WiFi Performance

While the Galaxy S5 LTE-A Broadband had a Qualcomm Atheros solution (QCA6174), the Note 4 moves back to Broadcom's WiFi solution. In this case, we see the BCM4358, which is a revision of the BCM4354 that was first seen with Samsung's Galaxy S5. This shouldn't have any major differences outside of improved Bluetooth coexistence but antenna design can and does change between revisions. In order to test this, we use iperf and Asus' RT-AC68U router to try and achieve maximum performance.

WiFi Performance - UDP

As one can see, the Galaxy Note 4 has a strong showing in this test, easily surpassing every other device we have available for testing.

GNSS

At this point, it really goes without saying that the GNSS solution of choice is the one built into Qualcomm's modem. This allows for fixes based upon initial location and time data that the modem has, and therefore in practice every GPS fix is a hot fix and takes around 5 seconds for a lock in good conditions. In the case of the Note 4, with airplane mode on and no assistance data I saw that it took around 50 seconds to achieve a lock, but this is strongly dependent upon environmental conditions. Once locked, I found that the Note 4 had quite a strong lock and quickly went down to 10 foot accuracy level without issue.

Misc

Similar to the new Moto X we see a Cypress CapSense solution in the Note 4 but this is likely used for the capacitive buttons rather than any impedance-matching antenna tuner. The UV sensor appears to be a Maxim design win, although there's no information on the specific part. The battery's fuel gauge is also a Maxim part, as is the speaker amplifier and pulse sensor. The NFC chip used is NXP's PN547, so host card emulation should be supported and therefore Google Wallet's tap and pay system should work as well.

GPU and NAND Performance Final Words
Comments Locked

195 Comments

View All Comments

  • KPOM - Wednesday, October 15, 2014 - link

    To be fair, the iPhone 6 also charges faster if you use the iPad charger. AT's tests were using whatever charger they put into the box.
  • MattL - Thursday, October 16, 2014 - link

    ... and the Note 4 comes with a higher volt charger, that's one of the advertised benefits.
  • Mumrik - Wednesday, October 15, 2014 - link

    Why all the comparisons to iPhones?

    I suspect that decision is made long before people arrive at a review like this. Competing Android handsets are what is relevant here.
  • KPOM - Thursday, October 16, 2014 - link

    Not necessarily.
  • tralalalalalala40 - Saturday, October 18, 2014 - link

    they plot the data they have
  • Jcm800 - Wednesday, October 15, 2014 - link

    Err what happened to the comments about the external speaker audio /quality? Did I miss that or something? Great review apart from that.
  • Native7i - Wednesday, October 15, 2014 - link

    I was here to read some real deep review.
  • wantthefun - Thursday, October 16, 2014 - link

    Do you think the battery benchmark is biased to LCDs, since the AMOLEDs may perform much better on videos. I think the battery tables would switch around if the tests changed...
  • MattL - Thursday, October 16, 2014 - link

    Agreed... why aren't there more mixed content battery drain tests? Most sites will at least run web browsing + video drain... and some of the more interesting ones will try to run a combined test to show mixed use (probably more like normal use).
  • tralalalalalala40 - Saturday, October 18, 2014 - link

    when the scientific results don't agree with your bias find a test where it will.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now