runs great on low-end hardware but this isn't the case for software makers. And your smartphone is defined by the applications it runs and how it runs them.
    Bottom line, it's a nice phone but given the competition it's too expensive for its worth.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now